NantKwest, Inc. v. Matal, 2016-1794
Decision Date | 31 August 2017 |
Docket Number | 2016-1794 |
Citation | 869 F.3d 1327 (Mem) |
Parties | NANTKWEST, INC., Plaintiff–Appellee v. Joseph MATAL, Performing the Functions and Duties of the Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Defendant–Appellant |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit |
Alan J. Heinrich, Gary N. Frischling, Lauren Nicole Drake, Morgan Chu, Esq., Morgan Chu, Esq., Los Angeles, CA, Sandra Haberny, Irell & Manella LLP, Newport Beach, CA, for Plaintiff–Appellee.
Mark R. Freeman, Attorney, Jaynie Randall Lilley, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, Thomas L. Casagrande, Associate Solicitor, Nathan K. Kelley, Solicitor, Thomas W. Krause, Esq., Deputy Solicitor, Scott Weidenfeller, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office of the Solicitor, Alexandria, VA, for Defendant–Appellant.
Before Prost, Chief Judge, Newman, Lourie, Dyk, Moore, O'Malley, Reyna, Wallach, Taranto, Hughes, and Stoll, Circuit Judges.*
This case was argued before a panel of three judges on February 9, 2017. A sua sponte request for a poll on whether to reconsider this case was made. A poll was conducted and a majority of the judges who are in regular active service voted for sua sponte en banc consideration.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Nantkwest, Inc. v. Iancu
...proceedings." Id. at 1359.3 Our court voted sua sponte to hear the appeal en banc and vacated the panel's judgment. NantKwest, Inc. v. Matal , 869 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2017). We requested briefing on a single question: whether the panel "correctly determine[d] that 35 U.S.C. § 145's '[a]ll ......
-
Booking.Com B.V. v. Matal
...(Fed. Cir. 2017). The panel decision, in turn, has been vacated, pending en banc review by the Federal Circuit. See Nantkwest, Inc. v. Matal, 869 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2017). Although the issue of whether attorneys' fees are recoverable is unclear as to § 145, the law in this circuit, reflec......
-
Two Years in Review: Rehearing Petitions in Patent Cases
...the Federal Circuit has sua sponte ordered rehearing en banc and issued an opinion with an en banc footnote. NantKwest, Inc. v. Matal, 869 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. 2017) (mem.) (August 31, 2017 order for sua sponte rehearing en banc); Click-to-Call Techs., LP v. Ingenio, Inc., 899 F.3d 1321, 13......
-
Chapter §20.06 Attorney Fees in Exceptional Cases
...mandate. However, the panel's decision was thereafter vacated and sua sponte en banc consideration granted in NantKwest, Inc. v. Matal, 869 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 31, 2017) (order). In July 2018, the en banc majority held in NantKwest v. Iancu, 898 F.3d 1177 (Fed. Cir. July 27, 2018) (en......
-
I'm Not a Patent Lawyer, I'm a Problem Solver
...not need to rely on the employment agreement to prove its claims, arbitration is not required. Attorneys’ Fees NantKwest, Inc. v. Matal , 869 F.3d 1327, 124 U.S.P.Q.2d 1068 (Fed. Cir. 2017). The Federal Circuit, sitting en banc , issued an order vacating the prior decision of a three-judge ......
-
Held Hostage: Why Cyber Attacks Against Film and Media Industries Are on the Rise
...not need to rely on the employment agreement to prove its claims, arbitration is not required. Attorneys’ Fees NantKwest, Inc. v. Matal , 869 F.3d 1327, 124 U.S.P.Q.2d 1068 (Fed. Cir. 2017). The Federal Circuit, sitting en banc , issued an order vacating the prior decision of a three-judge ......
-
VACATUR PENDING EN BANC REVIEW.
...v. Dep't of the Army, 159 F. App'x 193 (Fed. Cir. 2006), vacating en banc 412 F.3d 1273 (Fed. Cir. 2005); NantKwest, Inc. v. Matal, 869 F.3d 1327 (Fed. Cir.), vacating en banc 860 F.3d 1352 (Fed. Cir. (121.) See, e.g., Gary B. v. Whitmer, 958 F.3d 1216 (6th Cir. 2020) (en banc). (122.) Only......