Mylroie v. GAF Corp.
| Decision Date | 09 February 1982 |
| Citation | 449 N.Y.S.2d 21,433 N.E.2d 1269,55 N.Y.2d 893 |
| Parties | , 433 N.E.2d 1269 Sarah V. MYLROIE, Appellant, v. GAF CORPORATION, Respondent. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Henry Neal Conolly, Albany, for appellant.
George F. Carpinello, Albany, for respondent.
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, 81 A.D.2d 994, 440 N.Y.S.2d 67, without costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division.
We would only add that by accepting an award of workers' compensation benefits, plaintiff forfeited the right to maintain an action at law on the theory of intentional tort. (Werner v. State of New York, 53 N.Y.2d 346, 441 N.Y.S.2d 654, 424 N.E.2d 541.)
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum.
To continue reading
Request your trial
20 cases
-
Orzechowski v. Warner-Lambert Co., WARNER-LAMBERT
...at causing harm to [that] particular employee " (Mylroie v. GAF Corp., 81 A.D.2d 994, 995, 440 N.Y.S.2d 67, affd. 55 N.Y.2d 893, 449 N.Y.S.2d 21, 433 N.E.2d 1269, emphasis supplied). Accordingly, covered employees have consistently been permitted to maintain common law causes of actions for......
-
Gagliardi v. Trapp
...Oberman, 117 A.D.2d 724, 725, 498 N.Y.S.2d 449, quoting Mylroie v. GAF Corp., 81 A.D.2d 994, 995, 440 N.Y.S.2d 67, aff'd 55 N.Y.2d 893, 449 N.Y.S.2d 21, 433 N.E.2d 1269; see also, Orzechowski v. Warner-Lambert Co., 92 A.D.2d 110, 460 N.Y.S.2d 64). Allegations that the employer exposed the e......
-
Mera v. Adelphi Mfg. Co., Inc.
...at causing harm to [that] particular employee ' (Mylorie v. GAF Corp., 81 A.D.2d 994, 995, 440 N.Y.S.2d 67, affd. 55 N.Y.2d 893, 449 N.Y.S.2d 21, 433 N.E.2d 1269; emphasis supplied)" (Orzechowski v. Warner-Lambert Co., 92 A.D.2d 110, 112, 460 N.Y.S.2d 64), the allegations contained in the c......
-
Ferrara v. American ACMI
...to the exclusivity of the workers' compensation remedy (see, Mylroie v. GAF Corp., 81 A.D.2d 994, 440 N.Y.S.2d 67, affd. 55 N.Y.2d 893, 449 N.Y.S.2d 21, 433 N.E.2d 1269; Bardere v. Zafir, 102 A.D.2d 422, 424, 477 N.Y.S.2d 131, affd. 63 N.Y.2d 850, 482 N.Y.S.2d 261, 472 N.E.2d 37; Orzechowsk......
Request a trial to view additional results