Nelson v. Montana Power Co.

Decision Date11 February 1993
Docket NumberNo. 92-068,92-068
Citation256 Mont. 409,847 P.2d 284
PartiesJames and Linda NELSON, d/b/a Goodtime Sports, and Northwestern National Insurance Group, an insurance company, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. The MONTANA POWER COMPANY, a Montana corporation, Defendant and Respondent.
CourtMontana Supreme Court

E. Eugene Atherton, Tara DePuy, Kalispell, for plaintiffs and appellants.

Robert T. O'Leary, Montana Power Co., Butte, for defendant and respondent.

McDONOUGH, Justice.

This is an appeal from a Sixth Judicial District Court, Park County judgment, granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

The sole issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting the defendant's motion for summary judgment.

On November 14, 1988, firefighters for the city of Livingston were called to the scene of a fire at Goodtime Sports, a local business, at about 12:30 p.m. No flames were evident but smoke was observed coming from under the eaves.

Livingston Fire Chief Frederick called the dispatch a short time later and requested that they alert Montana Power Company (MPC) about the fire and send workers out to turn the gas and electricity off. Jack Swanson, and Tom Petty, employees of MPC, arrived around 1:40 a.m. Swanson terminated the electricity and Petty stated that he observed a gas meter on the I Street side of the building and it appeared to be off. Petty then walked to the other side of the building and shut off a gas meter there and one at an adjacent building, in the company of Chief Frederick and Assistant Chief Parks.

An affidavit of Jack Swanson states that when he arrived at the scene of the fire, a few minutes before Petty, the building "was totally engulfed in flames and the back of the roof had fallen in." Tom Petty, in an interview on December 22, 1988, stated that the fire involved the whole building and the roof was caved in.

Chief Frederick concluded that the Nelson's loss for the fire was total. (Chief's investigative report) Chief Frederick also stated that between 7:00 and 7:30 a.m., he noticed a gas meter on the I Street side was on so he used a wrench to turn the valve off. State Assistant Fire Marshall, Tom Selleck, stated in his investigative report that the probable cause of the fire was electrical wiring.

After the fire, the Nelsons filed a complaint, later amended, in which they claimed that a MPC employee "negligently, carelessly and recklessly carried out its duty of turning of (sic) the gas service.... As a proximate cause of the negligence ... the fire in the subject building was fed by natural gas which severely complicated suppression efforts and created long and sustained burning leading to considerably more property damage than would have or should have occurred had the Defendant properly shut off the gas utility."

The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment in August of 1991. The motion was granted on December 2, 1991, and the judgment was entered on December 9, 1991. This appeal from that decision followed.

"Under Rule 56(c), M.R.Civ.P., summary judgment is proper if the record discloses no genuine issues of material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law." Kaseta v. N. Western Agency of Gr. Falls (1992), 252 Mont. 135, 138, 827 P.2d 804, 806.

The Nelsons contend that there is a factual controversy which precludes a grant of summary judgment--"whether MPC carried out its duty to turn off the gas service to the building." MPC counters that whether the gas was on or off, "there was no evidence that natural gas either fed the fire or contributed to its spread and resulting damage." Although there is a question about whether MPC turned off the gas service to Goodtime Sports, this Court agrees with MPC that no evidence was presented to show that natural gas fed the fire or increased the fire damage, regardless of whether the gas was on.

Firefighters Wagman and Spannring made full reports after the fire and neither mentions seeing blue flames or smelling natural gas, nor do they provide any information that might lead one to believe that natural gas was involved in feeding or increasing the fire. Also,...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Kostelecky v. Peas in a Pod LLC
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • October 11, 2022
    ... ... No. DA 21-0217 Supreme Court of Montana" October 11, 2022 ...           ... Submitted on Briefs: February 16, 2022 ...     \xC2" ... defendant physician "could have caused" the ... claimant's alleged injury); Nelson v. Mont. Power ... Co., 256 Mont. 409, 412, 847 P.2d 284, 286 (1993) ... ("a suspicion" ... ...
  • Powell County v. 5 ROCKIN'MS ANGUS RANCH, INC.
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • November 30, 2004
    ...non-moving party as to what may have happened do not constitute issues of fact precluding summary judgment. Nelson v. Montana Power Co. (1993), 256 Mont. 409, 412, 847 P.2d 284, 286. If no genuine issues of fact exist, the court must determine whether the moving party is entitled to judgmen......
  • Hagen v. Dow Chemical Co.
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1993
    ...issue of fact regarding the cause of the fish kill. Dow insists that, under this Court's recent decisions in Nelson v. Montana Power Company (1993), 256 Mont. 409, 847 P.2d 284, and Camp, 831 P.2d 586, summary judgment was proper because, based on the record, the Hagens could not prove by a......
  • James R. v. ASSOCIATES FINANCIAL SERVICES COMPANY OF MONTANA, INC.
    • United States
    • Montana Supreme Court
    • December 30, 2004
    ...party, as to what might have happened, do not constitute issues of fact precluding summary judgment. Nelson v. Montana Power Co. (1993), 256 Mont. 409, 412, 847 P.2d 284, 286. If no genuine issues of fact exist the court must then determine whether the moving party is entitled to judgment a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT