Nash v. Harshman

Decision Date01 May 1893
Docket NumberNo. 957,957
Citation37 L.Ed. 727,13 S.Ct. 845,149 U.S. 263
PartiesNASH v. HARSHMAN
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

In Equity. This was originally a civil action, brought, under the Code of Civil Procedure of Ohio, in the court of common pleas of Logan county, by George W. Harshman, asking a personal judgment against John A. Nash on a note of $26,000, and setting up the execution of a mortgage by Nash to secure the same; also, alleging the subsequent conveyance of the mortgaged premises by Nash to Charles A. Dupee, who, with others, was made a defendant. Nash and Dupee filed answers, and, after the case was at issue it was removed to the circuit court for the northern district of Ohio, under the local prejudice act. In that court the action proceeded merely as a suit in equity to foreclose the mortgage, and a decree was rendered for the sale of the lands. From this decree, Nash appeals. The cause is now heard on motion to dismiss the appeal and affirm the judgment. Appeal dismissed.

One of the grounds relied on by the appellees was that the appeal was insufficient because it was taken by Nash, against whom, as the bill was treated in the circuit court, no relief was demanded, and no decree was made, and because Dupee, whose rights alone were affected by it, was not a party to the appeal.

Louis D. Johnson, for the motion.

Mr. Chief Justice FULLER.

The appeal is dismissed. Hohorst v. Packet Co., 148 U. S. 262, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 590.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Spalding v. McKnight
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • December 19, 1944
  • Roberts, Johnson & Rand Shoe Co. v. Shepherd
    • United States
    • Kansas Court of Appeals
    • December 1, 1902
    ...v. Hathorn, 78 N.Y. 226; Williams v. Tel. Co., 93 N.Y. 164; Hardee v. Wilson, 146 U.S. 179; Hohorst v. H. P. Co., 148 U.S. 460; Nash v. Harshman, 149 U.S. 263; Hampton Rouse, 13 Wall. 187; Masterson v. Howard, 10 Wall. 416. (6) The uncontroverted evidence shows that the firm of Goff Bros. w......
  • Robertson v. Cockrell
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • December 23, 1913
  • Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison Co
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • May 1, 1893

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT