Myers v. Lovetinsky, No. 54501

• Court: United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
• Writing for the Court: UHLENHOPP; All Justices concur except REYNOLDSON
• Citation: 189 N.W.2d 571
• Parties: Lloyd MYERS and Norma Myers, Appellees, v. George LOVETINSKY and Mildred Lovetinsky, Appellees, and T. H. Laundre, et al., Appellants. T. H. LAUNDRE & ASSOCIATES, INC. and McAlester Fuel Company, Appellants, v. Lloyd M. MYERS and Norma Myers, Appellees.
• Docket Number: No. 54501
• Decision Date: 09 September 1971

Page 571

189 N.W.2d 571 Lloyd MYERS and Norma Myers, Appellees,
v.
George LOVETINSKY and Mildred Lovetinsky, Appellees,
and T. H. Laundre, et al., Appellants.
T. H. LAUNDRE & ASSOCIATES, INC. and McAlester Fuel Company, Appellants,
v.
Lloyd M. MYERS and Norma Myers, Appellees. No. 54501. Supreme Court of Iowa. Sept. 9, 1971.

Page 572

William L. Meardon, Iowa City, for appellants.

Page 573

Cahill, Lovelace, Poula & Wimpey, Iowa City, for appellees Myers.

Ralph L. Neuzil, Iowa City, for appellees Lovetinskys.

UHLENHOPP, Justice.

This appeal involves the preferential right of a tenant to purchase demised premises when a landlord sells to a third person a larger tract of which the demised premises are a part. The subject is treated in 51C C.J.S. Landlord and Tenant § 88(7) at 273--274, in 49 Am.Jur.2d Landlord & Tenant § 371 at 388--89, and in Annot., 170 A.L.R. 1068.

We will refer to the larger tract including the leased portion as the farm and to the leased portion alone as the demised premises, to the individuals who owned the farm and granted the demise as the landlords, to the lessees of the demised premises as the tenants, and to the buyers of the farm from the landlords as the purchasers. (The purchasers subsequently conveyed the farm to a corporation, which stands in their shoes.)

The landlords owned a farm of about 94 acres on the north side of United States Highway 6 near Iowa City, Iowa. Approximately 475 feet of the farm adjoin Highway 6 and constitute valuable commercial property. The rest of the farm, extending north, is less valuable.

On September 19, 1961, the landlords leased an unimproved half-acre of the farm to the tenants for five years commencing March 1, 1961, for a miniature golf course and a dairy store. The tenants had previously been in possession of the half-acre, which has approximately 95 feet of frontage on Highway 6. The lease permitted the tenants to remove their improvements at the expiration of the term, though affixed to the land. The lease also contained this clause granting the tenants a preferential right to purchase the demised premises:

It is further agreed, that if, during the term of this lease, Lessor should desire to sell the leased premises, then the lessee shall have the privilege of purchasing at the same price for which the Lessor would be willing to sell to any other person; but if the Lessee should not exercise within 10 days after notice in writing from the Lessor of such desire to sell, then this privilege shall be null and void and of no effect. It is further agreed that the privilege contained in this paragraph is a personal privilege and shall not be a covenant remaining with the land.

The lease granted the tenants a right to extend the term under certain circumstances, but those circumstances did not arise and the right to extent need not be considered.

The tenants occupied the demised premises under the lease, made improvements, and paid the rent.

On December 26, 1963, the landlords granted the purchasers an option to buy the entire farm for $1,750 per acre, on a contract calling for installment payments running to 1969. The option was expressly subject to the tenants' lease and contained this clause:

The Sellers herein (landlords), upon the receipt of the said Notice to exercise the Option (by purchasers), shall thereupon give to the Lessees, Lloyd L. Myers and Norma Myers (tenants), the right of first refusal to purchase said tract of land covered by the certain Lease that was entered into on the 19th day of September, 1961, for the total purchase price of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00). Said notice shall be given in writing, all as provided for in that certain Lease Agreement hereinbefore referred to.

In the event that Lloyd L. Myers and Norma Myers elect to exercise their right of first refusal by paying the sum

Page 574

of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00) for the tract hereinbefore described, then in that event the total purchase price to be paid by the buyers shall be reduced by the sum of twenty thousand dollars ($20,000.00).

The option also provided that under certain conditions prior to final payment under the contract, the purchasers could obtain a deed to portions of the farm within 500 feet of Highway 6 by paying the landlords amounts in the same proportion of $20,000 as the portions so obtained bore in size to the demised premises.

On March 27, 1964, the purchasers exercised the option to buy the farm.

About March 31, 1964, the landlords gave the tenants notice in writing that the purchasers had 'offered to purchase said described (demised) premises for the sum of $20,000.00 payable in cash' and that 'you may purchase the same for the said amount of $20,000.00 on the same terms and conditions providing you will notify the undersigned within ten days from the receipt of this notice of your desire to purchase the same'. Actually, the purchasers did not offer to buy the demised premises for $20,000, nor did they offer to pay cash. They bought the whole farm for $1,750 per acre, and they purchased on contract.

On April 2, 1964, the tenants notified the landlords in writing of the exercise of their preferential right to buy the demised premises 'strictly in accordance with the terms * * * in said lease.' The notice also recited, 'This is not to be taken as a notice of an agreement on the part of the undersigned to pay the sum of $20,000 for said tract for the reason that the same is not in accordance with the terms and conditions of * * * the written lease above referred to.'

Nothing further occurred at that time with respect to the tenants' buying the demised premises.

On April 26, 1965, the landlords and the purchasers entered into an agreement that the purchasers would pay the full balance of the price of the farm and the landlords would deliver the deed, which was done. Those parties also agreed that the landlords would retain possession until December 1, 1966, and the purchasers would sell the demised premises to the tenants on demand by them for not more than $20,000 in accordance with the lease. Laundre, one of the purchasers, also agreed to hold the landlords harmless from any claims by the tenants.

The tenants paid the rent in full to February 28, 1966, but none thereafter. They remained in possession of the demised premises and are still in possession.

The parties were unable to resolve their controversy, and the present litigation was instituted on August 3, 1967, for a declaration of rights. The purchasers also asked for reasonable rent for the demised premises forward from March 1, 1966, and for...