National Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n Inc., 355
Citation | 393 U.S. 18,89 S.Ct. 49 |
Decision Date | 14 October 1968 |
Docket Number | No. 355,355 |
Court | United States Supreme Court |
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
Facts and opinion, D.C., 268 F.Supp. 90.
Attorneys and Law Firms
Bryce Rea, Jr., and Thomas M. Knebel, for appellants.
Solicitor General Griswold, Assistant Attorney General Zimmerman, Robert W. Ginnane and Emmanuel H. Smith, for the United States and others.
James T. Johnson, for appellee Pacific Progress Shippers Ass'n, Inc.
Ronald N. Cobert and Philip R. Ehrenkranz, for appellee American Institute of Shippers' Ass'ns, Inc.
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State of SC ex rel. Patrick v. Block
...Freight Traffic Association, Inc. v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 90 (D.D.C.1967) (three judge court), aff'd per curiam, 393 U.S. 18, 89 S.Ct. 49, 21 L.Ed.2d 19 (1968); Seaboard World Airlines, Inc. v. Gronouski, 230 F.Supp. 44 (D.D.C.1964); Graham v. Lawrimore, 185 F.Supp. 761 (E.D.S.C.1960)......
-
Aiken v. Obledo
...858 (D.Del.1970); National Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 90 (D.D.C.1967), aff'd per curiam 393 U.S. 18, 89 S.Ct. 49, 21 L.Ed.2d 19 (1968). This exception to the exemption provided by 5 U.S.C. § 553(b)(A) is partly the result of the recognition ". . . the characte......
-
Associated Dry Goods Corp. v. EEOC
...in National Motor Freight Traffic Association v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 90 (D.D.C.1967), affirmed per curiam, 393 U.S. 18, 89 S.Ct. 49, 21 L.Ed.2d 19 (1968), where the court held that § 553 applied to an informal procedure established by the Interstate Commerce Commission for repayment ......
-
Lamoille Valley R. Co. v. I.C.C.
...National Motor Freight Traffic Ass'n v. United States, 268 F.Supp. 90, 96 (D.D.C.1967) (3-judge court), aff'd mem., 393 U.S. 18, 89 S.Ct. 49, 21 L.Ed.2d 19 (1968).75 See also Hall v. EEOC, 456 F.Supp. 695, 701-02 (N.D.Cal.1978); cf. Kessler v. FCC, 326 F.2d 673, 680-81 (D.C.Cir.1963) (tempo......