National Cable Television Association, Inc v. United States 8212 948, No. 72

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtBLACKMUN
Citation39 L.Ed.2d 370,94 S.Ct. 1146,415 U.S. 336
Decision Date04 March 1974
Docket NumberNo. 72
PartiesNATIONAL CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES and Federal Communications Commission. —948

415 U.S. 336
94 S.Ct. 1146
39 L.Ed.2d 370
NATIONAL CABLE TELEVISION ASSOCIATION, INC., Petitioner,

v.

UNITED STATES and Federal Communications Commission.

No. 72—948.
Argued Dec. 3, 1973.
Decided March 4, 1974.

Syllabus

The Independent Offices Appropriation Act, 1952 (hereafter the Act), authorizes each federal agency to prescribe by regulation such fee for the agency's services as is determined to be fair and equitable, taking into consideration the direct and indirect 'cost to the Government, value to the recipient, public policy or interet served, and other pertinent facts . . ..' Pursuant to the Act, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), in revising fees imposed upon community antenna television (CATV) systems, first estimated its direct and indirect costs for CATV regulations, and then, while retaining filing fees, added an annual fee for each CATV system at the rate of 30¢ per subscriber, concluding that this fee would approximate the 'value to the recipient' used in the Act. The Court of Appeals, on a review obtained by petitioner, a CATV trade association, approved the FCC's action. Held:

1. The Act authorizes the imposition of a 'fee,' which connotes a 'benefit' of 'value to the recipient.' The latter phrase is the proper measure of the authorized charge, not the 'public policy or interest served' phraseology which, if read literally, would enable the agency to make assessments or tax levies whereby CATV's and other broadcasters would be paying not only for the benefits they received but, contrary to the Act's objectives, would also be paying for the protective services the FCC renders to the public. Pp. 340—343.

2. The FCC should reappraise the annual fee imposed upon the CATV's. It is not enough to figure the total cost (direct and indirect) to the FCC for operating a CATV supervision unit and then to contrive a formula reimbursing the FCC for that amount, since some of such costs certainly inured to the public's benefit and should not have been included in the fee imposed upon the CATV's. Pp. 343—344.

464 F.2d 1313, reversed and remanded.

Page 337

Stuart F. Feldstein, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Edward R. Korman, New York City, for respondents.

Jr. Justice DOUGLAS delivered the opinion of the Court.

The Independent Offices Appropriation Act, 1952, Tit. 5, 65 Stat. 290, 31 U.S.C. § 483a, provides in relevant part: 'It is the sense of the Congress that any work, service . . . benefit, . . . license, . . . or similar thing of value or utility performed, furnished, provided, granted . . . by any Federal agency . . . to or for any person (including . . . corporations . . .) . . . shall be self-sustaining to the full extent possible, and the head of each Federal agency is authorized by regulation . . . to prescribe therefor . . . such fee, charge, or price, if any, as he shall determine . . . to be fair and equitable taking into consideration direct and indirect cost to the Government, value to the recipient, public policy or interest served, and other pertinent facts . . ..'1 Petitioner is a trade association rep-

Page 338

resenting community antenna television (CATV) systems which transmit TV programs by cable. The Federal Communications Commission is authorized to regulate these CATV outlets, as the Court held in United States v. Southwestern Cable Co., 392 U.S. 157, 88 S.Ct. 1994, 20 L.Ed.2d 1001. The power to regulate, though not in the form of granting licenses,

Page 339

extends to the promulgation of regulations requiring the compulsory origination of programs by CATV. United States v. Midwest Video Corp., 406 U.S. 649, 92 S.Ct. 1860, 32 L.Ed.2d 390. These CATV's, however, are not under the exclusive oversight of the Commission. Local governments and even some States provide permits or franchises to CATV's, including rights of way for the cables used. Some communities in return for their permits require the CATV to pay an annual percentage fee as a gross receipts tax.2

The Commission in 1964 established only nominal filing fees that produced revenues which approximated 25% of the Commission's annual appropriation. See 21 F.C.C.2d 502, 503. See also Aeronautical Radio, Inc. v. United States, 7 Cir., 335 F.2d 304. The Bureau of the Budget urged higher fee schedules; and so did the committees of the Congress. See H.R.Rep.No.91—316, pp. 7—8, and H.R.Conf.Rep.No.91—649, p. 6, where it was stated:

'The committee of conference is agreed that the fee structure for the Commission should be adjusted to fully support all its activities so the taxpayers will not be required to bear any part of the load in view of the profits regulated by this agency.'

Page 340

The Commission, after notice and hearing, revised existing fees for licensees and for the first time imposed fees upon CATV's. It first estimated its direct and indirect costs for CATV regulation which were $1,145,400 or 4.6% of its total budget request for that year. Filing fees were retained; and there was added an annual fee for each cable television system at the rate of 30 cents for each subscriber. The Commission, finding that subscription rates clustered at about $5 a month, concluded that the 30-cent fee would typically amount to only about one-half of 1% of a CATV system's gross revenues from subscription. The fees would produce, it said, $1,145,000 annually, and it concluded that the 30-cent fee would approximate the 'value to the recipient' used in the Act, 23 F.C.C.2d 880; 28 F.C.C.2d 139.

Petitioner obtained review of the decision in the Court of Appeals, which approved the Commission's action, 464 F.2d 1313. The case is here on a petition for certiorari which we granted, 411 U.S. 981, 93 S.Ct. 2267, 36 L.Ed.2d 957, because of an apparent conflict between the decision in this case and the decision in New England Power Co. v. FPC, 151...

To continue reading

Request your trial
283 practice notes
  • Clark v. Valeo, No. 76-1825
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 6 Junio 1977
    ...discrete question: is any delegation of this sort valid, no matter what standards are employed? Cf. National Cable Ass'n v. United States, 415 U.S. 336, 94 S.Ct. 1146, 39 L.Ed.2d 370 (1974). Only if we could conceive of some valid delegation need we worry about the possibility that it can b......
  • US v. Smith, No. 87-CR-374.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Court of Colorado
    • 25 Marzo 1988
    ...such legislative action is not a forbidden delegation of legislative power. National Cable Television Association, Inc. v. United States, 415 U.S. 336, 342, 94 S.Ct. 1146, 1150, 39 L.Ed.2d 370 Here, the standards delineated by Congress are sufficient to justify the inference that the delega......
  • Am. Council of Life Insurers v. Dist. of Columbia Health Benefit Exch. Auth., Civil Action No. 14–cv–1138 BAH
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 13 Noviembre 2014
    ...).Significantly, the IOAA is interpreted “narrowly to avoid constitutional problems.” Nat'l Cable Television Ass'n v. United States, 415 U.S. 336, 342, 94 S.Ct. 1146, 39 L.Ed.2d 370 (1974) ; see also Fed. Power Comm'n v. New England Power Co., 415 U.S. 345, 94 S.Ct. 1151, 39 L.Ed.2d 383 (19......
  • U.S. v. Rohm and Haas Co., No. 92-1517
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • 22 Octubre 1993
    ...oversight costs incurred by EPA. In support of this proposition, they rely on National Cable Television Ass'n, Inc. v. United States, 415 U.S. 336, 342, 94 S.Ct. 1146, 1149-50, 39 L.Ed.2d 370 (1974), a case later interpreted by the Supreme Court as standing for the proposition that "Congres......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
278 cases
  • Clark v. Valeo, No. 76-1825
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • 6 Junio 1977
    ...discrete question: is any delegation of this sort valid, no matter what standards are employed? Cf. National Cable Ass'n v. United States, 415 U.S. 336, 94 S.Ct. 1146, 39 L.Ed.2d 370 (1974). Only if we could conceive of some valid delegation need we worry about the possibility that it can b......
  • US v. Smith, No. 87-CR-374.
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. 10th Circuit. United States District Court of Colorado
    • 25 Marzo 1988
    ...such legislative action is not a forbidden delegation of legislative power. National Cable Television Association, Inc. v. United States, 415 U.S. 336, 342, 94 S.Ct. 1146, 1150, 39 L.Ed.2d 370 Here, the standards delineated by Congress are sufficient to justify the inference that the delega......
  • Am. Council of Life Insurers v. Dist. of Columbia Health Benefit Exch. Auth., Civil Action No. 14–cv–1138 BAH
    • United States
    • United States District Courts. United States District Court (Columbia)
    • 13 Noviembre 2014
    ...).Significantly, the IOAA is interpreted “narrowly to avoid constitutional problems.” Nat'l Cable Television Ass'n v. United States, 415 U.S. 336, 342, 94 S.Ct. 1146, 39 L.Ed.2d 370 (1974) ; see also Fed. Power Comm'n v. New England Power Co., 415 U.S. 345, 94 S.Ct. 1151, 39 L.Ed.2d 383 (19......
  • U.S. v. Rohm and Haas Co., No. 92-1517
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (3rd Circuit)
    • 22 Octubre 1993
    ...oversight costs incurred by EPA. In support of this proposition, they rely on National Cable Television Ass'n, Inc. v. United States, 415 U.S. 336, 342, 94 S.Ct. 1146, 1149-50, 39 L.Ed.2d 370 (1974), a case later interpreted by the Supreme Court as standing for the proposition that "Co......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • New Wine in Old Bottles: Distorting the Antiquities Act to Aggrandize Executive Power
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter Nbr. 48-4, April 2018
    • 1 Abril 2018
    ...(1928); Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 373 (1989). 607, 448 U.S. 646 (1980); National Cable Television Assn. v. United States, 415 U.S. 336, 415 U.S. 342 (1974). 60 In other words, a statutory delegation will not be implied if it would risk unconstitutionality because of the abse......
  • EPA's Existing Authority to Impose a Carbon 'Tax
    • United States
    • Environmental Law Reporter Nbr. 49-10, October 2019
    • 1 Octubre 2019
    ...charges, but a charge may be redetermined under this section consistent with the prescribed bases. 20. Nat’l Cable Television Ass’n , 415 U.S. 336. 21. “No one who cannot rejoice in the discovery of his own mistakes deserves to be called a scholar.” Donald Foster, Quote of the Day , N.Y. Ti......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT