Neale v. Goldberg

Decision Date03 November 1975
Docket NumberNo. 74--1567,74--1567
Citation525 F.2d 332
PartiesBettie NEALE, Appellant, v. Frank GOLDBERG and Earl M. Robins, Appellees.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
OPINION

Before BROWNING and ELY, Circuit Judges, and SHARP, District Judge. *

PER CURIAM:

We have concluded that the District Court's summary judgment must be affirmed because the prior state court proceedings were res judicata as to all issues presented by the complaint in the District Court. Francisco Enterprises, Inc. v. Kirby, 482 F.2d 481 (9th Cir. 1973). Appellant argues that the state court granted a declaratory judgment and that, under California law, a declaratory judgment is not res judicata as to subsequent proceedings. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1738, which requires federal courts to give state judgments the 'same full faith and credit' the judgments would be given in the jurisdiction of their rendition, this court is obliged to apply California's law of res judicata. See 88 Harv.L.Rev. 453, 455--56 & n.16 (1974). And the California court's ruling cannot accurately be characterized as merely a declaratory judgment. The dispute had 'crystallized into a cause of action for past wrongs,' Travers v. Louden, 254 Cal.App.2d 926, 62 Cal.Rptr. 654, 656 (1967), and the state court's judgment provided for relief in addition to a simple declaration of the rights of the parties.

Affirmed.

* Honorable Morell E. Sharp, United States District Judge, District of Western Washington, sitting by designation.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • U.S. v. Imperial Irr. Dist.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • August 18, 1977
    ...are bound to give the Hewes judgment the "same full faith and credit" it would be given by the courts of California. Neale v. Goldberg, 525 F.2d 332 (9th Cir. 1975). The determination of the Hewes court that acreage limitations did not apply in the Imperial Irrigation District was not a det......
  • Abramson v. University of Hawaii
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • March 28, 1979
    ...court adjudications. Red Fox v. Red Fox,564 F.2d 361, 364 (9th Cir. 1977). See Expert Electric, Inc. v. Levine,supra; Neale v. Goldberg, 525 F.2d 332 (9th Cir. 1975). 3 Res judicata rests on the public policy favoring an end to mere contentious litigation. Stevenson v. International Paper C......
  • Snow v. Nevada Dept. of Prisons
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Nevada
    • June 28, 1982
    ...collateral estoppel effect as Nevada would. See Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp., supra, at ___, 102 S.Ct. at 1898; Neale v. Goldberg, 525 F.2d 332 (9th Cir. 1975). Unfortunately, research has uncovered no decision of the Nevada Supreme Court applying the doctrines to an administrative......
  • Heath v. Cleary
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • June 17, 1983
    ...of the state in question. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1738 (1976); Miofsky v. Superior Court, 703 F.2d 332, 336 (9th Cir.1983); Neale v. Goldberg, 525 F.2d 332, 332 (9th Cir.1975); Winters v. Lavine, 574 F.2d 46, 54 (2d California follows the general rule that a party is collaterally estopped from r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT