Nelson v. Grilli

Decision Date07 February 1977
Docket NumberNo. 75-130-A,75-130-A
Citation368 A.2d 1234,117 R.I. 538
PartiesRobert NELSON v. Anthony GRILLI, Jr. ppeal.
CourtRhode Island Supreme Court
OPINION

KELLEHER, Justice.

This is a personal injury suit brought by the plaintiff to recover damages for injuries allegedly sustained as the result of his vehicle being struck in the rear by another vehicle owned and operated by the defendant. Verdict was returned for the plaintiff, and the defendant, alleging several errors, has appealed from the trial court's denial of his motion for a new trial. Because the trial justice erroneously took the question of contributory negligence from the jury, we reverse and remand the case for a new trial. We do not reach the defendant's other contentions. Hereinafter, we will refer to the plaintiff as Nelson and the defendant as Grilli.

The parties agree that the collision took place on April 15, 1968, at approximately 7:30 p.m. at the intersection of Smith Street and River Avenue in Providence. Both cars were on River Avenue in a line of traffic. The traffic signal had been red, and Nelson had stopped. Grilli was approaching the intersection behind Nelson, but the light changed to green before Grilli was obliged to halt. When the light turned green, Nelson proceeded into the intersection to turn left on to Smith Street. He testified that the car preceding his, and also turning left, stopped because of oncoming traffic and 'when he stopped I stopped.' Within seconds the rear-end collision occurred.

Grilli's version of the collision was basically the same, except his testimony was that Nelson's car had 'stopped short.' He also testified that following the mishap they went into a drugstore to call the police and have a cup of coffee; that during the conversation he asked Nelson what had happened; and that Nelson explained he had stopped short because 'a woman driver (came) flying through the intersection from River Avenue.'

In his instruction to the jury, the trial justice charged that as a matter of law Nelson was not contributorily negligent, and the burden of 'explaining away his conduct' was on Grilli. Counsel for Grilli duly objected to this portion of the chage.

It is well established in Rhode Island that a rear-end collision establishes a prima facie case of negligence against the driver of the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • DeNardo v. Fairmount Foundries Cranston, Inc.
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Supreme Court
    • 12. April 1979
    ...Island the general rule is that negligence is a question for the jury unless the facts warrant only one conclusion. Nelson v. Grilli, 117 R.I. 538, 368 A.2d 1234 (1977). Stated in another way "where the facts suggest only one reasonable inference, the trial justice may properly treat the qu......
  • Barnes v. Quality Beef Co., Inc.
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Supreme Court
    • 12. Februar 1981
    ...established that a rear-end collision is prima facie evidence of negligence of the driver of the second vehicle. Nelson v. Grilli, 117 R.I. 538, 540, 368 A.2d 1234, 1235 (1977), citing Rachiele v. McGovern, 107 R.I. 241, 266 A.2d 36 (1970) and Maklar v. Greene, 106 R.I. 405, 261 A.2d 15 (19......
  • Messier v. Szymkiewicz
    • United States
    • Rhode Island Supreme Court
    • 4. Mai 1979
    ...contributory negligence. 2 Whether he has established that freedom is usually a question for the factfinder, Nelson v. Grilli, 117 R.I. 538, 540, 368 A.2d 1234, 1236 (1977); McVeigh v. McCullough, 96 R.I. 412, 422, 192 A.2d 437, 443 (1963), which becomes a question of law when the facts "wa......
  • Stancil v. Stancil
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 13. Juni 1990
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT