N.L.R.B. v. Highview, Inc., 77-3279
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (5th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE and THORNBERRY; PER CURIAM |
| Citation | 595 F.2d 339 |
| Parties | 101 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2504, 86 Lab.Cas. P 11,382 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. HIGHVIEW, INCORPORATED, Respondent. |
| Docket Number | No. 77-3279,77-3279 |
| Decision Date | 02 May 1979 |
Page 339
v.
HIGHVIEW, INCORPORATED, Respondent.
Fifth Circuit.
Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Walter Christian Schumann, Atty., Ruah D. Lahey, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Claud L. McIver, III, Charles Kelso, Michael C. Towers, Frederick R. Mann, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent.
Curtis L. Mack, Director, Region 10, N. L. R. B., Atlanta, Ga., for other interested party.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, TUTTLE and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
In our consideration of this case, N. L. R. B. v. Highview, Inc., 590 F.2d 174, 180-181
Page 340
(5 Cir. 1979), we denied in part the Board's application for enforcement because Fulton County "had made moves to dissolve Highview, Inc. and take over operation of the home as a direct county project." In its petition for rehearing the Board has informed us that the Fulton County Commissioners have now rescinded their resolution expressing their intent to take over operation of the home. Pursuant to Rule 40 F.R.A.P., we have asked for a response from Highview. Highview has informed us that the Board's petition is correct and the Fulton County Commissioners do not intend to take over operations of the home.Consequently, we vacate the part of our previous opinion denominated Section III. The Board's application for enforcement is now GRANTED in all respects.
Petition for Rehearing GRANTED; enforcement GRANTED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
13 cases
-
Enrique Molina-Estrada v. Puerto Rico Highway Authority, MOLINA-ESTRADA
...(6th Cir. 1979); health care of the aged and sick, NLRB v. Highview, Inc., 590 F.2d 174, 178, vacated in part on other grounds, 595 F.2d 339 (5th Cir. 1979); state licensing of automobile drivers, United States v. Best, 573 F.2d 1095, 1103 (9th Cir. 1978); the state legislature's adoption o......
-
Le v. Unum Ins. Co. of Am., CIVIL ACTION CASE NO. 17-833
...).71 Id.72 Id. at 15–16 (citing N.L.R.B. v. Highview, Inc. , 590 F.2d 174, 176 (5th Cir. 1979), vacated in part on other grounds , 595 F.2d 339 (5th Cir. 1979) ).73 Id. at 17 (citing 255 So.2d at 763 ).74 Id. at 18–19 (quoting 965 F.2d 542, 546 (7th Cir. 1992) ).75 Id. at 19.76 Id.77 Id. at......
-
Bonnette v. California Health & Welfare Agency
...defined a variety of "integral government functions." E. g., NLRB v. Highview, Inc., 590 F.2d 174 (5th Cir.), enforcement modified, 595 F.2d 339 (1979) (the care of the aged, sick and indigent); Amersbach v. City of Cleveland, 598 F.2d 1033 (6th Cir. 1979) (operation of a municipal airport)......
-
Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. Atlantic County Ass'n for Retarded Citizens, AFL-CI
...v. Austin Developmental Ctr., Inc., supra at 789; N.L.R.B. v. Highview, Inc., 590 F.2d 174, 177 (5 Cir.1979), mod. on other grounds 595 F.2d 339 (5 Cir.1979); Res Care Inc., When these principles are applied to the facts assumed to be true here, and in particular, given the rulings in the H......
Request a trial to view additional results