Nelson v. Freeland, 216A98.
| Citation | 350 N.C. 108,533 S.E.2d 467 |
| Decision Date | 03 March 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. 216A98.,216A98. |
| Parties | John Harvey NELSON v. Daryl Dean C. FREELAND and Belinda Brittain Freeland. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina |
533 S.E.2d 467
350 N.C. 108
v.
Daryl Dean C. FREELAND and Belinda Brittain Freeland.
No. 216A98.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
March 3, 1999.
E. Thomas Maddox, Jr., A. Wayland Cooke, Greensboro, for Nelson.
Walter K. Burton, David K. Williams, Jr., James D. Secor, III, Greensboro, for Daryl Freeland and Belinda Freeland.
Prior report: 349 N.C. 615, 507 S.E.2d 882.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants for rehearing of the decision of this Court pursuant to Rule 31, N.C. Rules of Appellate Procedure, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 3rd day of March 1999."
To continue reading
Request your trial
17 cases
-
Martishius v. Carolco Studios, Inc., COA00-199.
...care to provide for plaintiff's safety. Nelson v. Freeland, 349 N.C. 615, 631-32, 507 S.E.2d 882, 892 (1998), reh'g denied, 350 N.C. 108, 533 S.E.2d 467 (1999). This duty has been defined as a duty of ordinary care to maintain the premises in a safe condition and to warn of hidden dangers t......
-
Williams v. E. J. Pope & Son, Inc., No. COA03-384 (NC 5/18/2004), COA03-384
...and invitees are owed the duty of reasonable care. See Nelson v. Freeland, 349 N.C. 615, 507 S.E.2d 882 (1998), reh'g denied, 350 N.C. 108, 533 S.E.2d 467 (1999). "'Reasonable care' requires that the landowner not unnecessarily expose a lawful visitor to danger and give warning of hidden ha......
-
Asher v. Huneycutt
..., 349 N.C. 615, 632, 507 S.E.2d 882, 892 (1998) (eliminating the distinction between licensees and invitees), reh'g denied , 350 N.C. 108, 533 S.E.2d 467 (1999). Further, "a landlord is potentially liable for injuries to third persons if he has control of the leased premises. Similarly, a l......
-
Novack v. Kosciuszko
..., 349 N.C. 615, 632, 507 S.E.2d 882, 892 (1998) (eliminating the distinction between licensees and invitees), reh’g denied , 350 N.C. 108, 533 S.E.2d 467 (1999). However, "there is no duty to warn a lawful visitor of a hazard obvious to any ordinarily intelligent person using her eyes in an......
Request a trial to view additional results