Myers v. State, 867S60

Decision Date25 February 1969
Docket NumberNo. 867S60,867S60
Citation251 Ind. 126,244 N.E.2d 649
PartiesLarry Wayne MYERS, Appellant, v. STATE of Indiana, Appellee.
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
Howard S. Grimm, Jr., Edgar A. Grimm, Kendallville, for appellant.

DeBRULER, Chief Justice.

The only issue in appellant's petition for rehearing that was not considered and decided in the original opinion is whether appellant has a right to oral argument before this Court. This Court refused appellant's petition for oral argument. In Robbins v. State (1969), Ind., 242 N.E.2d 925, Judge Hunter, speaking for a unanimous Court said:

'While it is true that, when an appeal is afforded to an accused, certain essentials attach to the appellate procedure, it has never been required that one such essential be oral argument. It has been the experience of this court that oral argument has proved helpful or decisive only when the issues were too complex to be adequately covered in a written brief. In the instant case we feel the briefs adequately and completely articulate the issues involved in this appeal.'

On the authority of that case we deny rehearing.

ARTERBURN, HUNTER and JACKSON, JJ. concur.

GIVAN, J., not participating.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • White v. State, 2--673A142
    • United States
    • Indiana Appellate Court
    • September 26, 1974
    ...element of the crime. Buckner v. State (1969), 252 Ind. 379, 248 N.E.2d 348; Myers v. State (1968), 251 Ind. 126, 239 N.E.2d 605, 244 N.E.2d 649; Heglin v. State (1957), 236 Ind. 350, 140 N.E.2d The necessity of proof is no less essential for drug-related offenses than for other offenses. T......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT