NEC America, Inc. v. U.S.
| Decision Date | 08 May 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. 85-708,85-708 |
| Citation | 760 F.2d 1295 |
| Parties | , 3 Fed. Cir. (T) 148 NEC AMERICA, INC., Appellants, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee. Appeal |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit |
Appealed from: U.S. Court of International Trade; Chief Judge Re.
Edward N. Glad, Glad & Ferguson, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Michael P. Maxwell, Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, New York City, for appellee. With him on brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director, Washington, D.C., and Joseph I. Liebman, Attorney in Charge, International Trade Field Office, New York City.
Before BALDWIN, KASHIWA, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
This is an appeal from a judgment of the United States Court of International Trade sustaining the classification of certain display pagers under item 685.24 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States.
The issues presented in this case were thoroughly treated in the trial court's opinion filed by Chief Judge Re, reported at 8 CIT ----, 596 F.Supp. 466 (1984). Accordingly, we affirm on the basis of Chief Judge Re's opinion.
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Avecia, Inc. v. U.S., Slip Op. 06-184. Court No. 05-00183.
...all forms of the named article. See, e.g., NEC America, Inc. v. United States, 8 CIT 184, 186, 596 F.Supp. 466, 468 (1984), aff'd, 760 F.2d 1295 (Fed.Cir.1985). Avecia argues heading 3215 must be eo nomine since it does not specify inks "for use in printing" but simply identifies "printing ......
-
IN RE DEPT. OF ENERGY STRIPPER WELL EXEMPTION LIT.
... ... Steven Mahoney and Peter J. Turner, ARCO Alaska, Inc., Anchorage, Alaska, Robert E. Jordan, III, Samuel T. Perkins and Alfred M. Mamlet, Steptoe and ... Moreover, we must consider "the nature of the issue that is presented to us and not the nature of the case or controversy presented below." MGPC, 673 F.2d at 1281, quoted ... United Mine Workers of America, 330 U.S. 258, 290-92, 67 S.Ct. 677, 694-95, 91 L.Ed. 884, 910-12 (1947)). If its jurisdiction is ... ...
-
Permagrain Products, Inc. v. United States
...if it is supported by technical sources. See NEC America, Inc. v. United States, 8 CIT ___, 596 F.Supp. 466, 471, aff'd, 760 F.2d 1295 (Fed.Cir.1985). In this case the "technical" source relied upon by the plaintiff's expert has been shown to be of limited relevance to the industry meaning ......
-
A & A INTERN., INC. v. US
...v. United States, 9 CIT 69, 73 (1985); NEC America, Inc. v. United States, 8 CIT 184, 186, 596 F.Supp. 466, 468 (1984), aff'd, 760 F.2d 1295 (Fed.Cir.1985); Nootka Packing Co. v. United States, 22 CCPA 464, 470, T.D. 47464 (1935). The legislative history cannot be said to offer specific gui......