Nautilus Ins. Co. v. RMB Enters., Inc.
| Court | U.S. District Court — District of Hawaii |
| Writing for the Court | Jill A. Otake, United States District Judge |
| Citation | Nautilus Ins. Co. v. RMB Enters., Inc., 497 F.Supp.3d 936 (D. Haw. 2020) |
| Decision Date | 28 October 2020 |
| Docket Number | CIVIL NO. 19-00496 JAO-RT |
| Parties | NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. RMB ENTERPRISES, INC. dba Paradise Pacific Homes, Defendant, and Charles M. Somers, Individually, Charles M. Somers as Trustee of the Charles M. Somers Living Trust and West Sunset 32 Phase 1, LLC, Intervenor Defendants. |
J. Patrick Gallagher, Kamalolookalani K. Koanui-Kong, Gallagher Kane Amai & Reyes, Honolulu, HI, for Plaintiff.
Forest Benjamin Jenkins, Lennes N. Omuro, Goodsill Anderson Quinn & Stifel LLP, Honolulu, HI, for Intervenor Defendants.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF NAUTILUS INSURANCE COMPANY'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
In this insurance declaratory action, Plaintiff Nautilus Insurance Company ("Plaintiff") seeks a determination that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Defendant RMB Enterprises, Inc. dba Paradise Pacific Homes ("Defendant") in an underlying action in the Circuit Court of the Fifth Circuit, State of Hawai'i, Charles Somers, et al. v. RMB Enterprises, Inc. , Civil No. 18-1-0169 (JRV) ("underlying action"). Plaintiff requests summary judgment on the basis that it has no duty to defend or indemnify Defendant. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Motion.
Charles M. Somers ("Somers"), individually, and Charles M. Somers as Trustee of the Charles M. Somers Living Trust, and West Sunset 32 Phase 1, LLC (collectively, "Intervenors") have an ownership interest in Kilauea Falls Ranch (the "Property") located on the island of Kaua‘i, Hawai'i. ECF No. 36-2 ¶ 6. Intervenors entered into a contract with Defendant on January 28, 2011 for the development and construction of the Property, which includes residential structures and a pond. Id. ¶ 8. The pond walls enclose residential spaces and "are steel-reinforced, cast-in-place (C.I.P) concrete walls that also serve as structural foundations for walls enclosing the Main Foyer, Foyer Stairway, Kitchen, Dining Room, Living Room, Theatre, Master Bedroom Foyer, Master Bedroom Closet, and Bedroom 4." ECF No. 48-1 ¶ 4. Defendant built the Property from 2011 to 2013.1 ECF No. 36-2 ¶ 17.
In February 2017, the pond leaked into its pump room and Defendant performed remedial work by injecting epoxy into cracks. Id. ¶ 19; ECF No. 48-1 ¶ 10. On June 3, 2017, water from the pond leaked into the interior of the residence near a staircase. ECF No. 36-2 ¶ 20. Water also leaked into the master bedroom area causing musty odor, mold growth, and increased humidity. Id. ¶ 21. Intervenors have incurred substantial expenses investigating the sources of the leaks and discovered water proofing issues and the use of untreated lumber in violation of the building code. Id. ¶¶ 22–25. Additional leaks appeared in December 2017 in the pump room and at the base of an exterior wall between the main residence and the pump room. Id. ¶¶ 26–27.
Intervenors filed the underlying action on November 14, 2018, asserting breach of contract, breach of warranty, misrepresentation, and negligence claims. Id. ¶¶ 29–45. They pray for compensatory, special, and/or general damages, pre- and post-judgment interest, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. Id. at 10.
Following the commencement of the underlying action, Plaintiff issued a reservation of rights letter to Defendant, reserving the right to disclaim coverage and to file a declaratory action regarding its rights and obligations.2 ECF No. 36-12 at 2, 16. To date, Plaintiff has defended Defendant in the underlying action pursuant to its reservation of rights and duty to defend under the applicable Commercial General Liability ("CGL") insurance policies (the "Policies"). Compl. ¶ 21.
Plaintiff issued consecutive CGL policies to Defendant for the period March 25, 2010 to March 25, 2011, and extending through the period March 25, 2017 to March 25, 2018. Id. ¶ 22. Section I of the Policies contains coverage and exclusion provisions:
ECF No. 36-15 at 12–13, 16. Section V contains the relevant definitions:
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
W. Am. Ins. Co. v. Del Ray Props., Inc.
...of the same parties, and implicating an area of law (insurance) regulated by the states, see, e.g., Nautilus Ins. Co. v. RMB Enterprises, Inc., 497 F. Supp. 3d 936, 949-51 (D. Haw. 2020), the Court finds that exercising jurisdiction over Plaintiffs' request for a declaration is appropriate ......