NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. School-Timer Frocks, 6981.
| Decision Date | 14 July 1955 |
| Docket Number | No. 6981.,6981. |
| Citation | 224 F.2d 336 |
| Parties | NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. SCHOOL-TIMER FROCKS, Inc., Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Alice Andrews, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., (Theophil C. Kammholz, General Counsel, Chicago, Ill., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D. C., on brief), for petitioner.
Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.
This is a petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board which directed respondent to cease and desist from certain unfair labor practices and to restore with back pay one Junelle Griffin, an employee whom it found to have been discriminatorily discharged on account of union membership and activities. The facts are fully stated in the report of the Trial Examiner and the decision of the Board and need not be repeated here. The issues involved are pure questions of fact and the findings of the Board with regard thereto cannot be said to be without substantial support in the record considered as a whole. The order of the Board will accordingly be enforced, as it is elementary that it is not the province of this court, in Labor Board cases, to weigh the evidence or to pass upon the credibility of the witnesses.
Order Enforced.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
NLRB v. Aerovox Corporation of Myrtle Beach, SC
...of credibility, tasks for which the Examiner and Board are well suited, and for which this court is not. NLRB v. School-Timer Frocks, Inc., 224 F.2d 336, 337 (4th Cir. 1955). Thus Aerovox's contention that the findings of the Board are not supported by substantial evidence is without merit.......
-
NLRB v. Lexington Chair Company
...to be determined by the Board, not by this court. E. g., NLRB v. Lester Bros., 301 F.2d 62, 68 (4th Cir. 1962); NLRB v. School-Timer Frocks, 224 F.2d 336, 337 (4th Cir. 1955). 5 The Company, at the hearing and in its brief, contended that the Trial Examiner violated the hearsay rule. The ob......
-
Wellington Mill Division, West Point Mfg. Co. v. NLRB
...Lester Bros., Inc., 301 F.2d 62 (4 Cir. 1962); N. L. R. B. v. Pugh & Barr, Inc., 231 F.2d 558 (4 Cir. 1956); N. L. R. B. v. School Timer Frocks, Inc., 224 F.2d 336 (4 Cir. 1955). Sound policy considerations buttress our disposition of these cases, quite apart from the deference due the tria......
-
NLRB v. United Brass Works, Inc.
...It is not the function of a Court of Appeals in Labor Board cases to pass upon the credibility of witnesses. N. L. R. B. v. School-Timer Frocks, Inc., 4 Cir., 1955, 224 F.2d 336. However, where material uncontradicted evidence has been ignored, N. L. R. B. v. Cleveland Trust Co., 6 Cir., 19......