N. Coal & Dock Co. v. Indus. Comm'n
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Wisconsin |
Writing for the Court | ROSENBERRY |
Citation | 213 N.W. 658,193 Wis. 515 |
Parties | NORTHERN COAL & DOCK CO. ET AL v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION ET AL. |
Decision Date | 03 May 1927 |
193 Wis. 515
213 N.W. 658
NORTHERN COAL & DOCK CO. ET AL
v.
INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION ET AL.
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
May 3, 1927.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Dane County; August C. Hoppmann, Judge.
Action by the Northern Coal & Dock Company and others to review an award by the Industrial Commission to Emma Strand for the death of her husband. From a judgment affirming the award, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.--[By Editorial Staff.]
Workmen's compensation liability and maritime law. The Northern Coal & Dock Company having its principal office at Cleveland, Ohio, is engaged in mining, distributing, and selling coal at wholesale. It does not own or operate any vessels or railroad lines. It has a dock situated on Superior Bay, a navigable portion of the Duluth Superior Harbor. Boats from Lake Erie ports discharge their cargoes at this dock. In October, 1924, the deceased, Charles Strand, was in the employ of the company as a car loader, but at times in the discharge of his duties he was required to assist in the unloading of boats. He was regularly employed by the dock company. They, however, had no employees who worked exclusively at unloading boats. The regular employees on the dock were called upon at such times as boats were being unloaded to go into the boats and help to unload the coal. The company had an average of about five boats per month during the season of navigation, and it took about 15 1/2 hours to unload a boat of average size. The employees were engaged approximately 75 hours in each month in unloading boats at the dock, and during the remainder of the time were given other work. During the year 1924, the deceased had worked 117 1/2 hours on the 31 boats. On October 20, 1924, the deceased, Strand, was working in the hold of the steamer Matthew Andrews, which was then lying at the dock, cleaning up coal in the hatches and shoveling it out so that the clamshell could pick it up. While so engaged he was caught between the clamshell and the side of the boat and died almost instantly as a result of his injuries. The vessel in which he was working at the time of his death was the steamer Matthew Andrews, which had brought a cargo of coal from Toledo, Ohio, to Superior by way of the Great Lakes. The vessel was lying in navigable waters and was made fast to the dock by lines in the customary way of securing boats while they are being unloaded. The clamshell was a part of the dock equipment and was operated by the dock company.
Strand's earnings were in excess of $1,400 per annum, and the funeral expenses amounted to more than $200. Upon proceedings had before the Industrial Commission the widow, Emma Strand, was awarded compensation. An action was begun in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Northern Coal Dock Co v. Strand, No. 41
...brought an action in the Dane county circuit court. That court sustained the award and the state Supreme Court approved its action. (193 Wis. 515, 213 N. W. 658, 215 N. W. 448.) Strand's employment contemplated that he should labor both upon the land and the water. When killed, he was doing......
-
N. Coal & Dock Co. v. Strand
...448NORTHERN COAL & DOCK CO. ET AL.v.STRAND ET AL.Supreme Court of Wisconsin.Oct. 11, 1927. Concurring opinion. For main opinion, see 213 N. W. 658.*448STEVENS, J. (concurring). The widow of the deceased employee makes no claim against the ship on which decedent was injured nor against t......
-
Gruhl Realty Co. v. Groth (In re Cemetery)
...referred to. [213 N.W. 657]Otjen & Otjen, of Milwaukee, for appellant.Schanen & Huiras, of Port Washington, for respondents. [213 N.W. 658]CROWNHART, J. The proceedings herein were instituted under chapter 157 of the Statutes relating to cemeteries. Section 157.05, so far as materia......
-
N. Coal & Dock Co. v. Indus. Comm'n of Wis.
...this court. On May 3, 1927, the opinion of this court was rendered affirming the award of the Industrial Commission, 193 Wis. 515, 517, 213 N. W. 658, 215 N. W. 448. The case was then taken to the Supreme Court of the United States on writ of error and by that court reversed, with costs, on......
-
Northern Coal Dock Co v. Strand, No. 41
...brought an action in the Dane county circuit court. That court sustained the award and the state Supreme Court approved its action. (193 Wis. 515, 213 N. W. 658, 215 N. W. 448.) Strand's employment contemplated that he should labor both upon the land and the water. When killed, he was doing......
-
N. Coal & Dock Co. v. Strand
...448NORTHERN COAL & DOCK CO. ET AL.v.STRAND ET AL.Supreme Court of Wisconsin.Oct. 11, 1927. Concurring opinion. For main opinion, see 213 N. W. 658.*448STEVENS, J. (concurring). The widow of the deceased employee makes no claim against the ship on which decedent was injured nor against t......
-
Gruhl Realty Co. v. Groth (In re Cemetery)
...referred to. [213 N.W. 657]Otjen & Otjen, of Milwaukee, for appellant.Schanen & Huiras, of Port Washington, for respondents. [213 N.W. 658]CROWNHART, J. The proceedings herein were instituted under chapter 157 of the Statutes relating to cemeteries. Section 157.05, so far as materia......
-
N. Coal & Dock Co. v. Indus. Comm'n of Wis.
...this court. On May 3, 1927, the opinion of this court was rendered affirming the award of the Industrial Commission, 193 Wis. 515, 517, 213 N. W. 658, 215 N. W. 448. The case was then taken to the Supreme Court of the United States on writ of error and by that court reversed, with costs, on......