O'Neil v. Lake Superior Iron Co.
Decision Date | 17 November 1886 |
Citation | 30 N.W. 688,63 Mich. 690 |
Parties | O'NEIL v. LAKE SUPERIOR IRON CO. |
Court | Michigan Supreme Court |
Error to circuit court, Marquette county.
F.O. Clark, for plaintiff and appellant.
Hayden & Young, for defendant.
This action was brought by the plaintiff against the defendant to recover damages for an injury received by him while working in the defendant's mine, and which he claims was caused through the negligence of the defendant. The defense was the general issue, under which the defendant introduced in evidence a written release and discharge of defendant, signed by the plaintiff, releasing and discharging defendant from all liability or claims for damages which he might have against it on account of disability received by plaintiff while in its employ, on the ninth day of February 1885, which was the injury complained of; and all claims for damages, whether from the negligence of the defendant, its officers, agents, or servants, or otherwise. The court instructed the jury that this release was a bar to plaintiff's right to recover, whether he had made out a case against defendant or not.
It appeared in evidence that the Lake Superior Iron Company, six or seven years ago, organized what was called a "club," to which the miners pay 30 cents a month and the company pays an equal amount, making 60 cents a man. The scheme was printed in large posters, and posted up in conspicuous places upon the premises where men were employed and was as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sanford v. Royal Ins. Co.
...credit for the money paid at the time the release, so-called, was executed. Railroad v. Doyle, supra; O'Brien v. Railway Co. supra; O'Neil v. Iron Co., supra. In Sheanon Insurance Co., supra, it is said that: "The $450 being credited upon the recovery of the full amount, the company cannot ......
-
Insurance Co v. Ries
... ... Railway Co., 56 Wis. 325, 14 N.W. 452; O'Neil v. Iron ... Co., 63 Mich. 690, 30 N.W. 688; Clough v. Holden, 115 Mo ... 336, ... ...
-
U.S. Cast Iron & Foundry Co. v. Marler
... ... Old Colony R. Co., ... 127 Mass. 86, 34 Am.Rep. 349; also in O'Neil v. Lake ... Superior Iron Co., 63 Mich. 690, 30 N.W. 688; Meyer ... v. Haas, 126 Cal. 560, 58 P. 1042; ... ...
-
Johnsen v. American-Hawaiian SS Co.
...Robb v. Vos, 155 U.S. 13, 15 S.Ct. 4, 39 L. Ed. 52; Barton v. Oklahoma, K. & M. R. Co., 96 Okl. 119, 220 P. 929; O'Neil v. Lake Superior Iron Co., 63 Mich. 690, 30 N.W. 688." Page Pomeroy, in his work Equity Jurisprudence (4th Ed. 1918), Vol. 2, § 849, p. 1731, recognizes that a mistake of ......