National Labor Relations Board v. Mid-Co Gasoline Co.
Decision Date | 17 July 1950 |
Docket Number | No. 12522.,12522. |
Citation | 183 F.2d 451 |
Parties | NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. MID-CO GASOLINE CO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., Elmer Davis, Chief Law Officer, Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner.
John M. Scott, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and WALLER, Circuit Judges.
Since, and pursuant to, the former opinion in this case,1 the correct answers to the several questions therein propounded have been stipulated, supplemental findings and conclusions have been made by the Board, and its jurisdiction has been reaffirmed by it. Its conclusions in part are:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
National Labor Rel. Bd. v. New York State Labor Rel. Bd.
...jurisdiction. See N. L. R. B. v. Bradford Dyeing Association, 310 U.S. 318, 326, 60 S.Ct. 918, 84 L.Ed. 1226; N. L. R. B. v. Mid-Co Gasoline Co., 5 Cir., 183 F.2d 451, 453. It, however, may be some indication that taxicab service to and from the terminals is merely incidental to interstate ......
-
Elsis v. Evans
...is plenary and extends to all such commerce be it great or small'. (Emphasis added.) As was said in National Labor Relations Board v. Mid-Co Gasoline Co., 5 Cir., 183 F.2d 451, 453, 'As we read the decisions which have construed the Act, we are constrained to the view that they hold that in......
-
National Labor Relations Bd. v. White Const. & Eng. Co.
...5 Cir., 193 F.2d 483; N. L. R. B. v. Denver Building & Trades Council, 341 U.S. 675, 71 S.Ct. 943, 95 L.Ed. 1284; N. L. R. B. v. Mid-Co Gasoline Co., 5 Cir., 183 F.2d 451. Respondent also objects to the election on the ground that the Board did not select an appropriate bargaining unit in w......
-
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Ray Smith Transport Co., 13612.
...with interstate commerce is too little to come within its cognizance". In other cases, and particularly in N. L. R. B. v. Mid-Co Gasoline Co., 5 Cir., 183 F.2d 451, we have reaffirmed this view. Upon the authority of those cases and the many others they cite, we reject Respondent's first Of......