Myron v. New York

Decision Date02 April 2007
Docket NumberNo. 06-9216.,06-9216.
Citation75 USLW 3530,127 S.Ct. 1919,167 L.Ed.2d 572,549 U.S. 1326
PartiesJames M. MYRON, petitioner, v. NEW YORK.
CourtU.S. Supreme Court
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Case below, 28 A.D.3d 681, 814 N.Y.S.2d 198.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department, denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • People v. Seymour
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • October 26, 2010
    ...see People v. Diaz, 50 A.D.3d 919, 855 N.Y.S.2d 647; People v. Myron, 28 A.D.3d 681, 814 N.Y.S.2d 198, cert. denied 549 U.S. 1326, 127 S.Ct. 1919, 167 L.Ed.2d 572; People v. Telesford, 2 A.D.3d 757, 758, 770 N.Y.S.2d 118; People v. Fulford, 280 A.D.2d 682, 721 N.Y.S.2d 109). Moreover, the p......
  • People v. Rodriguez
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 4, 2010
    ...634 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Penal Law § 60.27[2]; People v. Myron, 28 A.D.3d 681, 684, 814 N.Y.S.2d 198, cert. denied 549 U.S. 1326, 127 S.Ct. 1919, 167 L.Ed.2d 572; People v. Vella, 176 A.D.2d at 768-769, 574 N.Y.S.2d 825). Accordingly, the matter must be remitted to the Su......
  • People v. Sharpe
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 27, 2011
    ...McLaurin, 33 A.D.3d 819, 819–820, 826 N.Y.S.2d 279; People v. Myron, 28 A.D.3d 681, 683, 814 N.Y.S.2d 198, cert. denied 549 U.S. 1326, 127 S.Ct. 1919, 167 L.Ed.2d 572; cf. People v. Hayes, 97 N.Y.2d 203, 207–208, 738 N.Y.S.2d 663, 764 N.E.2d 963). The defendant contends that the evidence wa......
  • People v. Rosado
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • March 19, 2014
    ...see People v. Thompson, 99 A.D.3d 819, 951 N.Y.S.2d 754;People v. Myron, 28 A.D.3d 681, 683, 814 N.Y.S.2d 198,cert. denied549 U.S. 1326, 127 S.Ct. 1919, 167 L.Ed.2d 572). Moreover, the fact that one of the convictions was remote does not, in and of itself, require preclusion of that convict......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT