Nat'l Live Stock Comm'n Co. v. Taliaferro
Decision Date | 04 February 1908 |
Docket Number | Case Number: 559 Ind Ter T |
Parties | NATIONAL LIVE STOCK COMMISSION CO. et al. v. TALIAFERRO et al. |
Court | Oklahoma Supreme Court |
¶0 1. STATUTES--Adoption from Arkansas--Previous Construction. It will be presumed that Congress, in adopting the statutes of Arkansas for the Indian Territory, adopted them with the construction anti interpretation that had been placed on them by the Supreme Court of Arkansas prior to their adoption by Congress.
2. CHATTEL MORTGAGES--Failure to Extend--Conversion of Property--Action by Mortgagee Against Purchaser. An action for conversion under the statutes of Arkansas on mortgages, put in force in the Indian Territory, will not lie in favor of the mortgagee under a mortgage against the purchaser of the mortgaged property, where, the mortgage was filed, but not recorded, and where such action is not begun until after the lapse of one year from the filing of such mortgage unless such mortgage has been extended as required by statute, although the purchaser purchased the mortgaged property before the expiration of one year from the filing of the mortgage.
Error from the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory; before Hosea Townsend, Judge.
Action by the National Live Stock Commission Company and R. H. McNatt, trustee, against W. N. Taliaferro and D. B. Taliaferro. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal, Affirmed.
This action was instituted on the l2th day of August, 1903, in the United States Court for the Southern District of the Indian Territory, at Tishomingo, by the National Livestock Commission Company and R. H. McNatt, trustee, against W. N. Taliaferro and D. B. Taliaferro. The portion of the plaintiffs' complaint that attempts to allege a cause of action against the defendants is as follows:
A copy of the deed of trust attached to said complaint fully confirms the allegations set out in plaintiffs' complaint as to the facts alleged therein relative to said deed of trust.
To plaintiffs' complaint defendants filed a demurrer, which was sustained by the court. Plaintiffs thereupon refused to plead further, and the court rendered judgment dismissing the action and taxing the costs against plaintiffs.
Whereupon the case was appealed by the plaintiffs to the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory, where it was pending at the time of the admission of Oklahoma as a state, and comes to this court under the provisions of the enabling act.
Herbert, Walker & Cannon, for appellants.
Cruce, Cruce & Bleakmore and Henshaw & Faulkner, for appellees.
¶1 ( ). Appellants make two assignments of error, both of which go to the action of the court in sustaining appellees' to the complaint and in dismissing said cause from the docket of the trial court and taxing costs against the appellants. On May 2, 1890, Congress by an act extended over and put in force in the Indian Territory certain chapters of Mansfield's Digest of the Statutes of Arkansas, published in 1884. Among the chapters of said digest put in force in the Indian Territory was chapter 110, on "Mortgages," which contained, among other sections, the following sections:
¶2 On February 3, 1897 (29 Star. 510, c. 136), an act of Congress, amending section 4742 of Mansfield's Digest of the Statutes of Arkansas [Ind. T. Ann. St. 1899, §§ 3053], above set out, was approved, which amendment, omitting the caption, was as follows:
¶3 In the deed of trust attached to the complaint of plaintiffs as an exhibit it is stated that Sam Loughmiller, the mortgagor, was at the time of the execution of the same a resident of Grayson county, Texas, but that the property mortgaged was located in the Chickasaw Nation, Indian Territory, which was a part of the Southern District of the Indian Territory. The proper place, then, for recording said deed of trust was in the office of the clerk of the United States Court at Ardmore, Ind. T., where it was filed, but not recorded, on the 5th day of May, 1900. Therefore, under the pleadings in the trial court and the assignments of error in this court, there is but one question presented to this court for its consideration and answer to-wit: Could a trustee, joined by the beneficiary, under a deed of trust conveying personal property which had been filed as by law provided, maintain an action for conversion against one who had purchased the mortgaged property prior to the expiration of 12 months from date of the filing of the deed of trust, when no affidavit for a renewal or extension of said deed of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Choctaw, O. & G. R. Co. v. Burgess
...into the Union as a part of the state of Oklahoma. Foreman v. Midland Valley Railway Co. (Ind. T.) 104 S.W. 806; National Live Stock Co. v. Taliaferro, 20 Okla. 177, 93 P. 983. ¶9 In the case of Little Rock & Ft. Smith Railroad Co. v. Dyer, supra, decided by the Supreme Court of the state o......
-
St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. Bruner
...Grain & Produce Co., 26 Okla. 13, 108 P. 386; Farmers' State Bank v. Stephenson, 23 Okla. 695, 102 P. 992; National Live Stock Commission Co. v. Taliaferro, 20 Okla. 177, 93 P. 983. ¶7 It was therefore settled by a long line of uniform decisions rendered by the Supreme Court of Kansas prior......
-
Hutchinson v. Krueger
...adopted also the construction of such statute placed thereon by the court of last resort of such sister state. National L. S. Com. Co. v. Taliaferro, 20 Okla. 177, 93 P. 983, and cases cited. The question seems to have had the consideration of the Kansas Supreme Court in Emory Wilson v. Sch......
-
Conwill v. Eldridge
...Legislature adopted the construction which had been placed on it by the highest court of that state. National Live Stock Com. Co. v. Taliaferro, 20 Okla. 177, 93 P. 983; Western Terra Cotta Co. v. City of Shawnee, 39 Okla. 716, 136 P. 595; St. L. & S. F. R. Co. v. Bruner, 52 Okla. 349, 152 ......