Myers v. Manchester Ins. & Indem. Co.

Citation572 F.2d 134
Decision Date26 April 1978
Docket NumberNo. 75-1346,75-1346
PartiesMrs. Marlin MYERS, Individually and for use and benefit of her minor daughter, Robin Myers, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MANCHESTER INSURANCE & INDEMNITY COMPANY and Playland Amusements, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit)

George Mathews, Baton Rouge, La., for defendants-appellants.

Edward J. Norton, Jr., New Orleans, La., for plaintiff-appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana.

Before MORGAN and GEE, Circuit Judges, and KING, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

In this diversity action, sounding in tort, appellant contends that appellee was without legal capacity to sue, as provided by F.R.C.P. Rule 17(b), that the evidence did not support the finding of liability, and that the award was excessive. We disagree with appellant and affirm. As held below, at the pre-trial conference, the parties stipulated that capacity existed in the appellee. Additionally, appellant failed to object to lack of capacity until the post-trial conference. Under these circumstances we hold that appellant waived its challenge to the appellee's capacity. Cf. Pace v. General Electric Co., 55 F.R.D. 215 (D.C.Pa.1972). (Court permitted waiver of Rule 17(a) objection to real party in interest unless jurisdiction was impaired.) Additionally, we are convinced the proper tort law was applied and that the determination of negligence was not clearly erroneous. F.R.C.P. Rule 52(a), 28 U.S.C.A. Finally, we are not persuaded that the amount of the award was so excessive as to be unreasonable. Machado v. States-Isthmian Agency, Inc., 411 F.2d 584, 586 (5th Cir. 1969). We therefore

AFFIRM.

* United States District Judge for the Southern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Morice v. Hosp. Serv. Dist. #3
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • December 27, 2019
  • U.S. ex rel. Garibaldi v. Orleans Par. School Bd., CIV. A. 96-0464.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • April 27, 1999
    ... ... admissions conclusively binding on the party who made them), citing Myers v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity Co., 572 F.2d 134 (5th Cir.1978) ... ...
  • Roth v. Islamic Republic of Iran
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Columbia
    • January 27, 2015
  • Loose v. Offshore Navigation, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • March 4, 1982
    ...(Emphasis supplied.) Such an admission is usually a waiver of the assertion of a contrary position, see Myers v. Manchester Ins. & Indemnity Co., 572 F.2d 134 (5th Cir. 1978); Mull v. Ford Motor Co., 368 F.2d 713, 716 (2d Cir. 1966). Midnight Boat did not raise the stipulation in the court ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT