Muzio v. Krauzer
| Decision Date | 07 February 1973 |
| Citation | 62 N.J. 243,300 A.2d 150 |
| Parties | Mary MUZIO and Angelo Muzio, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. George KRAUZER et al., Defendants-Respondents. |
| Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Andrew M. Rockman, Perth Amboy, for plaintiffs-appellants (Levinson, Conover, Fink & Axelrod, Perth Amboy, attorneys).
Herbert C. Klein, Passaic, for defendants-respondents (Krieger & Klein, Passaic, attorneys).
The judgment of the Appellate Division, 122 N.J.Super. 221, 300 A.2d 152 is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in its per curiam opinion.
For affirmance: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, Justice HALL, and Judges CONFORD and SULLIVAN--4.
For reversal: Justices JACOBS and NOUNTAIN--2.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Yanhko v. Fane
...affirming by an equal division of the court the decision in 121 N.J.Super. 453, 297 A.2d 856 (App.Div.1971); and Muzio v. Krauzer, 62 N.J. 243, 300 A.2d 150 (1973), affirming on the opinion below, 122 N.J.Super. 221, 300 A.2d 152 (App.Div.1971); 'An abutting owner is not liable for injuries......
-
Mirza v. Filmore Corp.
...576, 297 A.2d 1; in 1973 the Court divided four-to-two in favor of continuing the principle, Muzio v. Krauzer, 62 N.J. 243, 300 A.2d 150 (1973) (Justice Jacobs and Justice Mountain dissenting); and in 1976 the rule was upheld by a vote of five-to-two, Yanhko v. Fane, 70 N.J. 528, 362 A.2d 1......
-
Cogliati v. Ecco High Frequency Corp.
...was equally divided in affirming the Appellate Division's application of the nonliability rule. A year after that, in Muzio v. Krauzer, 62 N.J. 243, 300 A.2d 150 (1973), the court's split was four to two. And in Yanhko itself, Justice Pashman, the author of the Stewart majority opinion, not......
-
Liptak v. Frank
...Yanhko v. Fane, 70 N.J. 528, 537, 362 A.2d 1 (1976) (Justices Pashman and Schreiber, dissenting); Muzio v. Krauzer, 62 N.J. 243, 300 A.2d 150 (1973) (Justices Jacobs and Mountain, dissenting); Barkley v. Foster Estates, Inc., 61 N.J. 576, 297 A.2d 1 (1972) (affirming the Appellate Division ......
Request a trial to view additional results