Nathaniel Lord, Plaintiff In Error v. John Veazie, Defendant
Citation | 12 L.Ed. 1067,8 How. 251,49 U.S. 251 |
Parties | NATHANIEL LORD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN W. VEAZIE, DEFENDANT |
Decision Date | 01 January 1850 |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial155 cases
-
Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc., No. 16-16486 & 16-16783
...(quoting Chicago & G.T. Ry. Co. v. Wellman , 143 U.S. 339, 345, 12 S.Ct. 400, 36 L.Ed. 176 (1892) ). See also Lord v. Veazie , 49 U.S. (8 How.) 251, 254, 12 L.Ed. 1067 (1850). "Concrete adverseness ... sharpens the presentation of issues upon which the court so largely depends[.]" Linda R.S......
-
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Constellium Rolled Prods. Ravenswood, LLC
...L.Ed. 246 (1911). That means "there must be an actual controversy, and adverse interests" between the parties. Lord v. Veazie , 49 U.S. (8 How.) 251, 255, 12 L.Ed. 1067 (1850). Although adverseness is an abstract concept that defies straightforward definition, typical adverseness is easy en......
-
O'DONNELL v. United States, 7522.
...they were not parties, recently, in 1849, had been considered by the Supreme Court in the leading case on that subject, Lord v. Veazie, 8 How. 251, 12 L. Ed. 1067. It was a decision of such importance that it must have been familiar to all the bar and to the Congress. In that case, on motio......
-
Johnson v. United States, Civ. No. F 74-111
...whether this is a feigned case. Cf. United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 302, 63 S.Ct. 1075, 87 L.Ed. 1413 (1943); Lord v. Veazie, 8 How. 251, 12 L.Ed. 1067 (1850). Had she filed a joint return, she would have incurred no injury vis-a-vis the head of household rates she now seeks to use and w......
Request a trial to view additional results