Nailling v. United States, 8955.
| Citation | 124 F.2d 431 |
| Decision Date | 10 December 1941 |
| Docket Number | No. 8955.,8955. |
| Parties | NAILLING v. UNITED STATES. |
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
Dwyane D. Maddox, of Huntingdon, Tenn., for appellant.
Wm. McClanahan, U. S. Atty., of Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.
Before SIMONS, ALLEN, and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.
This case came on to be heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel; and it appearing that the only question presented relates to the sufficiency of the evidence, and that no motion was made for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence; and it appearing that this court will not consider the sufficiency of the evidence unless it is satisfied that there has been a miscarriage of justice (Roney v. United States, 6 Cir., 37 F.2d 341); and it also appearing from the record that the evidence amply supports the verdict and judgment and that no injustice has been done:
It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Fredrick v. United States
...571, 40 L.Ed. 746; Bank of Italy v. F. Romeo & Co., 9 Cir., 287 F. 5, 7; Milleson v. United States, 8 Cir., 78 F.2d 60; Nailling v. United States, 6 Cir., 124 F.2d 431, certiorari denied, 316 U.S. 675, 62 S.Ct. 1043, 86 L.Ed. 1749, petitions for rehearing denied, 316 U.S. 710, 711, 62 S.Ct.......
-
Novick v. Gouldsberry
...an adverse verdict, is to be challenged on appeal. Baten v. Kirby Lumber Corporation, 5 Cir., 1939, 103 F.2d 272; Nailling v. United States, 6 Cir., 1941, 124 F.2d 431; Emanuel v. Kansas City Title and Trust Co., 8 Cir., 1942, 127 F.2d 175; Palmer v. Miller, 8 Cir., 1944, 145 F.2d 926, 930;......
-
Christensen v. Stuchlik
...v. Norfolk & W. Ry., 188 F.2d 691 (7th Cir., 1951); Sturm v. Chicago & N. W. Ry., 157 F.2d 407 (8th Cir., 1946); Nailling v. United States, 124 F.2d 431 (6th Cir., 1941); Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. Yeatts, 122 F.2d 350 (4th Cir., 1941). See also: 2B Barron & Holtzoff, Federal Practice and Pro......
-
Cutter v. Cincinnati Union Terminal Co.
...entry of a judgment for defendant. Johnson v. New York, N. H. & H. RR., 344 U.S. 48, 73 S.Ct. 125, 97 L.Ed. 77 (1952); Nailling v. United States, 124 F.2d 431 (CA 6, 1941) cert. den. 316 U.S. 675, 62 S.Ct. 1043, 86 L.Ed. 1749; Southeastern Greyhound Lines v. McCafferty, 169 F.2d 1 (CA 6, 19......