Nailling v. United States, 8955.

Decision Date10 December 1941
Docket NumberNo. 8955.,8955.
Citation124 F.2d 431
PartiesNAILLING v. UNITED STATES.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

Dwyane D. Maddox, of Huntingdon, Tenn., for appellant.

Wm. McClanahan, U. S. Atty., of Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.

Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel; and it appearing that the only question presented relates to the sufficiency of the evidence, and that no motion was made for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence; and it appearing that this court will not consider the sufficiency of the evidence unless it is satisfied that there has been a miscarriage of justice (Roney v. United States, 6 Cir., 37 F.2d 341); and it also appearing from the record that the evidence amply supports the verdict and judgment and that no injustice has been done:

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Fredrick v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • October 13, 1947
    ...571, 40 L.Ed. 746; Bank of Italy v. F. Romeo & Co., 9 Cir., 287 F. 5, 7; Milleson v. United States, 8 Cir., 78 F.2d 60; Nailling v. United States, 6 Cir., 124 F.2d 431, certiorari denied, 316 U.S. 675, 62 S.Ct. 1043, 86 L.Ed. 1749, petitions for rehearing denied, 316 U.S. 710, 711, 62 S.Ct.......
  • Novick v. Gouldsberry
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • March 11, 1949
    ...an adverse verdict, is to be challenged on appeal. Baten v. Kirby Lumber Corporation, 5 Cir., 1939, 103 F.2d 272; Nailling v. United States, 6 Cir., 1941, 124 F.2d 431; Emanuel v. Kansas City Title and Trust Co., 8 Cir., 1942, 127 F.2d 175; Palmer v. Miller, 8 Cir., 1944, 145 F.2d 926, 930;......
  • Christensen v. Stuchlik
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • May 4, 1967
    ...v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 188 F.2d 691 (7th Cir., 1951); Sturm v. Chicago & N. W. Ry., 157 F.2d 407 (8th Cir., 1946); Nailling v. United States, 124 F.2d 431 (6th Cir., 1941); Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Yeatts, 122 F.2d 350 (4th Cir., 1941). See also: 2B Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Pro......
  • Cutter v. Cincinnati Union Terminal Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • June 18, 1966
    ...entry of a judgment for defendant. Johnson v. New York, N. H. & H. RR., 344 U.S. 48, 73 S.Ct. 125, 97 L.Ed. 77 (1952); Nailling v. United States, 124 F.2d 431 (CA 6, 1941) cert. den. 316 U.S. 675, 62 S.Ct. 1043, 86 L.Ed. 1749; Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. McCafferty, 169 F.2d 1 (CA 6, 19......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT