N.L.R.B. v. Sure-Tan, Inc., SURE-TA
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | Before CUMMINGS and WOOD, Circuit Judges, and VAN PELT; CUMMINGS; HARLINGTON WOOD, Jr. |
| Citation | 583 F.2d 355 |
| Parties | 99 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2388, 47 A.L.R.Fed. 899, 84 Lab.Cas. P 10,794 NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v.and Surak Leather Company, Respondent. . Heard |
| Docket Number | SURE-TA,No. 77-2020,INC |
| Decision Date | 05 April 1978 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 practice notes
-
v. National Labor Relations Board, SURE-TA
...bargaining units, see Duke City Lumber Co., 251 N.L.R.B. 53 (1980); Sure-Tan, Inc., and Surak Leather Co., 231 N.L.R.B. 138 (1977), enf'd, 583 F.2d 355 (CA7 1978), and has found violations of the Act both in their discriminatory discharge, see Apollo Tire Co., 236 N.L.R.B. 1627 (1978), enf'......
-
Mosey Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., No. 81-1668
...as a bargaining representative. This argument has no merit."). Nor is high employee turnover sufficient. See NLRB v. Sure-Tan, Inc., 583 F.2d 355, 361 (7th Cir.1978). In the present case the majority reverses the presumption, assuming that the passage of time and the possibility of turnover......
-
N.L.R.B. v. Sure-Tan, Inc., SURE-TA
..."bogeymen" who now have made a full appearance calling on us for decision in this matter of first impression. See NLRB v. Sure-Tan, Inc., 583 F.2d 355, 358 n.3 (7th Cir. 1978). In this prior decision involving the same respondent, we held that illegal aliens are "employees" protected by the......
-
HOTEL & REST. EMP. UNION, LOCAL 25 v. Smith, Civ. A. No. 82-2203.
...of their immigration status, fall under the definition of "employees" under the National Labor Relations Act. See NLRB v. Sure-Tan, Inc., 583 F.2d 355 (7th Cir.1978). The NLRA also specifically precludes unions from discriminating against any one group of employees. Bell & Howell Co. v. NLR......
Request a trial to view additional results
9 cases
-
v. National Labor Relations Board, SURE-TA
...bargaining units, see Duke City Lumber Co., 251 N.L.R.B. 53 (1980); Sure-Tan, Inc., and Surak Leather Co., 231 N.L.R.B. 138 (1977), enf'd, 583 F.2d 355 (CA7 1978), and has found violations of the Act both in their discriminatory discharge, see Apollo Tire Co., 236 N.L.R.B. 1627 (1978), enf'......
-
Mosey Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., No. 81-1668
...as a bargaining representative. This argument has no merit."). Nor is high employee turnover sufficient. See NLRB v. Sure-Tan, Inc., 583 F.2d 355, 361 (7th Cir.1978). In the present case the majority reverses the presumption, assuming that the passage of time and the possibility of turnover......
-
N.L.R.B. v. Sure-Tan, Inc., SURE-TA
..."bogeymen" who now have made a full appearance calling on us for decision in this matter of first impression. See NLRB v. Sure-Tan, Inc., 583 F.2d 355, 358 n.3 (7th Cir. 1978). In this prior decision involving the same respondent, we held that illegal aliens are "employees" protected by the......
-
HOTEL & REST. EMP. UNION, LOCAL 25 v. Smith, Civ. A. No. 82-2203.
...of their immigration status, fall under the definition of "employees" under the National Labor Relations Act. See NLRB v. Sure-Tan, Inc., 583 F.2d 355 (7th Cir.1978). The NLRA also specifically precludes unions from discriminating against any one group of employees. Bell & Howell Co. v. NLR......
Request a trial to view additional results