Nat'l Bank of Ark. v. River Crossing Partners, LLC

Docket Number10-1337
Decision Date10 November 2011

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
22 cases
  • Stokes v. Stokes
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • April 28, 2016
    ...in the circuit courts. See id. It did not alter or expand a party's right to trial by jury. See, e.g., Nat'l Bank of Ark. v. River Crossing Partners, 2011 Ark. 475, 385 S.W.3d 754. Our opinions since 2001 have affirmed the historical test by looking to the remedies sought in the complaint. ......
  • Yanmar Co. v. Slater
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • March 8, 2012
    ...of a motion for directed verdict is whether the jury's verdict is supported by substantial evidence. Nat'l Bank of Ark. v. River Crossing Partners, LLC, 2011 Ark. 475, 385 S.W.3d 754. We reverse only if there is no substantial evidence to support the jury's verdict, and the moving party is ......
  • Tilley v. Malvern Nat'l Bank
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • December 7, 2017
    ...or to a jury as a legal matter, a circuit court must review the historical nature of the claim. Nat'l Bank of Ark. v. River Crossing Partners, LLC, 2011 Ark. 475, at 8, 385 S.W.3d 754, 759 (citing Cruthis, supra ). Our opinions since 2001 have affirmed this historical test by looking to the......
  • Dollar Gen. Corp. v. Elder
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • May 28, 2020
    ...arising therefrom in the light most favorable to the party on whose behalf judgment was entered. Nat'l Bank of Ark. v. River Crossing Partners, LLC , 2011 Ark. 475, 385 S.W.3d 754. A motion for directed verdict should be denied when there is a conflict in the evidence, or when the evidence ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Doing Equity in Bankruptcy
    • United States
    • Emory University School of Law Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal No. 34-1, November 2017
    • Invalid date
    ...Ctr., LLC v. Emmert, 323 P.3d 250, 255 (Or. 2014) (constructive trust).16. See, e.g., Nat'l Bank of Ark. v. River Crossing Partners, LLC, 385 S.W.3d 754, 760 (Ark. 2011) (equitable lien).17. See, e.g., Homecomings Fin. Network, Inc. v. Brown, 343 S.W.3d 681, 684 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011) (subroga......