Nevada State Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Babtkis
| Decision Date | 17 October 1967 |
| Docket Number | No. 5195,5195 |
| Citation | 83 Nev. 385,432 P.2d 498 |
| Parties | NEVADA STATE BOARD OF CHIROPRACTIC EXAMINERS, Appellant, v. Morton M. BABTKIS, D.C., Respondent. |
| Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
This appeal is from a district court review of an order of the Nevada State Board of Chiropractic Examiners permanently revoking the license of Morton M. Babtkis to practice chiropractic. The district court modified the Board's order by substituting for revocation, a six months suspension to be followed by two years probation. The Board contends that the court modification should not be allowed to stand, since substantial evidence was presented at the hearing before the Board to support its order of revocation. We agree with the Board and reinstate the order which it entered.
The revocation order rests upon evidence that a major part of the healing art of chiropractic conducted in the office of Babtkis at Henderson, Nevada, was a 'local' massage--an act of hand masturbation performed by female employees upon male customers. The fee was ten dollars. Customers were lured to his office by advertisements in the Las Vegas newspapers. An example: 'Relaxing massage, 567--7301, Joanne, Henderson.' The number was the telephone number of Babtkis' office--Joanne was a 'masseuse' employed by him. There were others.
The Board found that such activity was 'unprofessional conduct' within the meaning of NRS 634.010(3)(4), 1 and evidence that Babtkis no longer possesses 'good moral character' within the intendment of NRS 634.140(1)(b). 2 Either finding allows the penalty of revocation or the discipline of suspension. NRS 634.140; 634.150. 3 The Board chose revocation. We cannot fault the Board for its view.
Chiropractic is a healing art. Hand masturbation is not. One in the practice of chiropractic must be dedicated to the ideal of serving those who are ailing and in need of professional attention. Hand masturbation bears no relationship to that ideal and, in the present context, is a vulgar, base act, reflecting adversely upon the moral character of Babtkis, who knowingly allowed such to regularly occur in his office.
The district court approved the Board's finding of unprofessional conduct, but believed that the practice of hand masturbation by his female employees did not show the absence of the good moral character required of a professional man. It was for this reason that the court modified the Board's revocation order to suspension of license and probation. Although there may be instances of unprofessional conduct which do not reflect adversely upon a practitioner's moral character, the condoning of hand masturbation by female employees is not one of them. We do not accept the distinction drawn by the district court.
When the determination of an administrative board is challenged, to function of this court is identical to that of the district court. Urban Renewal Agency, etc. v. Iacometti, 79 Nev. 113, 379 P.2d 466 (1963); McKenzie v. Shelly, 77 Nev. 237, 362 P.2d 268 (1961). It is to review...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Meinhold v. Clark County School Dist. Bd. of School Trustees of Clark County School Dist.
...is indentical to that of the district court. Cf. Barnum v. Williams, 84 Nev. 37, 436 P.2d 219 (1968); Nevada State Bd. Chiropractic Exam'rs. v. Babtkis, 83 Nev. 385, 432 P.2d 498 (1967); Miller v. Munger, 88 Nev. 405, 498 P.2d 1336 (1972); Miller v. West, 88 Nev. 105, 493 P.2d 1332 The appe......
-
Miller v. West
...or contrary to the law. NRS 426.450(3); Barnum v. Williams, 84 Nev. 37, 436 P.2d 219 (1968); Nevada State Bd. Chiropractic Exam'rs v. Babtkis, 83 Nev. 385, 432 P.2d 498 (1967). The major change in the grants to the respondent and his family was due to the Welfare Division's new policy of al......
-
Parson v. Miller
...v. Public Serv. Comm'n., 86 Neb. 662, 474 P.2d 397 (1970); Miller v. West, 88 Nev. 105, 493 P.2d 1332 (1972); Bd. Chiropractic Exam'rs. v. Babtkis, 83 Nev. 385, 432 P.2d 498 (1967); No. Las Vegas v. Pub. Serv. Comm'n., 83 Nev. 278, 429 P.2d 66 (1967). At the fair hearing, the welfare divisi......
-
Gandy v. State ex rel. Division of Investigation and Narcotics
...Miller v. West, 88 Nev. 105, 493 P.2d 1332 (1972); City of Reno v. Folsom, 86 Nev. 39, 464 P.2d 454 (1970); Bd. of Chiropractic Exam'rs v. Babtkis, 83 Nev. 385, 432 P.2d 498 (1967); Urban Renewal Agcy. v. Iacometti, 79 Nev. 113, 379 P.2d 466 (1963).2 The district court found that Gandy had ......