Nathaniel Lord, Plaintiff In Error v. John Veazie, Defendant

Citation12 L.Ed. 1067,8 How. 251,49 U.S. 251
PartiesNATHANIEL LORD, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. JOHN W. VEAZIE, DEFENDANT
Decision Date01 January 1850
CourtUnited States Supreme Court

To continue reading

Request your trial
155 cases
  • Muransky v. Godiva Chocolatier, Inc., No. 16-16486 & 16-16783
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (11th Circuit)
    • 28 Octubre 2020
    ...(quoting Chicago & G.T. Ry. Co. v. Wellman , 143 U.S. 339, 345, 12 S.Ct. 400, 36 L.Ed. 176 (1892) ). See also Lord v. Veazie , 49 U.S. (8 How.) 251, 254, 12 L.Ed. 1067 (1850). "Concrete adverseness ... sharpens the presentation of issues upon which the court so largely depends[.]" Linda R.S......
  • Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Constellium Rolled Prods. Ravenswood, LLC
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)
    • 5 Agosto 2022
    ...L.Ed. 246 (1911). That means "there must be an actual controversy, and adverse interests" between the parties. Lord v. Veazie , 49 U.S. (8 How.) 251, 255, 12 L.Ed. 1067 (1850). Although adverseness is an abstract concept that defies straightforward definition, typical adverseness is easy en......
  • O'DONNELL v. United States, 7522.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (9th Circuit)
    • 7 Junio 1937
    ...they were not parties, recently, in 1849, had been considered by the Supreme Court in the leading case on that subject, Lord v. Veazie, 8 How. 251, 12 L. Ed. 1067. It was a decision of such importance that it must have been familiar to all the bar and to the Congress. In that case, on motio......
  • Johnson v. United States, Civ. No. F 74-111
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 7th Circuit. United States District Court of Northern District of Indiana
    • 8 Noviembre 1976
    ...whether this is a feigned case. Cf. United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 302, 63 S.Ct. 1075, 87 L.Ed. 1413 (1943); Lord v. Veazie, 8 How. 251, 12 L.Ed. 1067 (1850). Had she filed a joint return, she would have incurred no injury vis-a-vis the head of household rates she now seeks to use and w......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT