Nero v. Allied Waste Servs.
Decision Date | 06 February 2019 |
Docket Number | 18-501 |
Citation | 265 So.3d 1129 |
Parties | Ronald NERO v. ALLIED WASTE SERVICES, et al. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana — District of US |
Michael B. Miller, Jacqueline K. Becker, Miller & Associates, P. O. Drawer 1630, Crowley, LA 70527-1630, (337) 785-9500, COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT: Ronald Nero.
James R. Raines, Joseph J. Cefalu, III, Kelsey A. Clark, Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, LLP, P. O. Box 3197, Baton Rouge, LA 70821-3197, (225) 387-4000, COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT/APPELLEE/CROSS-APPELLANT: BFI Waste Services, LLC, d/b/a Allied Waste Services of Acadiana-Scott.
Court composed of Sylvia R. Cooks, Shannon J. Gremillion, and Phyllis M. Keaty, Judges.
In this protracted workers' compensation case, Mr. Ronald Nero appeals the judgment of the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ) that modified his 2010 workers' compensation award from temporary total disability (TTD) to supplemental earnings benefits (SEBs) and reduced the award by fifty percent retroactive to March 14, 2016 for his refusal to submit to vocational rehabilitation services. The employer answered the appeal and seeks forfeiture of benefits pursuant to La.R.S. 23:1208, restitution of all benefits paid after December 9, 2016 (the date of the hearing at issue), and sanctions against Mr. Nero's attorney. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the WCJ's judgment and deny the employer's motion for sanctions.
Mr. Nero was employed by Appellee, BFI Waste Services, LLC, d/b/a Allied Waste Services of Acadiana-Scott (Allied) as a driver. On February 15, 2008, Mr. Nero was injured when he was struck by a car while crossing a road on foot. Following the accident, Mr. Nero was treated by, among other physicians, Dr. Michael Holland, an orthopedic surgeon chosen by Mr. Nero. Dr. Holland opined on May 20, 2009, that Mr. Nero had reached maximum medical improvement (MMI) and could return to medium duty work. This opinion reinforced the opinion derived from a functional capacity evaluation Mr. Nero underwent in March 2009. Dr. Douglas Bernard, an orthopedic surgeon who saw Mr. Nero at the behest of Allied, reached the same conclusion. Nevertheless, on June 9, 2010, the WCJ awarded Mr. Nero weekly compensation indemnity of $ 522.00 per week on the basis of TTD status.1
In late October 2014, Ms. Susan Davidson, a vocational rehabilitation counselor retained by Allied's insurer, wrote Mr. Nero's counsel advising of her retainer and requesting dates on which she could interview Mr. Nero for the purpose of providing vocational rehabilitation services to him and advising him that Allied wanted Mr. Nero re-evaluated by Dr. Holland. Mr. Nero's attorney wrote back on November 3, 2014 and asked her to complete a form containing thirteen questions or conditions and asking whether she would agree to abide by them.2 Ms. Davidson wrote back and advised that she was bound by the Code of Professional Ethics for Licensed Vocational Rehabilitation Counselors and was not required to agree to the terms of the form. Mr. Nero's attorney then wrote back and advised that Ms. Davidson was not required to agree to the terms, but, until she did, she would not be allowed to interview Mr. Nero, and Mr. Nero would not return to see Dr. Holland.
Allied responded by filing a "Motion to Compel Vocational Rehabilitation and Medical Examinations and to Suspend and Reduce Benefits, and for Sanctions." Mr. Nero filed a "Motion and Order for Penalties and Attorneys Fees," in which he alleged that, on February 21, 2015, Allied had reduced his weekly indemnity from $ 522.00 per week to $ 261.00 per week (fifty percent); that on June 27, 2015, the benefits were again reduced to $ 186.43 per week; that on July 2, 2015, indemnity was terminated; and that on July 14, 2015, his medical treatment benefits were terminated. Mr. Nero requested attorney fees and penalties for these actions. Allied then filed an exception arguing that Mr. Nero's latest motion was an unauthorized attempt to utilize summary process to litigate a matter that should only be tried by ordinary process. On February 12, 2016, the WCJ heard Mr. Nero's motion and, on March 7, 2016, awarded Mr. Nero penalties and attorney fees.
On February 16, 2016, Mr. Nero filed a "Motion to Review the Need for and Quality of Services Provided by Defendants for Vocational Rehabilitation Services," in which he alleged that no vocational rehabilitation counselor had provided services to him and that Allied had not demonstrated a need for such services. In his prayer, Mr. Nero requested that Ms. Davidson be removed or be ordered to "comply with reasonable conditions to assure adherence to [La.R.S.] 23:1226." On March 16, 2016, Allied filed an amended motion to modify the 2010 judgment to reduce or terminate Mr. Nero's benefits on the bases of his refusal to submit to medical examination with Dr. Holland, his refusal to participate in vocational rehabilitation, and the fact that he had been released to return to work. These motions were heard on December 9, 2016, and the WCJ ruled on December 14, 2017 as follows (record references omitted):
To continue reading
Request your trial- State v. Mayeux
-
Weaver v. Chicago Bridge & Iron
... ... Schooner Petroleum Servs. , 02-397, p. 12 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/27/02), 834 So.2d 642, 650, writ ... 7 (La.App. 2 Cir. 6/27/18), 251 So.3d 615, 622 (citing Green v. Allied Bldg. Stores, Inc. , 50, 117 (La. App. 2 Cir. 1/22/16), 185 So.3d 164, ... 23:1208 [.]" Nero v. Allied Waste Services , 18-501, p. 16 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/19), 265 ... ...
-
Leonards v. Carmichael's Cashway Pharmacy, Inc.
...counselor or the necessity for such services[,]" such conditions may not be imposed. Id . at 793.In Nero v. Allied Waste Services , 18-501 (La.App. 3 Cir. 2/6/19), 265 So.3d 1129, writ denied , 19-384 (La. 4/29/19), 268 So.3d 1032, this court was faced with similar questioning by the employ......