NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. LOCAL 252, SHEET METAL WORKERS'INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, 23521.
| Decision Date | 21 July 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 23521.,23521. |
| Citation | 429 F.2d 1244 |
| Parties | NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. LOCAL 252, SHEET METAL WORKERS' INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AFL-CIO, Respondent. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Glen M. Bendixsen (argued), Atty. N.L.R.B., Roy O. Hoffman, Director, N. L.R.B., San Francisco, Cal., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Gen. Counsel for N.L.R.B., Elliott Moore, and Joseph A. Yablonski, Attys., for N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Victor J. Van Bourg (argued), of Levy, DeRoy, Geffner & Van Bourg, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.*
This case is before the court on the application of the National Labor Relations Board pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, for enforcement of its order issued against Local 252, Sheet Metal Workers' International Association.
The Board found that Local 252, by threatening and ultimately imposing fines and punishment on three of its members, Jessie Blassingame, Harold Crapson, and Rex Napier, for crossing a picket line manned by another union, induced or encouraged its members employed by Comfort Air Conditioning and Supply, Inc. to withhold their services with an object of forcing or requiring Comfort to cease doing business with S. L. Miller, Inc. in violation of Section 8 (b) (4) (i) (B) of the Act.
We have examined the record carefully and find that substantial evidence considered as a whole supports the Board's findings and conclusion.
It is ordered that a judgment be entered enforcing the Board's order in full.
* Honorable Wm. M. Byrne, United States Senior District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
N.L.R.B. v. Sequoia Dist. Council of Carpenters, AFL-CIO
...their services and exerted indirect pressure on the union's primary target. Such tactics are illegal. E. g., NLRB v. Local 252, Sheet Metal Workers, 429 F.2d 1244 (9th Cir. 1970). So, too, are threats to pull union workers from a job if the general contractor were to deal with a non-union s......
-
N.L.R.B. v. United Ass'n of Journeymen and Apprentices of Plumbing and Pipe-Fitting Industry of U.S. and Canada
...a secondary objective it constituted a section 8(b)(4) violation. Sheet Metal Workers Local 252, 166 N.L.R.B. 262 (1967), enf'd, 429 F.2d 1244 (9th Cir.1970). We are bound by that The Petition for Enforcement is GRANTED. ...