Nelson v. Bd. of Engineers of Portland Fire Dep't
Decision Date | 26 August 1909 |
Citation | 75 A. 64,105 Me. 551 |
Parties | NELSON v. BOARD OF ENGINEERS OF PORTLAND FIRE DEPARTMENT. |
Court | Maine Supreme Court |
(Official.)
Exceptions from Supreme Judicial Court, Cumberland County.
Petition of Franklin Nelson for writ of certiorari to the Board of Engineers of the Portland Fire Department. Defendants except to rulings of the presiding justice. Exceptions sustained, and petition dismissed.
Petition for certiorari brought in the Supreme Judicial Court, Cumberland county, praying that the board of engineers of the fire department of Portland be ordered to certify to said court "the record of their proceedings relative to the discharge" of the plaintiff "to the end that said record or so much thereof as is illegal may be quashed."
"The defendants filed an answer to the petition, and requested the court to rule that so much of said answer as was a copy of the record of said board of engineers and of the record of the committee on fire department of the city council of said city of Portland be held a good and sufficient answer to the petition." The presiding justice made a pro forma ruling denying the request, and the defendants excepted. It was also "stipulated and agreed that if the court find the petition good, and the portion of the defendants' answer which is a copy of the records of the board of fire engineers and of the committee on fire department of the city council is not a good and sufficient answer to the petition, or the court is of opinion that evidence aliunde the record is admissible upon the petition, the case shall be remanded for further hearing at nisi, otherwise, petition to be dismissed."
The notice given by the defendants to the plaintiff, and referred to in the opinion, omitting caption and signatures thereto, is as follows:
Argued before WIIITEHOUSE, SAVAGE, SPEAR, and KING, JJ.
Michael T. O'Brien, for plaintiff.
Emery G. Wilson, for defendants.
KING, J. Petition for a writ of certiorari to quash the proceedings of the board of engineers of the fire department of the city of Portland relative to the removal of the petitioner as a permanent member of said fire department. The case is before the law court on exceptions by defendants to pro forma rulings of the presiding justice, together with a stipulation by the parties, and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Carter v. Wilkins
...County, 67 Me. 429 are representative; Municipal Officers in Andrews v. King, 77 Me. 224; Board of Engineers in Nelson v. Board of Engineers of Portland Fire Department, 105 Me. 551, 75 A. 64; Board of Police in Jellerson v. Board of Police of City of Biddeford, 134 Me. 443, 187 A. 713, and......
-
Warren v. Waterville Urban Renewal Authority
...unless objection was taken to the evidence for incompetency, so as to raise a legal question.'' Nelson v. Board of Engineers of Portland Fire Department, (1909), 105 Me. 551, 555, 74 A. 64, 66. '* * * In a proceeding of this nature (certiorari) this court does not act as a court of appeal u......
-
Grant v. Portland Pub. Sch., SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL ACTION DOCKET NO. AP-17-007
...evidence. Although there are some older Law Court decisions which appear to support this argument, see, e.g., Nelson v. Board of Engineers, 105 Me. 551, 555, 75 A. 64, 66 (1909), more recent decisions have adopted the principle that the scope of review under certiorari is the same as in oth......
-
Grant v. Portland Public Schools, Civil Action AP-17-007
... ... which appear to support this argument, see, e.g., Nelson ... v. Board of Engineers, 105 Me. 551, 555, 75 A. 64, ... 66 ... ...