Nelson v. Stratton
| Decision Date | 11 December 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 72-2645 Summary Calendar.,72-2645 Summary Calendar. |
| Citation | 469 F.2d 1155 |
| Parties | Thomas Wesley NELSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Eugene STRATTON, Attorney at Law, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Thomas Wesley Nelson, pro se.
Eugene Y. Stratton, pro se.
Before JOHN R. BROWN, Chief Judge, and GOLDBERG and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.
Thomas Wesley Nelson has appealed from the district court's dismissal of his Civil Rights1 complaint which named as defendant the attorney who represented him in a criminal case. We affirm the ruling below.
The appellant has alleged that the attorney did not accord effective legal representation in several enumerated respects, as the result of which Nelson was convicted of a felony in a Texas state court. Nelson further alleges that the attorney was retained for him by his former employer.
The district court held that the complaint failed to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, since a retained counsel is not acting under color of state law within the purview of the statute. We agree. United States ex rel. Gittlemacker v. Commonwealth of Pa., E.D. Pa.1968, 281 F.Supp. 175, affirmed 3rd Cir. 1969, 413 F.2d 84, cert. denied 396 U.S. 1046, 90 S.Ct. 696, 24 L.Ed.2d 691. Our statement in O'Brien v. Colbath, 5th Cir. 1972, 465 F.2d 358, 1972 that "in our opinion § 1983 was never intended as a vehicle for prosecuting malpractice suits against court-appointed attorneys" is all the more applicable to suits against one's former privately-retained counsel. The order appealed from is affirmed.
Affirmed.
1 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lee v. Driskel, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-874-P
...Cir. 1982) (citing Polk County, supra); United States ex rel. Simmons v. Zibilich, 542 F.2d 259, 261 (5th Cir. 1976); Nelson v. Stratton, 469 F.2d 1155 (5th Cir. 1972); Richardson v. Fleming, 651 F.2d 366 (5th Cir. 1981); Mills v. Criminal District Court #3, 837 F.2d 677 (5th Cir. 1988)(cit......
-
Richardson v. Fleming
...sua sponte dismissed Richardson's suit for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. 2 Relying upon Nelson v. Stratton, 469 F.2d 1155 (5th Cir. 1972), cert. denied, 410 U.S. 957, 93 S.Ct. 1432, 35 L.Ed.2d 691 (1973), the District Court held that acts or omissions of retaine......
-
Lee v. Louisiana
...Cir. 1982) (citing Polk County, supra); United States ex rel. Simmons v. Zibilich, 542 F.2d 259, 261 (5th Cir. 1976); Nelson v. Stratton, 469 F.2d 1155 (5th Cir. 1972); Richardson v. Fleming, 651 F.2d 366 (5th Cir. 1981); Mills v. Criminal District Court #3, 837 F.2d 677 (5th Cir. 1988)(cit......
-
Thomas v. Huval
...Cir. 1982) (citing Polk County, supra); United States ex rel. Simmons v. Zibilich, 542 F.2d 259, 261 (5th Cir. 1976); Nelson v. Stratton, 469 F.2d 1155 (5th Cir. 1972); Richardson v. Fleming, 651 F.2d 366 (5th Cir. 1981); Mills v. Criminal District Court #3, 837 F.2d 677 (5th Cir. 1988)(cit......