Narrod v. Napoli, No. 07–CV–6071 (VEB).

CourtUnited States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court of Western District of New York
Writing for the CourtDECISION AND ORDER
Citation763 F.Supp.2d 359
PartiesDustin NARROD, Petitioner,v.Superintendent NAPOLI, Southport Correctional Facility, Respondent.
Docket NumberNo. 07–CV–6071 (VEB).
Decision Date04 February 2011

763 F.Supp.2d 359

Dustin NARROD, Petitioner,
v.
Superintendent NAPOLI, Southport Correctional Facility, Respondent.

No. 07–CV–6071 (VEB).

United States District Court, W.D. New York.

Feb. 4, 2011.


[763 F.Supp.2d 366]

Dustin Narrod, Auburn, NY, pro se.Leslie E. Swift, Rochester, NY, for Respondent.

DECISION AND ORDER
VICTOR E. BIANCHINI, United States Magistrate Judge.I. Introduction

Acting pro se, Dustin Narrod (“Narrod” or “Petitioner”) has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. 2254 challenging the constitutionality of his detention in state custody pursuant to a judgment of conviction entered against him, following a jury trial, on charges of second degree (intentional) murder and third degree arson.

The parties have consented to disposition of this matter by a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1).

II. Factual Background and Procedural HistoryA. The Trial

Eighty-three-year-old Jean McAllister (“McAllister” or “the victim”) was last seen alive on the afternoon of July 31, 2000. One of her neighbors saw her sometime between 4:00 and 4:30 p.m. sweeping her driveway on the corner of Manitou Road and Peck Road in the Town of Parma (Hilton). T.333.1

On Friday, August 4, 2000, McAllister's sister-in-law, Betty Twilliger (“Twilliger”) called McAllister's house before stopping by to take her grocery shopping, as was Twilliger's custom. However, each of the three or more times she called, she heard a busy signal, which was unusual. T.357–59. Twilliger went to McAllister's house. When she was unable to gain entrance through the kitchen door, she went to the front door which was ajar (McAllister usually kept the front door open, with the screen closed, in the summer when she was home.) Upon entering, Twilliger immediately realized there had been a fire. T.360–62. She could not find McAllister in any of the main floor rooms, and the bedroom was “all burnt up.”

Twilliger enlisted the help of a neighbor, who telephoned the fire department. T.367–68, 379, 382, 385–86. The firefighters found no active fires burning. McAllister, however, lay dead in the furnace room in the basement. T.418, 421.

McAllister's body was “burned very, very badly” and the “whole left side [of her body] had received terrible burns.” T.526. McAllister's body had been charred beyond visual recognition; she was identified by her dental records. T.723. There were a number of matches scattered on her corpse and sitting next to her were a bottle of charcoal lighter fluid and smoke detector with the 9–volt battery removed. T.526. The victim's head was covered with a towel, and a white rope was draped around her upper torso. T.526. Wooden matches were on the ground surrounding her and there were newspapers on top of, under, and around her. T.526, 532. On top of the body lay a green suitcase containing silver dollars, half dollars, a roll of coins, and a cigarette butt. T.644. Another cigarette butt was recovered from the fire debris surrounding the corpse. T.639.

[763 F.Supp.2d 367]

The medical examiner found that McAllister had several lacerations on her skull, indicating blunt force trauma. T.967–68. The skull showed multiple fractures and, internally, there was a laceration of the brain directly underneath, as well as some hemorrhaging over one of the layers of the outer surface of the brain. T.972. The broken bone in the skull was displaced inward away from its normal location. T.973. The injuries indicated that McAllister had received at least four blows of considerable force with some type of blunt instrument. T.973–74. There was bruising on the right deltoid, indicating some trauma to the shoulder. T.970.

In addition, there were two stab wounds to the neck. T.967–68. A steak-knife blade with the handle missing was found embedded in the cervical neck area. T.636–38, 953. There were no petechial hemorrhages which typically are found in asphyxia cases. This led the medical examiner to rule out strangulation as a factor in McAllister's death, the cause of which was determined to be blunt force trauma to the head. T.977.

A pattern of blood spatters at the base of the stairs was consistent with the victim being struck repeatedly with an instrument while lying on the floor there. T.615. Behind the stairwell was found a knife handle that matched the blade embedded in the victim's neck. T.640–41. A trail of blood led from the bottom of the stairs, through to the furnace room where McAllister's body was found. T.532–33.

Beside the trail of blood stood a partially consumed bottle of “Tahitian Treat” soda. T.534

When the soot was removed from the basement floor, the investigators found bloody shoeprints underneath. T.669. Examination revealed that they were consistent with the tread pattern of men's size 9 1/2 Dexter brand shoes, either the “Explorer” or “Excursion” style. T.1094–96. Narrod wears size 9 1/2 shoes and was known to wear shoes of that style. The search of his house revealed two (2) pairs of Dexter shoes and four (4) Dexter shoeboxes. T.699, 867–68, 879–80. See also Property Custody Report, submitted as part of Respondent's Appendix of State Court Records (“Resp't App.”), which is unpaginated.

A check of the telephone records revealed that McAllister's phone line had gone dead at exactly 1:30:39 a.m. on August 2, 2000. T.479. At some point before that time, the wall-mounted phone in McAllister's basement had burned off and fallen onto the fire debris on the floor. T.525. A telephone company technician stated that a wall-mounted phone being burned in that manner could definitely cause the “hard short” out-of-service message found in McAllister's phone records. T.479. Anyone calling McAllister's number after the “hard short” would get a busy signal, as Twilliger had gotten when she called on August 4, 2000. T.479. No service calls were made on McAllister's phone line after 1:30 a.m. on August 2nd. T.480. The time of fire was thus determined to be August 2, 2000, at 1:30 a.m. Because the victim's airway contained no soot, the medical examiner determined that she was already dead when the fire was started. T.975.

There was additional physical evidence recovered on the main floor of the house. On the dining room table stood an orange juice container; both the container and the table were smoke-damaged and completely covered with soot. T.500. There was no soot underneath the container. Three cigarette butts were floating in the remaining orange juice. T.629.

In addition to the two fires in the basement, there was evidence of five (5) fires upstairs. In the livingroom, there had

[763 F.Supp.2d 368]

been a fire on one wall by a large window, which incinerated the draperies and melted a TV and VCR. T.492–93. The hallway carpeting had a burn-pattern. T.504. Evidence of three (3) separate fires was found in the master bedroom. One had started on the bed and had traveled up the headboard onto the wall and ceiling. T.516–17. A second had started on the floor between two dressers and continued up the wall. T.517. Another had been started inside one of the dresser drawers. T.517.

The arson investigator concluded that the fires had begun burning very fast and hot. They produced a great deal of soot and smoke, but quickly sucked up all the available oxygen and, consequently, burned themselves out. T.536–37. The carpet and carpet padding were found to contain remnants of gasoline and a medium petroleum distillate. T.1123. The towel found draped on the pool table in the basement, as well as a piece of rug from under the victim's body, also contained a medium petroleum distillate. T.1120. The contents remaining in the bottle of charcoal starter fluid was analyzed and found to be a medium petroleum distillate consistent with that found in the carpet, carpet padding, towel, and rug samples. T.1129–30. Gasoline was found in the draintrap of the bathroom sink. T.1127–28.

The police investigated a number of suspects, including one Frederick Allen Taylor (“Taylor”). As part of their canvass of the neighborhood, the police interviewed Narrod on August 24, 2000. T.546. Narrod stated that he had no information about the incident, that he did not know McAllister, that he had never been over to her house or inside her house, and that he had never done any work for her. T.551–52.

In the meantime, several weeks after the August 2000 murder, Narrod was hanging out with some friends. Someone asked him “if he thought it was weird that somebody had been killed right down the street from him.” T.575, 580. Narrod responded that it did not seem weird to him and that “somebody had tried to go back and set the house on fire and they didn't find the body for two days.” T.575. The police discovered, after reviewing all of the information disseminated by the press and media at the time of the crime, that the sheriff's department merely had said that McAllister had been killed sometime between July 30th and August 4th. T.1006, 1018. Thus, it was only through first-hand knowledge that Narrod could have known that McAllister's body was not discovered until two days after the blaze.

According to Narrod's friends, he had also told them that the police had questioned him about the murder because he had walked past McAllister's house on the night of the murder. T.578–79. However, the police did not know whether he had walked past the victim's house. Furthermore, the police did not state to him that was why he was being questioned. T.546–48.

On September 16, 2000, about a month and a half after the murder, Narrod was arrested for several unrelated, non-violent felony offense for which he faced a maximum possible sentence of two and two-thirds to eight years in prison. T.872. Curiously, at the end of October or the beginning of November, Narrod wrote a letter to an ex-girlfriend in which he stated, “I guess by now you probably heard I was arrested for a lot of things and I'm in very big trouble. You were right about my drug addiction, I just never seen...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 practice notes
  • Schlesinger v. United States, No. 09–CV–4278 (ADS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • February 6, 2012
    ...Sixth [898 F.Supp.2d 515]Amendment rights, and therefore denies his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Narrod v. Napoli, 763 F.Supp.2d 359, 385 (W.D.N.Y.2011) (denying habeas petition where petitioner alleged that the court erred in admitting testimony of arson expert that the fire w......
  • Rios v. Lempke, 11-CV-00205F
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court of Western District of New York
    • May 22, 2014
    ...of, clearly established federal constitutional law as determined by the Supreme Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); see Narrod v. Napoli, 763 F.Supp.2d 359, 370 (W.D.N.Y. 2011). In this case, Petitioner argues that his conviction on charges of First Degree Burglary and Robbery violated the Due P......
  • Schlesinger v. United States, 09-CV-4278 (ADS)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • February 6, 2012
    ...of the petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights, and therefore denies his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Narrod v. Napoli, 763 F. Supp. 2d 359, 385 (W.D.N.Y. 2011) (denying habeas petition where petitioner alleged that the court erred in admitting testimony of arson expert that the fi......
  • Krider v. Conover, No. 11-3010-SAC
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. District of Kansas
    • April 11, 2012
    ...Reasonable jurists may find this court's assessment of that constitutional to be debatable or wrong. See e.g., Narrod v. Napoli, 763 F.Supp.2d 359 (W.D.N.Y. 2011) and cases cited therein (finding the State court unreasonably applied clearly-established Supreme Court precedent concerning the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
7 cases
  • Schlesinger v. United States, No. 09–CV–4278 (ADS).
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • February 6, 2012
    ...Sixth [898 F.Supp.2d 515]Amendment rights, and therefore denies his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Narrod v. Napoli, 763 F.Supp.2d 359, 385 (W.D.N.Y.2011) (denying habeas petition where petitioner alleged that the court erred in admitting testimony of arson expert that the fire w......
  • Rios v. Lempke, 11-CV-00205F
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court of Western District of New York
    • May 22, 2014
    ...of, clearly established federal constitutional law as determined by the Supreme Court. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1); see Narrod v. Napoli, 763 F.Supp.2d 359, 370 (W.D.N.Y. 2011). In this case, Petitioner argues that his conviction on charges of First Degree Burglary and Robbery violated the Due P......
  • Schlesinger v. United States, 09-CV-4278 (ADS)
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 2nd Circuit. United States District Court (Eastern District of New York)
    • February 6, 2012
    ...of the petitioner's Sixth Amendment rights, and therefore denies his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. See Narrod v. Napoli, 763 F. Supp. 2d 359, 385 (W.D.N.Y. 2011) (denying habeas petition where petitioner alleged that the court erred in admitting testimony of arson expert that the fi......
  • Krider v. Conover, No. 11-3010-SAC
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. District of Kansas
    • April 11, 2012
    ...Reasonable jurists may find this court's assessment of that constitutional to be debatable or wrong. See e.g., Narrod v. Napoli, 763 F.Supp.2d 359 (W.D.N.Y. 2011) and cases cited therein (finding the State court unreasonably applied clearly-established Supreme Court precedent concerning the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT