National Waterworks Co. v. Kansas City

Decision Date02 July 1894
Docket Number470.,469
Citation62 F. 853
PartiesNATIONAL WATERWORKS CO. v. KANSAS CITY. KANSAS CITY v. NATIONAL WATERWORKS CO.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

The contract sought to be enforced was created under an ordinance of the defendant city passed pursuant to provisions of an act of the general assembly of Missouri approved March 24, 1873 (Laws Mo. 1873, p. 286, Secs. 1, 22), as follows:

'Section 1. The city of Kansas is hereby empowered to construct water works, to take and convey into and throughout the city, for the use of the same and others therein, water of the Missouri river, Blue river or Kaw river, or all, from any point or points, and to that end to acquire, hold, use control and dispose of real estate and personal property within and without the corporate limits of the city, and also in the state of Kansas, necessary for laying pipes constructing reservoirs, aqueducts, appliances and means and erecting buildings and machinery proper and convenient for such water works, and for operating and repairing the same; to receive, take, purify, store, conduct and distribute in and throughout the city such water, and in general to do all things necessary and proper to carry this act into effect and accomplish the object thereof.'

'Sec. 22. The city of Kansas is hereby empowered to grant to any person or persons, or any corporation, the right to erect and operate such water works as the first section of this act provides for, and to accomplish the purpose therein mentioned on such terms and conditions as may be agreed on in a contract therefor: provided, that such grant shall only be made by or in all respects pursuant to ordinance, which shall not be valid till the same be approved by two-thirds of the qualified electors of the city voting on the matter at a general election, or special election ordered and held for the purpose, when the matter of the approval of such ordinance shall be submitted to such electors; the power to order, hold and declare the result of any election requisite being hereby conferred on the city, to be exercised by or pursuant to ordinance; and, provided further, that no grant so made shall confer the right to operate the water works for any period beyond twenty years from the time of approval of the ordinance as aforesaid; but the grant may be renewed by or pursuant to ordinance, approved as aforesaid, during the last of such twenty years, for another term not exceeding twenty years, on terms and conditions specified in the ordinance for the renewal of the grant; and, provided further, that in making such grant or renewing the same, the city shall reserve to itself the right, at its option, and at any time, to acquire and become sole owner of such water works, including all extensions and enlargements thereof, and everything of every nature and description belonging and pertaining thereto, on such terms as may be provided an agreed on between the parties at the time the grant is made; or if no right is expressly reserved, or the city cannot, according to any reservation, purchase and become sole owner as aforesaid, then the city may, at any time, at its option, acquire and become sole owner of such water works, including all enlargements and extensions thereof, and everything of every nature and description belonging or pertaining thereto, on paying therefore, the fair and equitable value thereof, to be ascertained, if the parties cannot agree thereon, by the circuit court of said county, on the petition of the city; the property and subject of purchase to be transferred and belong to the city on payment therefor; and provided further, that at the expiration of the twenty years, if the grant be not renewed, the city shall purchase and become sole owner of such water works as aforesaid, and pay therefor a price agreed upon by the parties or ascertained as they may agree, or, if the price cannot be thus fixed, then the city shall pay the fair and equitable value of the whole works, to be ascertained by said court on the petition of either party filed for the purpose; and, provided further, that the city may furnish any party to whom such grant may be made real estate and right of way for use in constructing and operating such water works, according to such agreements as may be made in the premises, and guarantee that the works shall earn a certain amount annually, to be specified in the grant, and guarantee, clear, over and above current expenses, taxes and assessments; and may secure by a proper deed or agreement for the purpose, to the party to whom such grant is made, the control and possession of any real estate and right of any (way) condemned or acquired in the exercise of the right of eminent domain, for use during the time such party may need the same under any such grant.'

Under authority granted by this law, the city, by an ordinance approved October 27, 1873, and ratified by a vote of the people on November 15, 1873, and taking effect on the latter date, granted to the National Waterworks Company a right to erect and operate waterworks. The ordinance contained the following provisions:

'Section 1. That the National Water Works Company of New York, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the state of New York, be and it is hereby authorized, subject to the limitations hereinafter or by law provided, to establish, construct, maintain and operate water works, in or adjacent to the city of Kansas, in the state of Missouri, to receive, take, purify, store, conduct, and distribute in and throughout the said city of Kansas, pure, well-settled, and wholesome water; to lay down pipes and extend aqueducts and conductors through the streets, avenues, lanes, alleys or public grounds of the said city of Kansas; to erect and maintain all necessary buildings, machinery and attachments, of any description, necessary and proper and suitable for such works, and to supply to said city and the inhabitants thereof such water by said water works. * * * The rights hereby granted to continue for twenty years from the date of the approval of this ordinance by a vote of the qualified voters of the city of Kansas. * * *
'Sec. 4. The city of Kansas hereby reserved to itself the right at its option, and at any time, to acquire and become sole owner of said water works, including all extensions and enlargements thereof and everything of every nature and description belonging and pertaining thereto, on paying therefor the fair and equitable value thereof, to be ascertained, if the parties cannot agree thereon, by the circuit court, or other court of record of the county of Jackson, at Kansas City, upon the petition of the city, and in such manner as the court may determine; provided, that a copy of such petition shall be served upon said company, at least fifteen days before the same shall be presented to said court. If, at the expiration of twenty years from the time this grant shall take effect the same shall not have been renewed, or the city shall not have become owner of said works, the city shall then be required to purchase and become sole owner of said water works as aforesaid, and pay therefor a price agreed upon by the parties, or ascertained as they may agree; or, if the price cannot be thus agreed upon, then the city shall pay the fair and equitable value of the whole works, to be ascertained by said circuit or other court of record as aforesaid, in such manner as said court shall determine on the petition of either party for the purpose; provided, that the party presenting such petition shall have served a copy thereof upon the other party, at least fifteen days before the day of presentation; and, provided also, that if upon examination it be found that such works are not in all respects in good condition, and of first-class and sound materials, and in every way efficient, then the city shall not be required to purchase the same at any time nor at any price.'

The company's bill, filed December 26, 1891, recited said act and ordinance, and alleged that under the contract thereby created the company completed the works for operation as required, and that they were duly accepted by the city; that the city adopted another ordinance in February, 1877, whereby certain litigation between it and the company was settled and certain changes were made in the original ordinance; that on the 25th day of May, 1878, the city, by a certificate signed by its mayor and the president of the common council, did certify that said company was operating its works to the satisfaction of the city; that the city adopted another ordinance in August, 1861, whereby the contract was further changed; that the company had kept and performed all the conditions, covenants, premises, and agreements on its part, and that it would at all times be ready, able, and willing to do so; that the company had expended large sums of money in building the works; and that in order to do so it has issued its bonds in the aggregate of $3,000,000, secured by mortgages covering the waterworks plant; that the ordinances aforesaid, and contrary to equity and good conscience, and with the intent and purpose to wreck the company's said waterworks in said city, to destroy the value thereof, and to render valueless to the bondholders of said bonds the security therefor mentioned in the mortgages referred to, and to impair the obligations of said city under said several contracts so entered into by it as aforesaid, and that with this intent and purpose, the said city falsely pretended that the ordinances aforesaid and the contract embodied therein, were not in force, and were no longer binding and obligatory upon said defendant, and particularly that said defendant was not and would not be bound either to purchase said...

To continue reading

Request your trial
64 cases
  • Spring Val. Water Co. v. City and County of San Francisco
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of California
    • October 7, 1908
    ... ... * * otherwise than as so established, shall forfeit' its ... 'franchise and waterworks * * * to the city and county * ... * * for the public use.' ... The ... water rates so ... Farmers' L. & T. Co., 154 U.S ... 362, 399, 14 Sup.Ct. 1047, 38 L.Ed. 1014; Cotting v. Kansas ... City Stockyards Co., 183 U.S. 79, 87, 22 Sup.Ct. 30, 46 L.Ed ... 92; Cons. Gas Co. v. New ... the rule stated as follows, in San Diego Land Co. v ... National City, 174 U.S. 739, 757, 19 Sup.Ct. 804, 43 ... L.Ed. 1154, has been uniformly approved: ... ...
  • Murray v. Public Utilities Commission
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • July 1, 1915
    ... ... valid, existing franchise to operate his utility in the city ... of Pocatello, and that the commission did not err in refusing ... to ... ( Munn v. Illinois, 94 U.S ... 113, 24 L.Ed. 77; State v. Kansas City R. R. Co., 32 ... F. 722; North Carolina Corp. Commission v ... 371, 59 A. 537, 539; ... Spring Valley Waterworks Co. v. San Francisco, 192 ... F. 137; National Waterworks Co. v. Kansas ... ...
  • City of Pocatello v. Murray
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • January 18, 1912
    ... ... States by a municipal corporation against M., who was ... maintaining and operating a waterworks system within the ... municipality, praying that the court "fix and promulgate ... reasonable ... compensation. ( San Diego etc. Co. v. National City, ... 74 F. 79, 174 U.S. 739, 19 S.Ct. 804, 43 L.Ed. 1154; ... Palatka Waterworks v. City ... 1907." (Pocatello v. Murray, 173 F. 382; National ... Waterworks Co. v. Kansas City, 62 F. 853, 10 C. C. A ... 653, 27 L. R. A. 827; Santa Ana Water Co. v. San ... ...
  • Cardle v. Indianapolis Water Co 16 19, 1926
    • United States
    • U.S. Supreme Court
    • November 22, 1926
    ...Denver v. Denver Union Water Co., 246 U. S. 178, 191, 192, 38 S. Ct. 278, 62 L. Ed. 649. And see National Waterworks Co. v. Kansas City, 62 F. 853, 865, 10 C. C. A. 653, 27 L. R. A. 827; Omaha v. Omaha Water Co., 218 U. S. 180, 202, 203, 30 S. Ct. 615, 54 L. Ed. 991, 48 L. R. A. (N. S.) 108......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT