Napier v. Baker

CourtKentucky Court of Appeals
Writing for the CourtDRURY, C.
CitationNapier v. Baker, 235 Ky. 724, 32 S.W.2d 49 (Ky. Ct. App. 1930)
Decision Date24 October 1930
PartiesNAPIER et al. v. BAKER et al.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Perry County.

Action by T. G. Napier and others against Ira J. Baker and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.

Affirmed.

Jesse Morgan and F. J. Eversole, both of Hazard, for appellants.

W. H Miller, of Lexington, for appellee S. C. Coldwell.

W. A Stanfill, of Hazard, for appellees Baker and Crawford.

DRURY C.

T. G Napier and Leanah Napier began this suit to quiet their title to 400 acres of land and the timber thereon. The court adjudged Ira J. Baker and Nicholas Crawford to be the owners of the trees described in deeds (a) and (b) below and Ira J. Baker, Nicholas Crawford and S. C. Coldwell to be the owners of the trees described in deed (c) below, and the Napiers have appealed.

Deed (a).

On July 3, 1907, T. G. Napier, and wife and Leanah Napier, a widow, for a consideration of $700 cash conveyed to the Swann-Day Lumber Company the following timber on the land in question upon the following terms:

"Two thousand (2,000) choice white oak and chestnut oak trees to be selected by and branded with the registered trade mark or brand, or timber brand, of the party of the second part (D), Capital 'D' enclosed in a triangle."
"And it is further agreed that the party of the second part shall have its own time to take the said trees off and have the right of ingress and egress and regress for the purpose of cutting and removing said timber, together with the right of way over and to the lands of the said party of the first part and the free use of such stone and timber and dirt as may be necessary to make good roads, tram roads and good and sufficient dams that may be necessary for the removal of said timber, either by hauling, tramming or floating the same with the right to make build and erect the same necessary for the removing of the timber by hauling, tramming or floating, from the said lands or any lands adjacent thereto.

The party of the first part hereby guarantees the care and protection of the said trees hereby conveyed, and it is further understood and agreed by the party of the first part that in order to insure the title to the trees herein conveyed that the second party has and is hereby given a lien upon the lands above described; said lien to indemnify said party of the second part against any loss he may sustain by reason of the failure of the title to any part of said trees, in case the title of the party of the first part shall fail to any part thereof and thereby the party of the second part should lose any of the said trees."

Deed (b).

On that same day the Napiers, for a consideration of $200 cash, sold the Swann-Day Lumber Company, the following timber on this same land and on the same terms:

"Four hundred choice white oak and chestnut oak trees, to be selected by and branded with the registered trade mark or brand, or timber brand, of the party of the second part D; (Capital 'D' inclosed in a triangle)."

These deeds were recorded July 5, 1907.

Deed (c).

On November 24, 1914, the Napiers, for a consideration of $750 cash, sold and conveyed to John McIntosh the following timber on this same land upon the same terms as in deed (a):

"All the pine, ash, cucumber, lynn and poplar and hickory and 100 chestnut choice and all the oak trees standing and growing on the following described tract of land except black oak that have not been conveyed to Swann-Day Lumber Company and not branded by them."

This deed was recorded September 24, 1917. By mesne conveyances the property and rights granted in deeds (a) and (b) have been conveyed to and are now owned by Ira Baker and Nicholas Crawford, and those under deed (c) have been conveyed to and are now owned thus:

Nicholas Crawford and Ira Baker together own one half and the other half is owned by S. C. Coldwell.

The basis of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
6 cases
  • Karsner v. Commonwealth
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • October 24, 1930
  • Paullus v. Yarbrough
    • United States
    • Oregon Supreme Court
    • December 9, 1959
    ... ... Patton v. Lucy, 1940, 285 Ky. 694, 148 S.W.2d 1039; Napier v. Baker, 1930, 235 Ky. 724, 32 S.W.2d 49; Marshall v Lowd, 1958, 154 Me. 296, 147 A.2d 667; McCastle v. Scanlon, 1953, 337 Mich. 122, 59 N.W.2d 114; ... ...
  • RANKIN v. RIDGE
    • United States
    • New Mexico Supreme Court
    • January 13, 1949
    ... ... 1006, 138 Am.St.Rep. 1074; Strause v. Berger, 220 Pa. 367, 69 A. 818; West Lbr. Co. v. C. R. Cummings Export Co., Tex.Civ.App., 196 S.W. 546; Napier v. Baker, 235 Ky. 724, 32 S.W.2d 49; Cheatham v. Head, 203 Ky. 489, 262 S.W. 622; Pope v. Barnett, 45 Ga.App. 59, 163 S.E. 517; Lovelace-Eubanks Lbr ... ...
  • Bullitt Utilities, Inc. v. Ky. Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 2018-CA-000559-MR
    • United States
    • Kentucky Court of Appeals
    • May 17, 2019
    ... ... Asher Coal Min ... Co ., 172 F.2d 243, 247 (6th Cir. 1949) (citing Napier v ... Baker , 235 Ky. 724, 32 S.W.2d 49 (1930); Duncan v ... Mason , 239 Ky. 570, 39 S.W.2d 1006 (1931); Cox v ... Colossal Cavern Co ., 210 Ky. 612, ... ...
  • Get Started for Free