Neal v. State, No. 2D14–1997.

• Court: Court of Appeal of Florida (US)
• Writing for the Court: PER CURIAM.
• Citation: 156 So.3d 1093 (Table)
• Parties: Antonio Maurice NEAL, Appellant, v. STATE Of Florida, Appellee.
• Decision Date: 10 October 2014
• Docket Number: No. 2D14–1997.

156 So.3d 1093 (Table)

Antonio Maurice NEAL, Appellant
v.
STATE Of Florida, Appellee.

No. 2D14–1997.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Oct. 10, 2014.

Antonio Maurice Neal, pro se.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Thomas, 487 So.2d 1043 (Fla.1986) ; Guilford v. State, 88 So.3d 998 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012) ; Scott v. State, 42 So.3d 923 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) ; Boyd v. State, 880 So.2d 726 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004) ; Cole v. State, 716 So.2d 325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) ; Jones v. Crosby, 857 So.2d 972 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) ; O'Bryant v. State, 765 So.2d 745 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) ; Gamble v. State, 723 So.2d 905 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) ; Fraley v. State, 641 So.2d 128 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994) ; Newton v. State, 603 So.2d 558 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992).

KHOUZAM, MORRIS, and SLEET, JJ., Concur.