Nash v. United States
| Decision Date | 29 November 1910 |
| Docket Number | 1,951. |
| Citation | 186 F. 489 |
| Parties | NASH et al. v. UNITED STATES. [1] |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Georgia.
Criminal prosecution by the United States against the American Naval Stores Company, Edmund S. Nash, and others. From a judgment of conviction, defendants bring error. Affirmed.
See, also, 172 F. 455; 186 F. 592.
Samuel B. Adams and Peter W. Meldrim, for plaintiffs in error.
Alexander Akerman, Asst. U.S. Atty., and W. M. Toomer, Special Asst. U.S. Atty.
Before PARDEE and SHELBY, Circuit Judges, and FOSTER, District Judge.
A majority of the court is of opinion that there is no error in the record. The judgment of the Circuit Court is therefore affirmed.
---------
Notes:
[1] Rehearing denied December 20, 1910.
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Weiss v. United States
...to charge that a verdict might be permitted on any one of them when some of them would not warrant a finding of conspiracy. Nash v. United States, 5 Cir., 186 F. 489, 6 Moore v. United States, 150 U.S. 57, 14 S.Ct. 26, 37 L.Ed. 996; Lynch v. United States, 4 Cir., 12 F.2d 193; United States......
- Columbus Compress Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
-
United States v. DRIVERS, CHAUFFEURS, ETC.
...and second grounds of the motion to quash are without merit. See Sec. 1025, R.S., 18 U.S. C. Sec. 556, 18 U.S.C.A. § 556; Nash v. United States, 5 Cir., 186 F. 489, reversed on other grounds, 229 U.S. 373, 33 S.Ct. 780, 57 L.Ed. 1232; Beard v. United States, 65 App.D.C. 231, 234, 82 F.2d 83......