NCNB Texas Nat. Bank, N.A. v. West
Decision Date | 08 October 1993 |
Citation | 631 So.2d 212 |
Parties | NCNB TEXAS NATIONAL BANK, N.A., now known as NationsBank of Texas, N.A., et al. v. Neva Watkins WEST, et al. NCNB TEXAS NATIONAL BANK, N.A., now known as NationsBank of Texas, N.A., et al. v. Neva Watkins WEST, et al. 1920549, 1920550. |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Victor T. Hudson and William W. Watts III of Reams, Philips, Brooks, Schell, Gaston & Hudson, P.C., Mobile, and Randy J. McClanahan, Houston, TX, for appellant.
Conrad P. Armbrecht, Edward A. Dean and Duane A. Graham of Armbrecht, Jackson, DeMouy, Crowe, Holmes & Reeves, Mobile, for appellee.
This opinion addresses two appeals presenting the same issue of first impression.
These appeals involve two consolidated actions to quiet title to coalbed methane gas in, on, and under, land in Tuscaloosa County. The land was subject to 1953 and 1954 deeds from Phil Davant that conveyed his interest in coal and coal mining rights to Center Coal Company ("Center Coal") and reserved his interest in all gas. 1 The issue is whether a deed conveying all the coal and connected mining rights owned by the grantor, but specifically reserving the grantor's rights to all of the gas on the property, also reserves to the grantor all of the coalbed methane gas. 2 The resolution of this issue answers the question indirectly raised but not answered in Vines v. McKenzie Methane Corp., 619 So.2d 1305 (Ala.1993), that is, What is necessary for a grantor to convey separate estates in coal and coalbed methane gas?
The appellants in this case are the owners of a 22 1/2% interest in all gas reserved by the deed in question. The appellees are owners/lessees of the coal rights conveyed by the deed. The appellant gas owners' interests are represented in this case by a trust administered by NCNB Texas National Bank, N.A. ("NCNB"). For the sake of clarity, the appellants will hereinafter be referred to as the "gas owners" or as "NCNB," and the appellees will be referred to as the "coal owners."
On February 6, 1991, appellees Neva Watkins West, Wesley West Cattle Company, Jim Walter Resources, Inc. ("Jim Walter"), United Land Corporation, and Sonat Coal Gas, Inc., sued appellant NCNB Texas National Bank, N.A., now known as NationsBank of Texas, N.A. ("NCNB"), as trustee under the trust created by the last will and testament of Hortense E. Davant, seeking to quiet their title to coalbed methane gas in, on, and under, 40 acres of land in Tuscaloosa County. 3 NCNB counterclaimed, seeking to quiet its title to an undivided 22 1/2% interest in all gas, including coalbed methane gas, contained within the lands described in the February 27, 1953, deed from Phil Davant to Center Coal Company; these lands (the "Property") include the 40 acres at issue in the original complaint. Because some of the appellee coal owners had been producing and marketing coalbed methane gas from the Property, the counterclaim sought declaratory relief, damages for conversion, and an accounting as to the proceeds from the sale of NCNB's alleged interest in the gas already produced from the Property by certain counterclaim defendants.
NCNB moved on behalf of the appellant gas owners to consolidate with this action an action that it had filed against Center Coal Company, Ltd., Black Warrior Methane Corporation, Black Warrior Transmission Corporation, Southern Natural Gas Company, and certain trusts, all of which were involved in production and marketing of coalbed methane gas from the Property. The trial court granted the motion to consolidate and severed certain claims against Black Warrior Transmission Corporation, Southern Natural Gas Company, and Center Coal Company for a separate trial.
In response to a special interrogatory at the conclusion of the consolidated trial on September 24, 1992, the jury determined that all of the gas produced from the Property was coalbed gas and that none of the gas resided in non-coal strata before disturbance of the coal. 4 The jury returned a verdict in favor of appellees Black Warrior Methane Corporation and Sonat Coal Gas, Inc., on NCNB's claims for damages for the alleged production and sale of gas other than coalbed methane gas. The trial court then addressed the legal issue of the ownership of the coalbed methane gas in a final order and judgment entered December 31, 1992, which reads in part:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Co.
...The majority of other states addressing the issue have also held that ownership of CBM is in the coal owner. See NCNB Texas Nat'l Bank, N.A. v. West, 631 So.2d 212 (Ala.1993) (coal owner owns CBM contained in coal, and gas owner owns CBM which has migrated away from the coal reservoir); Vin......
-
Southern Ute Indian Tribe v. Amoco Production Co., 94-1579
...have little to offer in terms of our interpretation of Congressional intent in the 1909 and 1910 Acts. See, e.g., NCNB Texas Nat'l Bank, N.A. v. West, 631 So.2d 212 (Ala.1993) (coal owner has ownership rights of CBM contained in coal and gas owner had rights to any CBM which has migrated aw......
-
Energy Development Corp. v. Moss
...and practice at the time of the conveyance. The Supreme Court of Alabama has also considered this issue. In NCNB Texas National Bank, N.A. v. West, 631 So.2d 212 (Ala.1993), the Alabama Court also considered the difference between the rule of capture (which it described as a "nonownership t......
-
McGuffie v. Mead Corp.
...word ‘all,’ the word ‘future’ is unambiguous.” (alteration supplied) (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Texas National Bank, N.A. v. West, 631 So.2d 212, 222 (Ala.1993))). The category of entities that constitute former parents and stockholders of CAPCO is necessarily limited, and ......
-
CHAPTER 1 THE COMMON LAW OF ACCESS AND SURFACE USE IN MINING
...a declaration that they owned all of the uranium, a mineral located within the surface estate.) NCNB Texas Nat. Bank, N.A. v. West, 631 So.2d 212 (Ala., 1993) (Conveyance of coal as distinct property includes that bundle of property rights included within coal, such as rights incident and n......
-
CHAPTER 3 TITLE ISSUES: BEYOND AMOCO v. SOUTHERN UTE
...v. Hubbard, 623 So. 2d 1079 (Ala. 1993). Mineral owner less coal [Definitions] Hybrid - 3 Cases: 1. NCNB Texas Nat'l Bank. v. West, 631 So. 2d 212 (Ala. 1993) [Intent & Production Method] 2. In re: Hillsborough Holdings Corp., 207 B.R. 299 (Bankr. M.D. Fla. 1997) [Production Method] 3. Ratl......
-
CHAPTER 12 LAND TITLE ISSUES RELATED TO THE ACQUISITION AND DEVELOPMENT OF COAL ASSETS
...Min. L. Inst. Chapter 19. [115] United States Steel Corp. v. Hoge 468 A.2d 1380 (Pa. 1983) [116] NCNB Texas National Bank, N.A. v. West 631 So.2d 212 (Ala. 1993); Carbon County v. Union Reserve Coal Co. Inc. 271 Mont. 459, 898 P.2d 680 (Mont. 1995); also see §s82-1-111 MCA and §1-4-110 MCA ......
-
The rule of capture - an oil and gas perspective.
...different vernacular intent than the parties had regarding the 1904-07 Alberta deeds! (263) Anderson, [2004] S.C.R. [paragraph] 40. (264) 631 So. 2d 212 (Ala. (265) For other cases dealing with the issue of who owns the coalbed methane based on deeds that do not specifically mention that te......