Nagle v. Cohn

Decision Date29 May 1907
Citation67 A. 419
PartiesNAGLE v. COHN.
CourtRhode Island Supreme Court

Exceptions from Superior Court, Providence County.

Action by Loretta Nagle, pro ami, against Jacob Cohn. Verdict for plaintiff. Defendant brings exceptions. Exceptions sustained, and case remitted, with directions.

Cooney & Cahill, for plaintiff. James A. Williams, for defendant

PER CURIAM. There was sufficient evidence to justify the jury in finding that the defendant assaulted the plaintiff; but, as the injuries inflicted were neither permanent nor grave, compensatory damages for the same could not be large, and the balance of the verdict necessarily must have been awarded as punitive damages. In our opinion the damages awarded are excessive, and for that reason a new trial will be granted unless the plaintiff, within 10 days hereafter, shall remit the sum of $250 of the verdict recovered by her against the defendant.

The case is therefore remitted to the superior court, with direction to enter judgment on the verdict for the sum of $350 in case of such remission, or for a new trial if the plaintiff shall not so remit.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT