National Labor Relations Bd. v. Conover Motor Co., 4286-4288.

Decision Date05 November 1951
Docket NumberNo. 4286-4288.,4286-4288.
Citation192 F.2d 779
PartiesNATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CONOVER MOTOR CO. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. PHELPS BROS. SERVICE. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. STRANG GARAGE CO.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit

Owsley Vose, Washington, D. C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Norton J. Come, and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D. C., were with him on the brief), for petitioner.

Thomas M. Burgess, Colorado, Springs, Colo., for respondents.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

MURRAH, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to the usual statutory proceedings under Section 10 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947, 61 Stat. 136, 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq., the National Labor Relations Board found that the Conover Motor Company, the Phelps Brothers Service Company and the Strang Garage Company, have refused and are refusing to bargain collectively with the certified representatives of their employees in violation of Section 8, subsection (a) (1) and (5) of the Act; that such unfair labor practices affect commerce within the meaning of Section 2(6) and (7) of the Act, and entered the usual cease and desist orders. Each of the respondents has refused to comply on the grounds that its activities do not affect commerce, and the Board is therefore without jurisdiction.

The sole question on this petition for enforcement is whether the respondents, and each of them individually, as retail dealers of new automobiles, are engaged in a business affecting commerce within the meaning of the Act. Each respondent admits that if its business is subject to the Act, the International Association of Machinists is the appropriate statutory bargaining representative of their mechanics, mechanic helpers, apprentices, body mechanics, metal men, painters, trimmers, polishers and lubricators, and that their refusal to bargain with such representative constitutes an unfair labor practice under the Act.

The respondent, Conover Motor Company, sells services and repairs automobiles in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Its sales of new automobiles are made in accordance with an agreement with the Chrysler Corporation, giving Conover exclusive rights for the sale of Chryslers in El Paso County, Colorado, and nonexclusive rights for the sale of Plymouths.

During 1949, Conover purchased Chrysler automobiles at a total cost of $108,808.88, and Plymouth automobiles at a total cost of $140,991.35, all of which were shipped to it from outside the state of Colorado. During the same year it purchased directly from suppliers located outside Colorado, Chrysler and Plymouth parts totalling $6,731, and purchased from Colorado suppliers, parts manufactured outside the state, totalling $40,225.66. Conover's total receipts during the year 1949, all of which were derived from sales and services performed within the State of Colorado, amounted to $615,369.86.

Phelps Brothers Service Company, like Conover, sells, services and repairs automobiles in Colorado Springs. It operates under a dealer's franchise issued by the Nash-Kelvinator Corporation, with the exclusive right to sell Nash automobiles in El Paso County, Colorado. During 1949, Phelps purchased new Nash cars valued at $174,109.26; accessories attached thereto valued at $21,325.80 and Nash parts valued at $28,432.37. The new cars were ordered by Phelps through the manufacturer's zone office in Denver, but most of the orders were filled by shipment from Kenosha, Wisconsin. The parts, although obtained from the Nash Warehouse in Denver, were manufactured in Milwaukee, Wisconsin. During 1949, Phelps' total receipts, all derived from sales and services performed in Colorado, amounted to $416,423.34.

The Strang Garage Company operates a retail automobile agency and general garage and automobile repair business in Colorado Springs. It sells Buicks and GMC trucks under contracts with General Motors Corporation, giving it the exclusive right to sell GMC trucks and Buicks in El Paso County, Colorado, and nonexclusive rights to sell these vehicles in adjacent Teller County. In 1949, Strang ordered, through General Motor's Branch Office in Denver, new Buicks valued at $354,664.30. These new cars, although billed to the General Motors Acceptance Corporation, were shipped by the manufacturer from Kansas City, Missouri, and Flint, Michigan, directly to Strang's place of business. During the same period, Strang ordered from General Motors' Denver Office, GMC trucks valued at $44,111.80, which were delivered by transport to Strang from the manufacturer's factory at Pontiac, Michigan, or from the assembly plant at St. Louis, Missouri. Strang also purchased directly from suppliers located outside the State, car accessories valued at $41,502.64 and Buick parts valued at $19,786.00. In 1949 the total value of shipments to Strang from points...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Intern. Ass'n of Fire Fighters v. So. Johnson Cty.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kansas
    • June 2, 1998
    ...dispositive. "The incidence of the Labor Management Relations Act is not restricted to interstate transactions." NLRB v. Conover Motor Co., 192 F.2d 779, 781 (10th Cir.1951). Under the broad jurisdictional mandate set forth in Reliance Fuel, the court finds that defendant's operations have ......
  • National Labor Relations Board v. Bill Daniels, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit
    • March 17, 1953
    ...agreement into a vast national network of an integrated distribution system. In support of this conclusion it cited N. L. R. B. v. Conover Motor Co., 10 Cir., 192 F.2d 779 and N. L. R. B. v. Davis Motors, Inc., 10 Cir., 192 F.2d 782, both of which cases involved dealers who purchased all of......
  • NLRB v. Central Oklahoma Milk Producers Ass'n
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • December 9, 1960
    ...is whether a work stoppage at the Association would tend to impede the free flow of interstate commerce. N. L. R. B. v. Conover Motor Co., 10 Cir., 192 F.2d 779, and cases cited therein. The respondent is an association comprised entirely of Oklahoma farmers which is, inter alia, engaged in......
  • National Labor Relations Bd. v. PEERLESS QUARRIES, 4303.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Tenth Circuit
    • December 31, 1951
    ...1284; National Labor Relations Board v. Fainblatt, 306 U.S. 601, 307 U.S. 609, 59 S.Ct. 668, 83 L.Ed. 1014; National Labor Relations Board v. Conover Motor Co., 10 Cir., 192 F.2d 779; National Labor Relations Board v. Davis Motors, Inc., 10 Cir., 192 F.2d 782; National Labor Relations Board......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT