O'Neill v. O'Neill

Decision Date02 October 1962
PartiesRaymond J. O'NEILL, Appellant, v. Mildred Mary O'NEILL, Respondent.
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court

Rummel & Connolly, Milwaukee, L. William Connolly, Milwaukee, of counsel, for appellant.

Eisenberg & Kletzke, Milwaukee, Edwin A. Star, Milwaukee, of counsel, for respondent.

DIETERICH, Justice.

Divorce is a statutory proceeding. 1 The statutes affecting divorce in this state provide for the support of minor children of the parties. 2 No jurisdiction or authority is conferred by the divorce statutes on the court to provide in a divorce judgment, or any proceeding in a divorce action for the support of adult children of the parties. The statutory provisions are plain and concise limiting the support, maintenance and education of the children to the period of their minority. Hence, any order awarding support money for an adult child in a divorce action would necessarily be extrajudicial, a nullity. Boehler v. Boehler (1905), 125 Wis. 627, 104 N.W. 840 and Halmu v. Halmu (1945), 247 Wis. 124, 19 N.W.2d 317.

It therefore necessarily follows that that part of the order of the trial court which revises the judgment by awarding support money for the adult child be vacated.

The order of the trial court awarding support money for the adult child to the defendant is reversed, and cause remanded with directions to enter an order crediting the payment made under the void order, so as to satisfy the requirement in the judgment for the payment of alimony, to the defendant and support money for the minor children of the parties.

1 Sec. 247.01 'Jurisdiction. Notwithstanding other statutes and session laws, the circuit court has jurisdiction of all actions * * * affecting marriage * * *.'

2 Sec. 247.23 'Support of wife and children; suit money. In every action * * * for a divorce * * * to compel support by husband, the court * * * or family court commissioner may, during the pendency thereof, make such orders concerning the care, custody and suitable maintenance of the minor children * * *.'

Sec. 247.24 'Judgment; care and custody, etc., of minor children. In rendering a judgment of * * * divorce * * * the court may make such further provisions therein * * * concerning the care, custody, maintenance and education of the minor children of the parties, * * *.'

Sec. 247.25 'Revision of judgment. The court may from time to time * * * on the petition of either of the parties * * * alter such judgment concerning the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
16 cases
  • Paternity of Roberta Jo W., In re, 96-2753
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 22 Mayo 1998
    ...The divorce statutes do not confer any authority on the circuit courts to order support of adult children. 3 See O'Neill v. O'Neill, 17 Wis.2d 406, 408, 117 N.W.2d 267 (1962). "The statutory provisions are plain and concise limiting the support, maintenance, and education of the children to......
  • Anderson v. Anderson
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 2 Junio 1976
    ...v. Bliwas (1970), 47 Wis.2d 635, 640, 641, 178 N.W.2d 35; Schmitz v. Schmitz (1975), 70 Wis.2d 882, 236 N.W.2d 657; O'Neill v. O'Neill (1962), 17 Wis.2d 406, 117 N.W.2d 267.9 See: Ausman v. Ausman (1966), 31 Wis.2d 79, 141 N.W.2d 869.10 See: Tesch v. Tesch (1974), 63 Wis.2d 320, 217 N.W.2d ......
  • Miller v. Miller
    • United States
    • Wisconsin Supreme Court
    • 28 Marzo 1975
    ...affirmed. No appeal costs to be taxed. 1 Beberfall v. Beberfall (1969), 44 Wis.2d 540, 543, 171 N.W.2d 390; O'Neill v. O'Neill (1962), 17 Wis.2d 406, 408, 117 N.W.2d 267; Halmu v. Halmu (1945), 247 Wis. 124, 131, 19 N.W.2d 317; Boehler v. Boehler (1905), 125 Wis. 627, 630, 104 N.W. 840.2 Se......
  • Baril v. Baril
    • United States
    • Maine Supreme Court
    • 19 Marzo 1976
    ...1972, 16 Ariz.App. 565, 494 P.2d 765; Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima, 1968, 103 Ariz. 240, 439 P.2d 811; O'Neill v. O'Neill, 1962, 17 Wis.2d 406, 117 N.W.2d 267; Reynolds v. Reynolds, 1961, 274 Ala. 477, 149 So.2d 770; Borchert v. Borchert, 1946, 185 Md. 586, 45 A.2d 463, 162 A.L.R......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT