Myers v. Scott County, s. 88-5018
| Decision Date | 03 March 1989 |
| Docket Number | Nos. 88-5018,s. 88-5018 |
| Citation | 868 F.2d 1017 |
| Parties | Greg MYERS and Jane Myers, individually and as parents and natural guardians of Andy Myers, Amy Myers and Brian Myers, minors, Appellants, v. SCOTT COUNTY; R. Kathleen Morris, Scott County Attorney; Scott County Human Services; Peg Subby, its Director of Human Services; Thomas Price; Phipps-Yonas & Price, P.A.; Doris Wilker, Social Worker; other Employees of Scott County Human Services whose names and titles are unknown; Douglas Tietz, Scott County Sheriff; Deputy Sheriffs Norman Pint, Patrick Morgan and Michael Busch; City Council of Jordan, Minnesota; and Alvin Erickson, Jordan Chief of Police, Appellees. Donald BUCHAN and Cindy Buchan, individually and as parents and natural guardians of Courtney B. Buchan, Melissa Ellen Buchan and William Donald Buchan, minors, Appellants, v. SCOTT COUNTY; Kathleen R. Morris, Scott County Attorney; Scott County Human Services; Peg Subby, its Director of Human Services; Doris Wilker, Social Worker; Mary Tafs, Social Worker; Judy Dean, Social Worker; Susan Devreis, Psychologist; other employees of Scott County Human Services whose names and titles are unknown; and Douglas Tietz, Sheriff of Scott County, Appellees. Daniel J. MEGER and Wanda Lou Meger, individually and as parents and natural guardians of Brian and Chad Meger, minors, Appellants, v. SCOTT COUNTY; Kathleen Morris; Scott County Welfare Department; Margaret Subby; Scott County Sheriff's Department and its deputies, Patrick Morgan, Michael Busch; Doris Wilker; John Doe and Mary Doe and other employees of Scott County whose names and titles are unknown, Appellees. John JOE and Jane Joe, individually and as the parents and guardians of Tom Joe, Jim Joe and Linda Joe, their minor children, Appellants, v. SCOTT COUNTY; Scott County Attorney's Office; R. Kathleen Morris; Scott County Sheriff's Office; David Einertson, individually and in his official capacity; Michael Busch, individually and in his official capacity; Norman Pint, individually and in his official capacity; Sco |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
To continue reading
Request your trial
67 cases
-
Callahan v. Lancaster-Lebanon Intermediate Unit 13
...were constitutionally inadequate. In Re Scott County Master Docket, 672 F.Supp. 1152, 1169 (D.Minn.1987), aff'd, Myers v. Scott County, 868 F.2d 1017 (8th Cir.1989). Procedural due process, then, is unlike substantive due process in that the constitutional violation "is not complete unless ......
-
Petcu v. State
...that she would be violating Petcu's constitutional rights by deviating from those procedures. We disagree. See Myers v. Scott County, 868 F.2d 1017, 1018 (8th Cir.1989) (deviations from proper investigative procedure while investigating allegations of child sexual abuse do not rise to the l......
-
Greiner v. City of Champlin
...analysis is necessary. In re Scott County Master Docket, 672 F.Supp. 1152, 1181 (D.Minn.1987), aff'd sub nom., Myers v. Scott County, 868 F.2d 1017 (8th Cir.1989). "The first task is to identify what the governmental body's policy is. The second task is to determine whether that policy is u......
-
Lawrence v. City of St. Paul
...Willner. "[T]he theory of substantive due process is properly reserved for truly egregious and extraordinary cases." Myers v. Scott Cnty., 868 F.2d 1017, 1018 (8th Cir.1989). To recover for a deprivation of substantive due process, a "plaintiff 'must demonstrate both that the official's con......
Request a trial to view additional results