Nevada Nickel Syndicate v. National Nickel Co.

Decision Date07 August 1899
Docket Number641.
Citation96 F. 133
PartiesNEVADA NICKEL SYNDICATE, Limited, v. NATIONAL NICKEL CO. et al.
CourtU.S. District Court — District of Nevada

The original bill was filed July 20, 1897. Frederick B. Pierce Milo T. Sipe, R. Peterman, and Louis Smith were made parties defendant on the ground that they had, or claimed to have some interest in the property, which, it was alleged, was subsequent to, and subject to, the claim of the complainant. An amended bill was filed September 6, 1897, to which Charles Bell was added as a party defendant. The supplemental bill was, by leave of the court, filed October 25, 1897. Charles E. Brooks was made a party defendant thereto. The supplemental bill prayed for relief against two judgments obtained by default against complainant in the state district court for Ormsby county, Nev.,-- one by the National Nickel Company for $26,080 damages for breach of the contracts A and C; the other in favor of Charles E. Brooks, a stockholder in the National Nickel Company, to set aside and cancel Exhibit B. Both of these judgments, after the filing of the supplemental bill herein, were set aside by the state courts and hence are eliminated from this suit, except in so far as they may tend to sustain complainant's allegations of fraud against the defendant corporation. An answer of the National Nickel Company to the amended bill was filed September 29, 1897, and to the supplemental bill on April 5 1898. A separate answer of Louis Smith was filed October 14 1897, and a separate answer of Charles E. Brooks to the supplemental bill was filed April 5, 1898.

The complainant's right to recover herein rests upon the construction which is to be given to certain contracts and instruments of writing executed by the respective corporations, and upon the testimony of witnesses as to whether the covenants in said contracts and instruments, to be performed by complainant, have been performed in such a manner as to be binding upon the defendant corporation. These contracts are hereby designated as Exhibits A, B, and C.

Exhibit A reads as follows:

'Articles of agreement made the fifteenth day of October, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-four, between the Nevada Nickel Syndicate, Limited, whose registered office is situate at 40 Great Tower street, in the city of London (hereinafter called the 'syndicate'), of the first part; the National Nickel Company, a company formed under the laws of the state of Illinois (hereinafter called the 'company'), of the second part; and John Leighton, of 7 Nottingham place, Marylebone road, in the county of London, gentleman, of the third part: Whereas, the company are the owners of the nickel mines, particulars of which are mentioned and set forth in the schedule hereto; and whereas, they are desirous of erecting plant for the purpose of working the said mines; and whereas, Mess. Thomas Bolton & Sons, of Oakamoor Mills, near Cheadle, North Staffordshire, have agreed to purchase from the company one hundred and twenty-five tons contained nickel in matte at a price which will amount to ten thousand five hundred pounds, or thereabouts; and whereas, the company have applied to the syndicate to provide such a sum as may be necessary for the erection and preliminary working of the machinery necessary to manufacture and ship a limited quantity, not exceeding the amount of matte required to provide for the order above mentioned, which the syndicate agree to do upon the terms hereinafter mentioned: Now, it is hereby agreed as follows: (1) The company will forthwith instruct Frederick William Martino, of Sheffield, or, in the event of his declining or being unable to act, some other person of equal position, to be approved by the syndicate, to proceed to Nevada for the purpose of purchasing and erecting the machinery necessary for the purpose above mentioned, and will arrange with the said Frederick William Martino; or such other expert as aforesaid, to superintend the purchase, erection, and preliminary working of such machinery as aforesaid. (2) The syndicate will from time to time provide the moneys necessary to pay for such machinery as may be deemed necessary by the said Frederick William Martino for the purpose aforesaid, and for the traveling expenses of the said Frederick William Martino, not exceeding two hundred pounds, and for the salary of the said Frederick William Martino, and for the wages of the men required for the erection and preliminary working of the said machinery, but so that the aggregate amount to be provided under this clause, including the costs and expenses connected with the negotiations for and completion of these presents, and the formation and registration of the syndicate, and all costs, charges, and expenses to which the syndicate may be put in connection with the business, the subject of this agreement, and also including the traveling expenses of a representative of the company, not exceeding two hundred pounds, and those of a representative of the syndicate, who is to proceed to Nevada as hereinafter mentioned, and which are agreed at the sum of two hundred pounds, shall not exceed four thousand pounds. (3) The company hereby agree, for the considerations aforesaid, to pay to the syndicate a sum equal to the aggregate amount provided by them under clause 2 of this agreement, together with a bonus of eight hundred pounds, within ten days after bills of lading for a sufficient portion of the said one hundred and twenty-five tons of contained nickel to produce the said aggregate amount, and the eight hundred pounds, after providing for discount, first arrive in England, but so that under no circumstances shall payment of the said mount be delayed beyond the first day of August, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-five. (4) The company further agree to pay the syndicate a further bonus of seven thousand two hundred pounds in manner following: That is to say, the sum of eight hundred pounds on the first day of November, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-five, and the sum of one thousand six hundred pounds on the first day of November in each of the four following years. (5) The syndicate shall be entitled to send a representative to the said mines, who shall have the disbursement of all moneys in connection with the said works, and have general superintendence of the works. (6) For the purpose of securing the payment of the moneys payable by the company to the syndicate as provided in clause 3 hereof, the company hereby transfers to the syndicate absolutely all ore at present mined, or which may during the continuance of the security be mined, by the company, and all plant, machinery, and other assets of the company for the time being at the said mines; and they agree forthwith to give possession to the syndicate by the representative of the company who is to proceed forthwith to Nevada, to the end that the absolute control of the said mines and all other assets of the said company on the said mines shall be and remain in the custody of the syndicate, by way of security to them for the repayment to them of the moneys payable under clause 3 as aforesaid. (7) By way of further security for the payment of the said moneys payable by the company under clause 3 as aforesaid, the company hereby charge with the payment thereof the contract of the company with the said T. Bolton & Sons for the purchase of the said one hundred and twenty-five tons contained nickel, and the proceeds of sale thereof. And these presents shall be a sufficient authority to the said T. Bolton & Sons to pay the proceeds of sale of the said contained nickel in matte in cash to the syndicate, and the receipt of the syndicate, or of any officer duly authorized by them, shall be a sufficient discharge to the said T. Bolton & Sons for all moneys payable in respect of the said one hundred and twenty-five tons of contained nickel. (8) By way of security for payment of the sums which will become payable in the year one thousand eight hundred and ninety-five, and each of the four subsequent years, by the company, under clause 4 of these presents, the company hereby charge the first products of the mines during each of such years, respectively, with the payment of the amount payable in such year, except that as regards the year one thousand eight hundred and ninety-five the charge shall only operate after the said one hundred and twenty-five tons of contained nickel has been produced. (9) The company hereby guaranties that it has not and will not issue any debentures which can in any way take priority over the charges hereby created, and it is expressly stipulated that the syndicate shall not be bound to make any advances other than the necessary cost of traveling expenses and current salary of Mr. Martino, unless and until the syndicate shall be satisfied, by an examination of the registers necessary under the law of Nevada, that no such charges exist; and, in the event of any such charges being discovered, the company hereby agree forthwith to repay all moneys then advanced by the syndicate, together with all expenses and costs as hereinbefore mentioned, and together with interest thereon at five per cent. per annum. (10) the above agreement has been entered into by the syndicate at the request of the said John Leighton, who is largely interested in the company; and the said John Leighton, in consideration thereof, hereby guaranties the due payment of the moneys payable by the company under clause 3 of these presents, and, further, that the company shall and will make, do, execute, and perfect all such deeds and documents, and make and complete all registrations necessary to give the syndicate a valid and effectual charge on the products of the mines, as provided by clause eight of these presents,
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Pettengill v. Blackman
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • 24 Marzo 1917
    ... ... L. Rep. 1471, 49 S.W. 426; ... Kelsey v. National Bank of Crawford County , 69 Pa ... 426; Hooker v. Eagle ... v. Roland , 128 Pa. 119, ... 18 A. 429; Nevada Nickel Syndicate v. National Nickel ... Co. , 96 F. 133.) ... ...
  • National Nickel Co. v. Nevada Nickel Syndicate
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Nevada
    • 21 Enero 1901
  • Young v. Nevada Title Co.
    • United States
    • Nevada Supreme Court
    • 29 Octubre 1987
    ...conflict and where loyalty to one does not necessarily constitute breach of duty to the other. See Nevada Nickel Syndicate, Ltd. v. National Nickel Co., 96 F. 133, 147 (C.C.D.Nev.1899); see also Knudson v. Weeks, 394 F.Supp. 963 (Okla.1975). Further, Nevada statutes contemplate that a mortg......
  • National Nickel Co. v. Nevada Nickel Syndicate
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 14 Octubre 1901

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT