Nakdimen v. Baker, 11190.
Decision Date | 12 December 1938 |
Docket Number | No. 11190.,11190. |
Parties | NAKDIMEN v. BAKER. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
James B. McDonough, of Fort Smith, Ark. (George O. Patterson and Edward H. Patterson, both of Clarksville, Ark., on the brief), for appellant.
Harold R. Small, of St. Louis, Mo. (Thomas B. Pryor, of Fort Smith, Ark., Emmet T. Carter, of St. Louis, Mo., Pryor & Pryor, of Fort Smith, Ark., and Carter & Jones, of St. Louis, Mo., on the brief), for appellee.
Before STONE, GARDNER, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from a judgment at law in favor of the appellee, plaintiff below, against appellant, defendant below. The appeal presents but one question necessary to its determination. Other questions are raised in argument, but since, in the view we take of the issues, the judgment must be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial, all minor and incidental matters will be passed over because they may not arise on the second trial.
The ultimate question is whether the action is in assumpsit for damages for breach of contract or in tort for damages for conversion of personal property. The lower court submitted the case to the jury on the theory that it is an action in tort for conversion. In this we think he erred.
The court correctly summarized the contentions of the parties in the following instruction:
The plaintiff alleged that Nakdimen failed and refused to deliver the note and collateral on December 7 as he had agreed but that he converted them to his own use, and that he was indebted to plaintiff for the value of the 200 shares of stock in the City National Company. Before the trial the defendant moved the court to require the plaintiff "to declare whether he intends his suit to be one upon contract or one upon tort, and to elect upon which, whether contract or...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Myzel v. Fields
...to the defendant to allow plaintiff to pursue inconsistent forms of relief, the doctrine is still applied. Nakdimen v. Baker, 100 F.2d 195, 196-197 (8 Cir. 1938); Abdallah v. Abdallah, 359 F.2d 170, 175 (3 Cir. 1966). During the trial appellees urged that although they sought recision of th......
-
Nakdimen v. Baker
...Circuit Judge. This is the second appeal in this case. The opinion of this court on the first appeal is reported in Nakdimen v. Baker, 8 Cir., 100 F.2d 195, 196. The evidence is the same on both appeals. On the first appeal we held that the court erred in overruling the appellant's motion t......
- Turner v. New York Life Ins. Co.
-
In re Keel
...its claim now that the Court has disallowed it would permit the IRS to pursue inconsistent forms of relief. See Nakdimen v. Baker, 100 F.2d 195, 196-97 (8th Cir. 1938) (finding that federal pleading does not abandon the doctrine of election of remedies when it becomes prejudicial to allow a......