Nemesis Veritas v. Toto
| Decision Date | 09 June 2003 |
| Docket Number | No. 02-1292.,02-1292. |
| Citation | 539 U.S. 914 |
| Parties | Nemesis Veritas, L. P., fka McMahan & Co., et al. v. Toto. |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Johnston v. Tampa Sports Authority, No. 06-14666.
...intermediate appellate courts. McMahan v. Toto, 311 F.3d 1077, 1080 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied, Nemesis Veritas, L.P. v. Toto, 539 U.S. 914, 123 S.Ct. 2273, 156 L.Ed.2d 129 (2003); Pardo v. State, 596 So.2d 665, 666 (Fla.1992) ("the decisions of the district courts of appeal represent th......
-
Daniels v. Crosby
...the issue differently." McMahan v. Toto, 311 F.3d 1077, 1080 (11th Cir.2002), cert. denied sub nom., Nemesis Veritas, L.P. v. Toto, 539 U.S. 914, 123 S.Ct. 2273, 156 L.Ed.2d 129 (2003). In this case, Florida appellate court has definitively ruled that Plaintiff does not have a claim to wage......
- Gray v. Novell, Inc.
-
Wight v. Wight
...not make a difference. McMahan v. Toto, 311 F.3d 1077, 1085 (11th Cir.2002) cert. denied sub nom. Nemesis Veritas, L.P. v. Toto, 539 U.S. 914, 123 S.Ct. 2273, 156 L.Ed.2d 129 (2003). In McMahan, the party who sought fees for litigating the amount of fees argued that because his was an hourl......