Myers v. Commonwealth

Decision Date04 November 1875
PartiesMyers and Murray <I>versus</I> Commonwealth.
CourtPennsylvania Supreme Court

Before AGNEW, C. J., SHARSWOOD, WILLIAMS, MERCUR, GORDON, PAXSON and WOODWARD, JJ.

Writs of error to the Court of Oyer and Terminer of the County of Allegheny: Of October and November Term 1875. No. 128 and 129.

COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED

W. D. Moore, for Murray, and W. C. Moreland, for Myers, plaintiffs in error.

E. A. Montooth, District Attorney, and T. M. Bayne, for Commonwealth, defendant in error.

Mr. Justice GORDON delivered the opinion of the court, November 4th 1875.

The argument, for the plaintiff in error, rests on the assumption that the assistant and associate judges of the Court of Common Pleas, learned in the law, in the county of Allegheny, had, before the adoption of the New Constitution, no power to hold Courts of Oyer and Terminer for the trial of homicide cases, in the absence of the president judge. This, however, is unfounded, as will be seen upon referring to the Acts of 26th March 1859, Pamph. L. 253, and 11th of April 1862, Pamph. L. 448, creating the offices of assistant and associate judges for this county, and the Act of 4th of May 1865, Pamph. L. 842, conferring certain powers upon them. Under the last act any two of the judges may sit in the Oyer and Terminer Court for the trial of homicide cases. Sects. 8 and 9 of the 5th Art. of the New Constitution in question, with the Act of 27th of February 1875, confer full power upon the several judges of the Courts of Common Pleas, Nos. 1 and 2, in Allegheny county, to hold Courts of Oyer and Terminer for the trial of cases. The cases of The Commonwealth v. Zephon, 8 W. & S. 382; Kilpatrick v. Commonwealth, 7 Casey 198; and In re Application of Judges of the Eighth and Tenth Districts, 14 P. F. Smith 33, vindicate fully the legislation enabling associate judges learned in the law to hold Courts of Oyer and Terminer for the trial of homicide cases in the absence of the president judge.

The amendment of the indictment from "October" 1874 to "November" 1874, is justified by the 13th sect. of the Act of 31st of March 1860, relating to the criminal procedure, especially when read in connection with the powers of amendment set forth in the 11th and 12th sects. A clause in the 13th sect. reads thus: "Or in the name or description of any matter or thing whatsoever therein named or described." The month of October was named in the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
15 cases
  • Commonwealth v. Wiswesser
    • United States
    • Superior Court of Pennsylvania
    • 17 Diciembre 1936
    ...in sections 11, 12, and 13 (19 P.S. §§ 261, 431-433), makes liberal provision for the amendment of indictments. In Myers et al. v. Com., 79 Pa. 308, after the jury had been sworn, the court ordered the time laid in the indictment, wherever it occurred, to be changed from October 11, 1874, t......
  • Bachman v. McMichael
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
    • 7 Noviembre 1913
    ...Green, 58 Pa. 226; Morgan v. Reel, 213 Pa. 81; Commonwealth v. Hipple, 69 Pa. 9; Commonwealth v. Bell, 4 Pa. Superior Ct. 187; Myers v. Commonwealth, 79 Pa. 308. Simpson, Jr., for defendants. -- There is nothing in Section 6, of the Constitution, in antagonism, or suggested antagonism to Se......
  • Welty v. Ward
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Indiana
    • 30 Marzo 1905
    ...Y. 213, 10 N. E. 690;Rosenberger v. Com., 118 Pa. 77, 84, 11 Atl. 782;Rough v. Com., 78 Pa. 495; Myers v. Com., 79 Pa. 311; Murray v. Com., 79 Pa. 308;People v. Waller, 70 Mich. 237, 38 N. W. 261;People v. Brown, 110 Mich. 168, 67 N. W. 1112;Shiflett v. Com., 90 Va. 386, 18 S. E. 838;State ......
  • State v. Mullen
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • 6 Junio 1911
    ...State v. Hanks, 39 La. Ann. 234, 1 South. 458;State v. Casavant, 64 Vt. 405, 23 Atl. 636;Baker v. State, 88 Wis. 140, 59 N. W. 570;Myers v. Com., 79 Pa. 308;Rosenberger v. Com., 118 Pa. 77, 11 Atl. 782. [4] 3. One of the alleged false representations was that the stock was worth $100 per sh......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT