Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv.

Decision Date02 April 2018
Docket Number No. 17-35502, No. 18-35152, No. 17-35463, No. 17-35465, No. 18-35111,No. 17-35462, No. 17-35466, No. 17-35467,17-35462
Citation886 F.3d 803
Parties NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION; Idaho Wildlife Federation; Washington Wildlife Federation ; Sierra Club; Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc.; Institute for Fisheries Resources; Idaho Rivers United ; Idaho Steelhead and Salmon United; Northwest Sport Fishing Industry Association; Salmon for All ; Columbia Riverkeeper; NW Energy Coalition ; Federation of Fly Fishers; American Rivers, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, State of Oregon, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE; U.S. Army Corp of Engineers; United States Bureau of Reclamation, Defendants-Appellants, and State of Washington; State of Montana; State of Idaho; Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes; Inland Ports and Navigation Group; Northwest River Partners; Northwest Irrigation Utilities ; Public Power Council ; Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association, Intervenor-Defendants. National Wildlife Federation; Idaho Wildlife Federation; Washington Wildlife Federation ; Sierra Club; Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc.; Institute for Fisheries Resources; Idaho Rivers United ; Idaho Steelhead and Salmon United; Northwest Sport Fishing Industry Association; Salmon for All ; Columbia Riverkeeper; NW Energy Coalition ; Federation of Fly Fishers; American Rivers, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, State of Oregon, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. National Marine Fisheries Service; U.S. Army Corp of Engineers; United States Bureau of Reclamation, Defendants, State of Washington; State of Montana; State of Idaho; Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes; Inland Ports and Navigation Group; Northwest Irrigation Utilities ; Public Power Council ; Columbia-snake River Irrigators Association, Intervenor-Defendants, and Northwest River Partners, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. National Wildlife Federation; Idaho Wildlife Federation; Washington Wildlife Federation ; Sierra Club; Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc.; Institute for Fisheries Resources; Idaho Rivers United ; Idaho Steelhead and Salmon United; Northwest Sport Fishing Industry Association; Salmon for All ; Columbia Riverkeeper; NW Energy Coalition ; Federation of Fly Fishers; American Rivers, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, State of Oregon, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. National Marine Fisheries Service; U.S. Army Corp of Engineers; United States Bureau of Reclamation, Defendants, State of Washington; State of Montana; Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes; Inland Ports and Navigation Group; Northwest River Partners; Northwest Irrigation Utilities ; Public Power Council ; Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association, Intervenor-Defendants, and State of Idaho, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. National Wildlife Federation; Idaho Wildlife Federation; Washington Wildlife Federation ; Sierra Club; Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc.; Institute for Fisheries Resources; Idaho Rivers United ; Idaho Steelhead and Salmon United; Northwest Sport Fishing Industry Association; Salmon for All ; Columbia Riverkeeper; NW Energy Coalition ; Federation of Fly Fishers; American Rivers, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, State of Oregon, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. National Marine Fisheries Service; U.S. Army Corp of Engineers; United States Bureau of Reclamation, Defendants, State of Washington; State of Montana; State of Idaho; Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes; Northwest River Partners; Northwest Irrigation Utilities ; Public Power Council ; Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association, Intervenor-Defendants, and Inland Ports and Navigation Group, Intervenor-Defendant-appellant. National Wildlife Federation; Idaho Wildlife Federation; Washington Wildlife Federation ; Sierra Club; Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc.; Institute for Fisheries Resources; Idaho Rivers United ; Idaho Steelhead and Salmon United; Northwest Sport Fishing Industry Association; Salmon for All ; Columbia Riverkeeper; NW Energy Coalition ; Federation of Fly Fishers; American Rivers, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, State of Oregon, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. National Marine Fisheries Service; U.S. Army Corp of Engineers; United States Bureau of Reclamation, Defendants, State of Washington; State of Idaho; Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes; Inland Ports and Navigation Group; Northwest River Partners; Northwest Irrigation Utilities ; Public Power Council ; Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association, Intervenor-Defendants, and State of Montana, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant. National Wildlife Federation; Idaho Wildlife Federation; Washington Wildlife Federation ; Sierra Club; Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc.; Institute for Fisheries Resources; Idaho Rivers United ; Idaho Steelhead and Salmon United; Northwest Sport Fishing Industry Association; Salmon for All ; Columbia Riverkeeper; NW Energy Coalition ; Federation of Fly Fishers; American Rivers, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, State of Oregon, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. National Marine Fisheries Service; U.S. Army Corp of Engineers; United States Bureau of Reclamation, Defendants, State of Washington; State of Montana; State of Idaho; Inland Ports and Navigation Group; Northwest River Partners; Northwest Irrigation Utilities ; Public Power Council ; Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association, Intervenor-Defendants, and Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, Intervenor-Defendants-Appellants. National Wildlife Federation; Idaho Wildlife Federation; Washington Wildlife Federation ; Sierra Club; Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc.; Institute for Fisheries Resources; Idaho Rivers United ; Idaho Steelhead and Salmon United; Northwest Sport Fishing Industry Association; Salmon for All ; Columbia Riverkeeper; NW Energy Coalition ; Federation of Fly Fishers; American Rivers, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, State of Oregon, Intervenor-Plaintiff-appellee, v. National Marine Fisheries Service; U.S. Army Corp of Engineers; United States Bureau of Reclamation, Defendants-Appellants, and State of Washington; State of Montana; State of Idaho; Inland Ports and Navigation Group; Northwest River Partners; Northwest Irrigation Utilities ; Public Power Council ; Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association; Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, Intervenor-Defendants. National Wildlife Federation; Idaho Wildlife Federation; Washington Wildlife Federation ; Sierra Club; Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, Inc.; Institute for Fisheries Resources; Idaho Rivers United ; Idaho Steelhead and Salmon United; Northwest Sport Fishing Industry Association; Salmon for All ; Columbia Riverkeeper; NW Energy Coalition ; Federation of Fly Fishers; American Rivers, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees, State of Oregon, Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee, v. National Marine Fisheries Service; U.S. Army Corp of Engineers; United States Bureau of Reclamation, Defendants, State of Washington; State of Montana; State of Idaho; Inland Ports and Navigation Group; Northwest Irrigation Utilities ; Public Power Council ; Columbia-Snake River Irrigators Association; Kootenai Tribe of Idaho; Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes, Intervenor-Defendants, and Northwest River Partners, Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Stephen Daniel Mashuda, Todd D. True, Attorney, Earthjustice, Seattle, WA, Daniel John Rohlf, Counsel, Portland, OR, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

Carson Leonard Whitehead, Assistant Attorney General, Oregon Department of Justice, Salem, OR, for Intervenor-Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Richard Eitel, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Denver, CO, Coby Howell, Portland, OR, Romney Philpott, Ellen J. Durkee, Emily Anne Polachek, Attorneys, Environment & Natural Resources Division, Washington, DC, for Defendants-Appellants.

Beth S. Ginsberg, Jason T. Morgan, Attorney, Stoel Rives LLP, Seattle, WA, for Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant for NORTHWEST RIVER PARTNERS.

Clay R. Smith, Steven William Strack, Assistant Attorney Generals, AGID—Idaho Office of the Attorney General, Boise, ID, for Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant for STATE OF IDAHO.

Jeremiah D. Weiner, Assistant Attorney General, AGMT—Office of the Montana Attorney General (Helena), for Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant for STATE OF MONTANA.

William Kenneth Barquin, Kootenai Tribe (Portland Office), Legal Department, Attorney General, Julie A. Weis, Esquire, Attorney, Haglund Kelley LLP, Portland, OR, for Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant for KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO.

John Harrison, Esquire, Attorney, Stuart M. Levit, Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes, Legal Department, Pablo, MT, for Intervenor-Defendant-Appellant for CONFEDERATED SALISH AND KOOTENAI TRIBES.

David J. Cummings, Esquire, Attorney, OFFICE OF LEGAL COUNSEL NEZ PERCE, Geoffrey M. Whiting, Nez Perce Tribe, Office of Legal Counsel, Lapwai, ID, Amicus Curiae for NEZ PERCE TRIBE.

BEFORE: THOMAS, Chief Judge, and TASHIMA and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

THOMAS, Chief Judge:

These consolidated appeals are the latest round of a long-running dispute over salmon and steelhead species listed under the Endangered Species Act ("ESA"), 16 U.S.C. §§ 1531 - 1544. Three federal agencies (collectively, "federal defendants"), joined by intervenor-defendants, challenge injunctions issued by the district court to protect the listed species. At the request of the National Wildlife Federation and the State of Oregon (collectively, "plaintiffs"), the district court ordered the agencies to conduct certain spill operations and fish monitoring operations at dams and related facilities in the Federal Columbia River Power...

To continue reading

Request your trial
70 cases
  • E. Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Trump
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • November 19, 2018
    ...‘the requested injunction would forestall’ the irreparable harm qualifies as such a connection." Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv. , 886 F.3d 803, 819 (9th Cir. 2018) (quoting Perfect 10, Inc. v. Google, Inc. , 653 F.3d 976, 981-82 (9th Cir. 2011) ). But the plaintiff "ne......
  • Envtl. Def. Ctr. v. Bureau of Ocean Energy Mgmt.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • June 3, 2022
    ...species has been injured, the task of preserving that species becomes all the more difficult." Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv. , 886 F.3d 803, 818 (9th Cir. 2018) (citation omitted). Environmental injury, by its nature, "is often permanent or at least of long duration, ......
  • WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Serv.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Arizona
    • September 11, 2019
    ...a plaintiff must demonstrate that irreparable injury "is likely in the absence of an injunction." Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv. , 886 F.3d 803, 818 (9th Cir. 2018) (emphasis in original) (citing Winter , 555 U.S. at 22, 129 S.Ct. 365 ). There must be "a definitive thr......
  • W. Watersheds Project v. Bernhardt
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Oregon
    • July 16, 2019
    ..."Irreparable harm should be determined by reference to the purposes of the statute being enforced." Nat'l Wildlife Fed'n v. Nat'l Marine Fisheries Serv. , 886 F.3d 803, 818 (9th Cir. 2018). One purpose of the FLPMA is to protect ecological resources such as species, the purpose of the GSG-A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Ongoing Actions, Ongoing Issues: Trying Again to Free Federal Dams From the ESA
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter No. 49-11, November 2019
    • November 1, 2019
    ...618, 634-36 (8th Cir. 2005) (Corps’ operation of Missouri River reservoirs). 80. See Nat’l Wildlife Fed’n v. Nat’l Marine Fisheries Serv., 886 F.3d 803 (9th Cir. 2018). 81. See San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Auth. v. Jewell, 747 F.3d 581, 44 ELR 20056 (9th Cir. 2014). 82. One of the governm......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT