Nat'l Live Stock Comm'n Co. v. Taliaferro, Case Number: 559 Ind Ter T

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
Writing for the CourtHAYES, J.
Citation20 Okla. 177,1908 OK 14,93 P. 983
PartiesNATIONAL LIVE STOCK COMMISSION CO. et al. v. TALIAFERRO et al.
Docket NumberCase Number: 559 Ind Ter T
Decision Date04 February 1908

1908 OK 14
93 P. 983
20 Okla. 177

NATIONAL LIVE STOCK COMMISSION CO. et al.
v.
TALIAFERRO et al.

Case Number: 559 Ind Ter T

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided: February 4, 1908


Syllabus

¶0 1. STATUTES--Adoption from Arkansas--Previous Construction. It will be presumed that Congress, in adopting the statutes of Arkansas for the Indian Territory, adopted them with the construction anti interpretation that had been placed on them by the Supreme Court of Arkansas prior to their adoption by Congress.

2. CHATTEL MORTGAGES--Failure to Extend--Conversion of Property--Action by Mortgagee Against Purchaser. An action for conversion under the statutes of Arkansas on mortgages, put in force in the Indian Territory, will not lie in favor of the mortgagee under a mortgage against the purchaser of the mortgaged property, where, the mortgage was filed, but not recorded, and where such action is not begun until after the lapse of one year from the filing of such mortgage unless such mortgage has been extended as required by statute, although the purchaser purchased the mortgaged property before the expiration of one year from the filing of the mortgage.

Error from the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory; before Hosea Townsend, Judge.

Action by the National Live Stock Commission Company and R. H. McNatt, trustee, against W. N. Taliaferro and D. B. Taliaferro. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal, Affirmed.

This action was instituted on the l2th day of August, 1903, in the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory, at Tishomingo, by the National Livestock Commission Company and R. H. McNatt, trustee, against W. N. Taliaferro and D. B. Taliaferro. The portion of the plaintiffs' complaint that attempts to allege a cause of action against the defendants is as follows:

"For cause of action plaintiffs state that on April 26, 1900, one Sam Loughmiller, of Grayson county, Tex., for a valid consideration executed to R. H. McNatt, trustee for the National Live Stock Commission Co., a deed of trust covering 135 head of steer yearlings and 30 cows, branded L on left side, and located in Hume pasture, near Woodville, Ind. T., a certified copy of said deed of trust being attached hereto and made a part hereof, and marked 'Exhibit A.' That said deed of trust was properly indorsed and filed with the United States clerk at Ardmore, Ind. T., on May 5, 1900. That in the month of November or December, 1900, while said deed of trust was in full force and effect, and without the consent or knowledge of these plaintiffs, or either of them, the said Sam Loughmiller sold said cattle to the defendants herein W. N. Taliaferro and D. B. Taliaferro, who converted same to their own use and benefit; but plaintiff alleges that said mortgage was not extended by filing an extension affidavit as required by the statute, and that when this suit was filed the same was not properly recorded or filed for record. That by the terms of said deed of trust these plaintiffs had a special property interest in said cattle at time of said conversion by said defendants, and at time of said conversion said cattle were of the reasonable value of $ 1,500."

A copy of the deed of trust attached to said complaint fully confirms the allegations set out in plaintiffs' complaint as to the facts alleged therein relative to said deed of trust.

To plaintiffs' complaint defendants filed a demurrer, which was sustained by the court. Plaintiffs thereupon refused to plead further, and the court rendered judgment dismissing the action and taxing the costs against plaintiffs.

Whereupon the case was appealed by the plaintiffs to the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory, where it was pending at the time of the admission of Oklahoma as a state, and comes to this court under the provisions of the enabling act.

Herbert, Walker & Cannon, for appellants.

Cruce, Cruce & Bleakmore and Henshaw & Faulkner, for appellees.

HAYES, J.

¶1 (after stating the facts as above). Appellants make two assignments of error, both of which go to the action of the court in sustaining appellees' to the complaint and in dismissing said cause from the docket of the trial court and taxing costs against the appellants. On May 2, 1890, Congress by an act extended over and put in force in the Indian Territory certain chapters of Mansfield's Digest of the Statutes of Arkansas, published in 1884. Among the chapters of said digest put in force in the Indian Territory was chapter 110, on "Mortgages," which contained, among other sections, the following sections:

"Sec. 4742. All mortgages, whether for real or personal estate, shall be proved or acknowledged in the same manner that deeds for the conveyance of real estate are now required by law to be proved or acknowledged; and when so proved or acknowledged shall be recorded if for lands, in the county or counties in which the lands lie, and, if for personal property, in the county in which the mortgagor resides.

"Sec. 4743. Every
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. Burgess, Case Number: 631 Ind Ter T
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • 23 d4 Julho d4 1908
    ...as a part of the state of Oklahoma. Foreman v. Midland Valley Railway Co. (Ind. T.) 104 S.W. 806; National Live Stock Co. v. Taliaferro, 20 Okla. 177, 93 P. 983. ¶9 In the case of Little Rock & Ft. Smith Railroad Co. v. Dyer, supra, decided by the Supreme Court of the state of Arkansas at i......
  • St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Bruner, Case Number: 5716
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • 9 d2 Novembro d2 1915
    ...26 Okla. 13, 108 P. 386; Farmers' State Bank v. Stephenson, 23 Okla. 695, 102 P. 992; National Live Stock Commission Co. v. Taliaferro, 20 Okla. 177, 93 P. 983. ¶7 It was therefore settled by a long line of uniform decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of Kansas prior to the adoption of t......
  • Hutchinson v. Krueger, Case Number: 1661
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • 14 d2 Maio d2 1912
    ...the construction of such statute placed thereon by the court of last resort of such sister state. National L. S. Com. Co. v. Taliaferro, 20 Okla. 177, 93 P. 983, and cases cited. The question seems to have had the consideration of the Kansas Supreme Court in Emory Wilson v. School District ......
  • Conwill v. Eldridge, Case Number: 5890
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • 10 d2 Dezembro d2 1918
    ...adopted the construction which had been placed on it by the highest court of that state. National Live Stock Com. Co. v. Taliaferro, 20 Okla. 177, 93 P. 983; Western Terra Cotta Co. v. City of Shawnee, 39 Okla. 716, 136 P. 595; St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. Bruner, 52 Okla. 349, 152 P. 1103; Ams......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT