National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance Mach Co, 188
| Decision Date | 16 February 1942 |
| Docket Number | No. 188,188 |
| Citation | 62 S.Ct. 608,315 U.S. 282,86 L.Ed. 848 |
| Parties | NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. AUTOMOTIVE MAINTENANCE MACH. CO |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
Messrs. Francis Biddle, Atty. Gen., and Ernest A. Gross, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Mr. John Harrington, of Chicago, Ill., for respondent.
Upon examination of the record, the Court concludes that the Board's findings are supported by substantial evidence. National Labor Relations Board v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584, 61 S.Ct. 358, 85 L.Ed. 368; Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Labor Board, 312 U.S. 660, 61 S.Ct. 736, 85 L.Ed. 1108. The judgment is therefore reversed with directions to enforce the Board's order in full, but with the modification proposed by the Board to conform to the decision in Republic Steel Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 7, 61 S.Ct. 77, 85 L.Ed. 6. The CHIEF JUSTICE and Mr. Justice ROBERTS are of opinion that the order as modified should be enforced except with respect to the alleged discriminatory discharges of Warner, Jr., and Jordan, which they think are without the support of substantial evidence.
Reversed, with directions.
Mr. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Virginia Electric Power Co v. National Labor Relations Board
...etc., v. National Labor Relations Board, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L.Ed. 50; National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance Machinery Co., 315 U.S. 282, 62 S.Ct. 608, 86 L.Ed. 848; National Labor Relations Board v. Nevada Consol. Copper Corp., 316 U.S. 105, 62 S.Ct. 960, 86 L.E......
-
Riley v. New York Trust Co
......, speaking generally, become a part of national jurisprudence, and therefore federal questions ......
-
National Labor Relations Board v. Electric Vacuum Cleaner Co
...the Board was fully justified in reaching its determination that nothing more was agreed. National Labor Relations Board v. Automotive Maintenance Mach. Co., 315 U.S. 282, 62 S.Ct. 608, 86 L.Ed. —-; National Labor Relations Board v. Falk Corp., 308 U.S. 453, 461, 60 S.Ct. 307, 311, 84 L.Ed.......
-
National Labor Rel. Bd. v. May Department Stores Co., 13094.
...Copper Corporation, 316 U.S. 105, 62 S.Ct. 960, 86 L.Ed. 1305, reversing 10 Cir., 122 F.2d 587; N.L.R.B. v. Automotive Maintenance Machinery Co., 315 U.S. 282, 62 S.Ct. 608, 86 L.Ed. 848, reversing 7 Cir., 116 F.2d 350; N.L.R.B. v. Link-Belt Co., 311 U.S. 584, 61 S.Ct. 358, 85 L.Ed. 368; an......