Myers v. Davis
| Decision Date | 04 December 1978 |
| Docket Number | No. CIV-4-78-24.,CIV-4-78-24. |
| Citation | 467 F. Supp. 8 |
| Parties | Jimmy W. MYERS, Plaintiff, v. Larry B. DAVIS et al., etc., Defendants. |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Tennessee |
Jerre M. Hood, and Robert S. Peters, Winchester, Tenn., for plaintiff.
Joe R. Hickerson, and Ben P. Lynch, Winchester, Tenn., for defendants.
This is a civil action for money damages for the deprivation of the plaintiff's civil rights, 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3). The complaint alleges that, on an isolated occasion, the two individual defendants, as police officers for the city of Cowan, Tennessee and acting under color of Tennessee law, ud an excessive and unreasonable amount of force upon him. The plaintiff contends that the defendant municipality "* * * is liable for the said acts of the officers by virtue of Tennessee Code Annotated § 6-640,1 upon which statute the plaintiff relies as the basis of the cause of action against the defendant, City of Cowan. * * *" This amounts to an attempt to hold the defendant municipality liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior. This cannot be done. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Soc. Serv. (1978), 436 U.S. 658, 691, 98 S.Ct. 2018, 2036, 56 L.Ed.2d 611, 6367; Jones v. City of Memphis, C.A. 6th (1978), 586 F.2d 622, 623.
Accordingly, as to the defendant the City of Cowan, Tennessee, this action hereby is DISMISSED sua sponte2 for the failure of the plaintiff to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
1 "* * * Whenever * * * any employee member of a * * * police department of a municipal corporation * * * shall be sued for damages arising out of the performance of his official duties and while engaged in the course of his employment by such governmental agency, such governmental agency shall be authorized and required * * * to indemnify him from any judgment rendered against him in such suit; provided, however, that such indemnity shall not extend to any judgment for punitive damages or for damages arising out of any willful wrongdoing by said employee and; provided, further, that such municipal corporation * * * shall have notice of such suit. * * *"
2 "* * * Even if a party does not make a formal motion, the court on its own initiative may note the inadequacy of the complaint and dismiss it for failure to state a claim. * * *" 5 Wright & Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure: Civil 593, § 1357.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Metadure Corp. v. United States
...addressed Hassine's fourth cause of action, this court has authority to consider facial deficiencies in that claim. See Myers v. Davis, 467 F.Supp. 8 (E.D.Tenn.1978); 2a Moore's Federal Practice ¶ 12.14 at 2335 (2 ed. ...
-
Hill v. United States, Civ. A. No. 3:84-0722.
...hereby is DISMISSED sua sponte for the failure of the plaintiff to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. Myers v. Davis, 467 F.Supp. 8, 9, n. 22 (D.C.Tenn.1978). 2 Mrs. Hill is not a party to this 3 Specifically, Mr. and Mrs. Hill sought to reduce their taxable-income from $18,6......
-
Jenkins v. Carruth
...relief could be granted him herein. Accordingly, his claim herein hereby is DISMISSED sua sponte for such reason. Myers v. Davis, D.C.Tenn. (1978), 467 F.Supp. 8, 92, n. 2. The plaintiffs' exception no. 1 to the pretrial order hereby is ALLOWED; their exceptions nos. 2, 3 and 4 hereby are D......
-
Beckelhimer v. United States
...sua sponte for the failure of the plaintiffs to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 26 U.S.C. § 7422(f); Myers v. Davis, 467 F.Supp. 8, 9 n. 22 (D.C.Tenn.1978). 2 "Unless expressly prohibited by statute, a court may award reasonable fees and expenses of attorneys, in addition to......