Neujahr v. Producers Com'n Ass'n
| Decision Date | 12 February 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 87-2273,87-2273 |
| Citation | 838 F.2d 1003 |
| Parties | Eldon NEUJAHR, Appellant, v. PRODUCERS COMMISSION ASSOCIATION, Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
John R. Brogan, York, Neb., for appellant.
John R. Douglas, Omaha, Neb., for appellee.
Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges.
This is an action for breach of an alleged oral contract of employment. The plaintiff claims that the defendant agreed to employ him for three years, but then discharged him after six months, in breach of the agreement. On motion for judgment on the pleadings, the District Court 1 ruled for defendant and dismissed the complaint. The District Court held that the action was barred by the Nebraska Statute of Frauds, Neb.Rev.Stat.
On appeal, plaintiff contends that a written memorandum of the alleged oral agreement, sufficient to take it out of the statute, was delivered to him shortly after he commenced his employment with defendant. In general, a contract within the statute of frauds is nevertheless enforceable if it is evidenced by a writing, signed by or on behalf of the party to be charged, which meets certain qualifications. One of these qualifications is that the writing must state with reasonable certainty the essential terms of the unperformed promises in the alleged oral contract. Restatement (Second) of Contracts Sec. 131. Here, the writing which plaintiff relies on as fulfilling these requirements was attached to his complaint. It clearly fails to contain a number of the material terms of the alleged oral agreement. For example, it does not state the salary at which plaintiff was to be employed, nor does it provide for the various kinds of insurance that plaintiff claims he was promised. Provisions of this kind, we think, are essential elements of the alleged oral contract. A writing that does not refer to them cannot save the contract from the statute of frauds. See Ancom, Inc. v. E.R. Squibb & Sons, Inc., 658 F.2d 650 (8th Cir.1981).
1 The Hon. Warren K. Urbom, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Ferrera v. Carpionato Corp.
...and other compensation provisions were left blank, the draft agreement did not satisfy the statute. See Neujahr v. Producers Commission Association, 838 F.2d 1003, 1004 (8th Cir.1988) (three year employment agreement barred by statute of frauds where writing failed to contain various "mater......
-
Hoffius v. Maestri
...principle. See also Izard v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co., 128 Ark. 433, 435-36, 194 S.W. 1032, 1033 (1917); Neujahr v. Producers Comm'n Ass'n, 838 F.2d 1003, 1004 (8th Cir.1988). Here, we agree with the appellees that (1) the memorandum lacks a reference to P.A.M. or Maestri; (2) it is imposs......
-
Nelson v. Production Credit Ass'n of the Midlands
...be enforceable where the due date, security, rate of interest and the time for repayment were not specified. In Neujahr v. Producers Comm. Ass., 838 F.2d 1003 (8th Cir.1988), a claimed contract was held to be insufficiently definite to take it out of the realm of the statute of frauds when ......