Neely v. United States, 11369.
Decision Date | 30 October 1945 |
Docket Number | No. 11369.,11369. |
Citation | 151 F.2d 533 |
Parties | NEELY v. UNITED STATES. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
George Rogers, of Birmingham, Ala., for appellant.
Jim C. Smith, U. S. Atty., of Birmingham, Ala., for appellee.
Before SIBLEY and McCORD, Circuit Judges, and KENNAMER, District Judge.
The conditions of probation included one that the probationer should not violate any law, local, State or national. On a motion to revoke the probation the evidence of the officers made a case, by circumstances, showing one or more violations of the liquor laws. The probationer, supported by his wife, denied the truth of this evidence. The issue was for the decision of the judge, who believed the officers. No error appears. Roberts v. United States, 320 U.S. 264, 64 S.Ct. 113, 88 L.Ed. 41; Burns v. United States, 287 U.S. 216, 53 S.Ct. 154, 77 L.Ed. 266.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Robinson
...supra; Manning v. U. S., supra; Slayton v. Com., supra; Murphy v. Lawhon, supra; Pritchett v. U. S., 4 Cir., 67 F.2d 244; Neely v. U. S., 5 Cir., 151 F.2d 533; Spears v. State, 194 Ark. 836, 109 S.W.2d In determining whether the evidence warrants the revocation of a suspended sentence, the ......
-
Slayton v. Commonwealth
...the evaluation and weight of their testimony, are for the court. Pritch-ett v. United States, 4 Cir., 67 F.2d 244, 245; Neely v. United States, 5 Cir., 151 F. 2d 533; State v. Marsh, 225 N.C. 648, 36 S.E.2d 244, 245; Calloway v. State, 201 Ark. 542, 145 S.W.2d 353, 354. To put the matter an......
-
United States v. Markovich
...law has been violated, and conviction is not a prerequisite, Kirsch v. United States, 173 F.2d 652, 654 (8 Cir. 1949); Neely v. United States, 151 F.2d 533 (5 Cir. 1945); Jianole v. United States, 58 F.2d 115, 117-118 (8 Cir. 1932); Riggs v. United States, 14 F.2d 5, 10 (4 Cir.), cert. deni......